Dtesmoac
Posts: 565
Joined: 6/22/2006 Status: offline
|
No. Britain wanted to join the EU and then wanted the EU to change to its vision. If Britain didn't like the EU, why did it join? It joined a common market with a vision of closer ties, not a single country. NATO is increasingly redundant even though Britain refuses to accept that fact. France and Germany has recognized for a long time that European and American interests are diverging, it is better to be realistic about it now than wait for America to pull the plug on NATO. Security alliances are about facing mutual threats, not about having exactly the same interests. Continental Europeans have every right to be pissed off with Britain. Right? No they have the right to have an opinion, and to express that and if they wish to get an integrated Europe inclusive Britain to provide the very real and valid arguments to achieve it. Right to be pissed off is do as we tell you or else..... a style more asociated with another continet perhaps :) lol ... !!!. Britain was the late comer, not everyone else. Britain joined Europe, Europe didn't join Britain. Club rules apply, or not, equally or not? If Britain argued its case in Europe I would have some sympathy with your view but it doesn't. agree It was Britain that broke ranks over Iraq, it is events that have proved Britain wrong but still Britain thinks it is always right. Breaking ranks is an emotional response. As France and Germany and many other independent states within the EU have done and will continue to do it followed a seperate foreign policy.....there is not requirement for the EU to have a single voice other than on trade issues. Germany and France are exercisng their "right" not to have troops in the firing line in Afghanistan, breaking ranks etc, etc, etc,........ The EU does this effectively and it is the EU that has changed the face of Europe, not NATO. NATO provided the security for the EU to work. The big question is what if anything the UK gets from the above............... mmm perhaps one for another different thread. I totally disagree with a two speed Europe which is really about Britain having its cake and eating it too. After more than thirty years of membership it is about time Britain decided whether it was in or out. Europe needs to decide on Europes vision and a single super state is perhaps not the way to go. Soft power can be more influencing than hard power. A single Europe would be expected to operate as a major if not super power....at the moment it gets away with flip flopping. A confederation rather than federation should be considered. If Britain wasn't getting anything out the EU it would have left long ago. The EU will survive whether Britain is a member or not. Never said other wise. I would also recommend Brits living in Europe for a few years, they will find their democracy has a lot of catching up to do and that the French and Germans et al enjoy more democracy than they do. [/quote] [/quote]
|