Suleiman
Posts: 1127
Joined: 9/9/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MasterFireMaam quote:
ORIGINAL: juliaoceania I saw the thread and did not respond possibly because it does not matter to me how people define themselves or refer to themselves. Ditto. Actually, I thought, "Ok...and...?" Master Fire Yeah, that was pretty much my thought. "Good for you, whomever you are" (polite golf clap) "You're a Master. If you're very lucky, someone else might even agree with you." I didn't bother to read the thread either. Really, it looked like trollbait, like one of those posts where someone is bored so they say something provocative to drum up a little attention. Still, I had to admit, if that was the case, it was a nice change from the usual whine threads that crop up when someone is feeling bored and petulant. So... in the original experiment, did anyone deem you "worthy" of the title, and if so, what was their criteria? Did they ask you for references? Demand a resume of past experience? I am terribly curious - aside from getting into a long-term relationship with a self-declaired submissive who is willing to call you their owner or master, how does one get the title bestowed upon them?
_____________________________
Think of my verbosity as a sort of litmus test for our relationship. I write in a manner identical to how I speak and how I think. If you can not cope with what I have written here, it is probably for the best if we go our separate ways.
|