mp072004
Posts: 381
Joined: 12/22/2005 Status: offline
|
It's not necessary to use toys to cause people physical pain. It's generally not necessary to use toys to persuade people to obey. That doesn't mean that it's undesirable or wrong to use toys. Nor is it undesirable or wrong to not use toys. In my view, it's correct to use toys when toys are the most effective way to get to the goal (whatever the goal is). I can do good SM play without toys, and I can do bondage effectively without lengths of special dedicated rope or special cuffs. (Although you do need some kind of binding implement to do bondage--it can be a handkerchief, a t-shirt, a bra, whatever, but you've got to have something to bind with, otherwise it sort of stops being bondage.) Hands, elbows, knees, and teeth are good SM toys, and I'm a great fan of hurting people with "found objects," too. But to do certain kinds of SM, and to create certain kinds of sensation, I need toys. I cannot reliably create electrical sensations without toys. I don't have a body part that can create the sharp, specific, surface impact of a thin rattan cane or a rubber band. But then again, I'm a dominant woman, so I don't equate "manly" and "dominant." Monica
|