RexLongBeach
Posts: 58
Joined: 10/30/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Satyr6406 ...While I wouldn't label someone ("damaged goods") as that is judging them, I would probably assume that, eventually, a submissive with those kinds of scars would become "bored" with my "almost 'nilla" lifestyle (as far as BDSM sadists and masochists are concerned). I'm ok judging people, so I would be OK calling someone damaged goods if, IMnsHO, they were. However, a few scars from prior rough play would not consititute damaged goods. Like most of the Doms responding, my submissive is beautiful to me. Her submission makes her even more beautiful, and I make no claim of objectivity. Body image issues are always difficult. Girls know they don't look like the models in the catalogs or in the advertisements, and figure they're supposed to look like that. By that standard, my wallet is supposed to look like Donald Trump's... but hey, guess what? It doesn't! The body image issue raised in the OP is just like any other body image issue (weight, hair, bust, you name it). If I wanna see my girl, or any particular part of her, that's what I want to see. I wouldn't ask to see it, or have a photo of it, if I didn't, personally, actually, want it. That being said, as Satyr points out, sometimes heavy scars or body mods may raise a flag, as I personally don't play with needles, haven't left scars, etc. It can be a compatibility issue without having the girl in question be labeled "damaged goods." Presumably, though, if you're being asked for pix.... he's accepted you just as you are. So, why can't you? Just askin'... Rex
|