vield
Posts: 354
Joined: 1/1/2004 Status: offline
|
The "Leathermen" history by Madame Butterfly is quite accurate, but as many of the responding folks mention, there are lots of differences of opinion about what defines bi-sexuality and about what defines a leather lifestyle. Personally I feel that whatever label a person chooses to wear on their own forehead is their business, and that any label put upon anyone by others has little meaning. I know folks who believe any same sex experience at all means one is gay. I know people who feel that EVERYONE deep inside needs whatever it is that they personally like. I know women who say they seek "bi" connections but mean they seek only female partners. I know men who say they seek "bi" meaning they want poly play with F/M couples. So I am glad to see that here LotusSong defines "bi" as being equally attracted to both sexes. That certainly is not me, for I am very much more attracted to females than males, but I have enjoyed experiences with males and am very attracted to a very few other men. Leather I find interesting in many forms, whether as toys to use, toys to make, or equipment or garments of many sorts of leather. The typical black biker leather stuff can be hot but I can get along with it or without it. Suede goodies can be interesting. The many different kinds of leather falls for floggers I enjoy working with, and leather paddles, whips and bondage gear I enjoy. I do not "need" any of these, but I like most of them. Thus many would say I am "into" leather, and many would say I am not, based upon their personal interpretations.
_____________________________
As always, your mileage may vary! vield
|