aldompdx
Posts: 538
Joined: 10/24/2004 Status: offline
|
Focus50, LeatherBentOne The D/s dynamic exists wholly inside, as part of a person's subjective experience. The dynamic derives from the associations which our ego places on various forms of perception. How else could one person experience a pinch as pain, and another experience it as pleasure, or have different experiences of the exact same thing in different contexts at different times? The external form of the dynamic manifests from the inner associations, not the other way around. This is because you subjectively perceive within, and do not objectively perceive externally. It is human nature to believe that fulfillment is received from an external object in whatever form. However, the proof is in the experience of fulfillment. The experiencer can only associate fulfillment to that which has already been processed by the senses, and has already formed a neural map in the brain. Sensation(cause) -> neural map(effect). Neural map(cause) -> associated fulfillment (effect). A sensation, without both the neural map and association with fulfillment, is a neutral experience. >Domination has nothing to do with control. Anyone care to share their experiences with an "out of control" dominant? For example, one who lacks the control to respect boundaries, limits, and safewords? There is no such thing as "power exchange." That is just more BDSM protocol jargon, an inaccurate label. Personal power always resides within a person. One who lacks personal power cannot even make the choice to exchange anything. What is exchanged is authority to exercise personal power. The descriptive term would be "authority exchange." This is very well described by the ALI commentary in the law of agency. > Im sure they already know that, or why would they seek a Dominant? Again, as a manifestation of human nature, one seeks to "receive" a particular feeling from an external object. Having some awareness of one's natural "set point" along the continuum between the polarities of control and surrender, does not presumptively mean they have mastered all aspects of who they are. One who is defined by that which they are not, lives in the negative rather than the positive of who they are. The premise that one polarity is nothing without the other indicates a form of psychological dependency, oftentimes co-dependency which is particularly common in submissives and BDSM slaves. Potential between polarities is relative. One who surrenders to a balanced or even slightly submissive person still has a difference in potential. There remains a 15volt difference between -3volts and -18volts. Could there be more potential, sure. Twice the potential can be achieved by finding a +12volt partner, or by yourself further surrendering to a -33volt level. Those who advocate a world of absolutes may disagree. Nonetheless, that does not negate the perspective of those who recognize the relative nature of the control/surrender polarity. There are many who have engaged in inward exploration, and resonate with the "zen" of my words. I accept that there are also those who may adhere to the premise that all subjective experience is caused exclusively by external stimuli, and thus, may be an objectified effect.
< Message edited by aldompdx -- 5/2/2007 11:04:10 AM >
|