Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

LTR doesn't mean LTR for all.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/3/2005 4:12:38 AM   
infyniti


Posts: 37
Joined: 8/13/2004
Status: offline
I have been in a LTR relationship for almost 6 years. It progressed thru the usual stages. We met on line, we talked on the phone, we met in a public place... we dated. Two and a half years later we married. We met on a " kink friendly" website. We were looking for the same things. Simple? Well after 10 years in the lifestyle and 6 years in a LTR. I have come to realize that what LTR means to one, doesn't mean the same to others. We were just lucky. I have heard others complain that they can't find the long term relationship they seek. Somehow, somewhere people fail to communicate. Gee, isn't that the " age old" complaint??? But it is so true. Some want a person they can meet every week end, or every other week end with the same person, others want to see that person everyday. But somehow it seems that when 2 people meet, while they are discussing limits, and trying to impress each other with other accomplishments, they fail to discuss what Long Term means to each of them. Weeks down the road, the relationship goes awry and each blame the other.
It all makes me wonder... entering into a D/s relationship takes a great deal of communication. How does one NOT include what they are looking for or seeking for the future of their lives?
It seems to be an ongoing problem. I see it in many relationships and it is something I just don't understand.
Can we all just imagine how much easier relationships would be if we took that extra few minutes to just explain ourselves?
Just my two cents worth. But I learned early on that communication is key to any relationship. More so with relationships that involve D/s.

Happy subbie wife in New England,

infyniti
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/3/2005 4:56:48 AM   
BobcatsLilMinx


Posts: 201
Joined: 4/8/2005
From: UK
Status: offline
This is very true... In the earlier conversations with my Master, we talked about what both if us meant when we said we were looking for a "long term relationship". This is important to me, as I hope someday to have children, and want a man who can be a father and husband, as well as a Master. (Guess how many men that drives away...!) So now we both have very real expectations if where we'll be in 10 years time, and can enjoy the "now" without having to worry if our long term dreams will conflict with each other.

Minx

(in reply to infyniti)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/3/2005 4:57:51 AM   
LadyAngelika


Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

It all makes me wonder... entering into a D/s relationship takes a great deal of communication. How does one NOT include what they are looking for or seeking for the future of their lives?


Just because it requires a great deal of communication, doesn't mean it's going to get the requisite communication and that is most likely why the relationship fails.

- LA

_____________________________

Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove

(in reply to infyniti)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/3/2005 8:26:30 AM   
Emmmrld


Posts: 57
Joined: 4/21/2005
From: Las Vegas, Nevada
Status: offline
I agree with you about communication and discussing what you want.

However, it's been my experience that when you do that men get freaked out.

For instance, I want a long term relationship, one that eventually leads to marriage (and a family). For some reason men seem to think that means I want them to put a ring on my finger the first time we meet and be married by the second. UM NO.

I want to get to know you. See how you are as a man, with your friends, with your family. I want to know you are responibile. Just because I want D/s to be part of my relationship with a man doesn't mean all of the vanilla attributes go away. It's all part of one big picture.

I think my biggest pet peave is that when I communicate "I'd like to be married, someday". That it is interpretted as in a month.

I think the other part of communication is to not read into what the other is saying. Take what they say at face value.

Just my opinion!

Emerald

(in reply to infyniti)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/3/2005 10:25:10 AM   
AAkasha


Posts: 4429
Joined: 11/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika

quote:

It all makes me wonder... entering into a D/s relationship takes a great deal of communication. How does one NOT include what they are looking for or seeking for the future of their lives?


Just because it requires a great deal of communication, doesn't mean it's going to get the requisite communication and that is most likely why the relationship fails.

- LA


And, sometimes one or both partners will say whatever they think needs to be said to keep the "play" going. Even if it means altering the truth a little.


Akasha

_____________________________

Akasha's Web - All original Femdom content since 1995
Don't email me here, email me at [email protected]

(in reply to LadyAngelika)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/3/2005 10:43:16 AM   
ruffnecksbabygir


Posts: 412
Joined: 1/4/2005
Status: offline
quote:

However, it's been my experience that when you do that men get freaked out.


i'm fully aware that everyone is different, but it has been *my* experience that "vanilla" men tend to run off a lot quicker with the mention of LTR/or Marriage, than men in this lifestyle...again, i am not generalizing all men or anything, i am speaking out of my own experiences with both vanilla men and men who are in this lifestyle. i have always noticed that men into D/s are a little bit more prone to seek serious relationships, know what they want and not be scared away by committment, rather they seek LTR's and sometimes even push for it. That's not to say there aren't many other men in the lifestyle that don't want a LTR, but i've met more that do than ones that don't.

_____________________________

~hugs~
Babygirl

:Disclaimer: The above is only this slave's opinion:

"And Those Who Danced Were Thought To Be Quite Insane By Those Who Could Not Hear The Music" -- Angela Monet

(in reply to Emmmrld)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/3/2005 1:01:57 PM   
BlkTallFullfig


Posts: 5585
Joined: 6/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Emmmrld
For instance, I want a long term relationship, one that eventually leads to marriage (and a family). For some reason men seem to think that means I want them to put a ring on my finger the first time we meet and be married by the second. UM NO.
I think my biggest pet peave is that when I communicate "I'd like to be married, someday". That it is interpretted as in a month.
Emerald

I know exactly what you mean; fortunately, I don't ever mention marriage anymore; we don't talk about it unless he brings it up... It is best to hold off the marriage talk because it scares people, but I suppose it's best to know sooner than later if he is afraid of committment.
Wonder what Merc thinks about this? M

_____________________________

a.k.a. SexyBossyBBW
""Touching was, and still is, and will always be, the true revolution" Nikki Giovanni

(in reply to Emmmrld)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/3/2005 6:32:05 PM   
LadyAngelika


Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika

quote:

It all makes me wonder... entering into a D/s relationship takes a great deal of communication. How does one NOT include what they are looking for or seeking for the future of their lives?


Just because it requires a great deal of communication, doesn't mean it's going to get the requisite communication and that is most likely why the relationship fails.

- LA


And, sometimes one or both partners will say whatever they think needs to be said to keep the "play" going. Even if it means altering the truth a little.


Akasha


Yup. I was guilty of that in the past. But now I have self-esteem ;)

- LA

_____________________________

Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove

(in reply to AAkasha)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/4/2005 12:38:27 PM   
infyniti


Posts: 37
Joined: 8/13/2004
Status: offline
Wow.... it seems that there are more females out there looking for the LTR than there are males? I have to wonder if it is an age thing? Are there Dom's out there also posting for a LTR? I have been in this lifestyle long enough to know many Dom's who are " Husbands, Fathers, Coaches, Mentors" for the world to see and who are only looking for either an on line submissive to fill a void in their lives or maybe what I call a " weekday playmate or week end warrior" for play when their schedule allows. But then again some submissives are happy with that. On the other hand, then they complain that the relationship isn't " going anywhere", but where can a relationship like that go, exactly?
Or...... does it break down to the self esteem issue and we all just learn to " settle" for what we can get?

Feeling glad I waited and didn't settle..... but then again I was 38 when I found " Mr. Dom Right"

Peace
infyniti

(in reply to infyniti)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/4/2005 1:28:01 PM   
Emmmrld


Posts: 57
Joined: 4/21/2005
From: Las Vegas, Nevada
Status: offline
Interesting babbygirl.

It's usually, in my experience, the men in the community that run the other way at the word commitment or LTR. Probably depends on where you live I would guess.

I was very active in the BDSM community. Two years ago walked away lock stock and barrel. Didn't mean I wasn't kinky - that never goes away. I just had better luck dating vanilla men than kinky men.

*shrug*

I came back to widden my dating pool. The pickings in Vegas are slim.

Thanks for the feedback.

:)

Em

(in reply to ruffnecksbabygir)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/4/2005 1:30:19 PM   
Emmmrld


Posts: 57
Joined: 4/21/2005
From: Las Vegas, Nevada
Status: offline
infyniti,

I think that's part of my issue - I will not settle.

I'd rather find a life partner and not be submissive to him than have some mediocre relationship with someone who is dominant.

I've done a lot of soul searching and looking into what I want.

Em

(in reply to infyniti)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/4/2005 1:37:30 PM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
quote:

I think my biggest pet peave is that when I communicate "I'd like to be married, someday". That it is interpretted as in a month. <Emerald>


quote:

It is best to hold off the marriage talk because it scares people. <BTF>


"Scares people"? I think you meant to say it scares men. For many pragmatic reasons it should. There is no equality of the sexes in divorce settlements. In California at least, regardless of any change in the financial situation of the man, until death or until some other poor sucker comes along, the ex is "entitled" to a monthly stipend. Add children to the equation and, in effect, the man is working so his ex and kids can live in the manner that he was stupid enough to make for them in the first place. Of course if the female is a convicted felon or a drug addict, MAYBE he can get custody or more liberal visitation rights.

I think the "fear of commitment" argument is a rationalization on the woman's part. A man is not afraid to commit, but his commitment, set by social "standards" and expectations, have greater consequences then any made by a woman entering into marriage. Now we have "pre-nuptial" agreements. I see and appreciate them but to me they fall into the same classification as design obsolesce. Trump's previous marriage had a clause that said if Marla Maples (anyone remember her?) stayed with him from 1 to 5 years she received $5 Million. If he divorced her her after that she'd be entitled to the "standard" settlement. So it was a business decision to divorce her in the 4th year. How romantic huh? But practical!

Marriage seems to be more a relationship GOAL for a woman. Men see the relationship itself as a goal. On the surface it doesn't appear to be a significant difference. Except, and here is were long ago personal experience rears it's ugly head, once the goal is obtained for woman they commonly see the "race won" and the competition over. Once the tape is broken at the end of the race, few continue to "train". There is no distinction here, vanilla or lifestyle, I've seen it happen. There's a joke that best illustrates the point. "Why is a bride smiling when she's walking down the aisle?" - "Because she knows she given the LAST blow job she'll ever have to give."

Men fall deeply in love with woman and marry them hoping they'll never change. Hoping that the fantastic relationship that caused him to feel drawn to marry her would only evolve to something even stronger after marriage. Woman commonly say, I'll change him once we're married. I'm make him dress different. I'll get him to help with the cleaning. I'll cut down his nights out with the guys.

Just as you should take an honest and hard look and assess your motives when you want to be a slave, submissive, Master, Mistress, Dom or Domme; you must take the same honest assessment prior to becoming a spouse. Why is marriage a goal? Commitment? Social Acceptance? Family Acceptance? Personal Identity? What are the anticipated changes in your day to day relationship with the other person? What will be better? How? Are your motives selfish?

Taking the subject from the lifestyle perspective and it becomes a semantic argument. beth and I are not married, yet I feel more committed to her as my slave then I ever was to my ex. It took many years to find her, she is VERY special and unique. she can keep my pace, is stimulating both emotionally and intellectual, and she's the sexiest woman I've ever known. I have no doubt in her, and she has none in me. Our collar means more to us then any ring either of us wore with a past spouse. Yet, there is talk of marriage between us.

Why? Well, the #1 reason is that beth and I LOVE parties and it's a GREAT excuse for a having a GREAT party. Reason #2, I want to do it for beth. It's my idea, although as a self proclaimed "good witch" maybe it's part of the "spell" she has over me. Pragmatically we could use the tax break. Also pragmatically, it will enable her to be covered with my benefits, and make it easier to take care of her in the long term should something happen to me. Yes, after all the negativity about the institution, I am THAT sure about beth.

Why not let it happen and let the person you are in a relationship be that sure about you?

quote:

DISCLAIMER: This opinion speaks in generalizations. It is NOT intended to be taken in absolute, nor are exceptions consider impossible. Anecdotal conversations with woman illustrate to me that generally; "MEN ARE SLIME". They abandon their wifes and babies, drink, take drugs, and generally shirk their responsibilities.

That said, I have pre-drilled holes in my hands and feet and gotten my old heavy cross out of storage and am fully prepared for the crucifixion to come.

(in reply to BlkTallFullfig)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/4/2005 11:03:17 PM   
BlkTallFullfig


Posts: 5585
Joined: 6/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth
"Scares people"? I think you meant to say it scares men.

Yes I did. You wouldn't believe some of the losers afraid of being trapped?
quote:

In California at least, regardless of any change in the financial situation of the man, until death or until some other poor sucker comes along, the ex is "entitled" to a monthly stipend. Add children to the equation and, in effect, the man is working so his ex and kids can live in the manner that he was stupid enough to make for them in the first place. Of course if the female is a convicted felon or a drug addict, MAYBE he can get custody or more liberal visitation rights.

Yikes Merc, you sound like you've got baggage there, LOL.
You're right it isn't fair, and I'm not a proponent of Alimony (unless one partner forced the other to stop working, in order to serve 24/7) after separation of everything; Of course I support laws for child support.

I understand your sob story Merc, but plenty of women have been unwittingly screwed by men who make less/no money, and by the court systems who protect parental rights regardless of weather the parent wanst/deserves the right.

quote:

Marriage seems to be more a relationship GOAL for a woman. Except, and here is were long ago personal experience rears it's ugly head, once the goal is obtained for woman they commonly see the "race won" and the competition over. Once the tape is broken at the end of the race, few continue to "train". There's a joke that best illustrates the point. "Why is a bride smiling when she's walking down the aisle?" - "Because she knows she given the LAST blow job she'll ever have to give."
Well, I'd like to say that is a bunch of Crock; maybe she stopped giving him BJs because he started treating her like his free maid service, and started thinking that manners and baths are optional. LOL.
You know a large sector of the population has married women working full time, coming home cooking/cleaning/caring for the kids, and handing over her paycheck at the end of the week? I've begun looking for a wife like that myself (again, one with a penis).

quote:

Men fall deeply in love with woman and marry them hoping they'll never change.

Oh You forgot some of the male thinking before marriage: "nightly phucking without first paying for dinner; in fact maybe even BJ without any gifts/walks on the beach as foreplay."

quote:

Woman commonly say, I'll change him once we're married. I'm make him dress different. I'll get him to help with the cleaning. I'll cut down his nights out with the guys.

Guilty of that mindset in the past; don't know what I was thinking. Now if I actually met a man who wanted to be together all the time, it would drive me insane. He'd better have some friends, and of course he will be doing most if not all of the housework.

quote:

Why is marriage a goal? Commitment? Social Acceptance? Family Acceptance? Personal Identity? Are your motives selfish?

Marriage/commitment are the ultimate show of respect for the woman with whom you are sleeping in a lot of cultures; so yes I suppose it is for family/social acceptance.
Good questions; no longer applicable to me since I'm not terribly fond of the institution myself. I respect it when it's done right. My mom and dad had a marriage I can envy.

quote:

I feel more committed to her as my slave then I ever was to my ex. It took many years to find her, she is VERY special and unique. she can keep my pace, is stimulating both emotionally and intellectual, and she's the sexiest woman I've ever known. I have no doubt in her, and she has none in me. Our collar means more to us then any ring either of us wore with a past spouse. Yet, there is talk of marriage between us.

Why? Well, the #1 reason is that beth and I LOVE parties and it's a GREAT excuse for a having a GREAT party. Reason #2, I want to do it for beth. It's my idea, although as a self proclaimed "good witch" maybe it's part of the "spell" she has over me.

Awesome, and I'll expect an invitation. I'm sure Beth is the greatest, but the other reason I bet is that you aren't as cynical as you'd have us believe when it comes to love/commitment from a gentleMan to his Lady. M


_____________________________

a.k.a. SexyBossyBBW
""Touching was, and still is, and will always be, the true revolution" Nikki Giovanni

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/5/2005 4:47:11 AM   
LadyAngelika


Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

it seems that there are more females out there looking for the LTR than there are males?


I'm not looking for an LTR actually. If an opportunity comes along, I might go for it, but I'm really not looking. I'm having fun being single in terms of committed relationships with a harem of boys.

- LA

_____________________________

Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove

(in reply to infyniti)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/5/2005 4:51:29 AM   
LadyAngelika


Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BlkTallFullfig

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth
"Scares people"? I think you meant to say it scares men.

Yes I did. You wouldn't believe some of the losers afraid of being trapped?


Man! That must make me a loser then! Or a man...

In all seriousness, I do have a fear of being trapped in the wrong relationship. Only because it has happened to me in the past. Of course you can always break it off. But it's tricky. I'm not saying I will never commit. I'm just saying that I really won't settle.

- LA

_____________________________

Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove

(in reply to BlkTallFullfig)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/5/2005 5:43:16 AM   
BlkTallFullfig


Posts: 5585
Joined: 6/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika
quote:

ORIGINAL: BlkTallFullfig
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth
"Scares people"? I think you meant to say it scares men.

Yes I did. You wouldn't believe some of the losers afraid of being trapped?

Man! That must make me a loser then! Or a man...

I meant that there are people out there with very little to offer in terms of looks, charisma, fun in the sack, or wealth, but are somehow paranoind someone is going to trap them into marriage; to which I simply roll my eyes and walk away, since that's the less harmful of the choices (the other being to break down the truth to them).
As for your being a man, what you do in your boudoir is none of my biz.

quote:

I do have a fear of being trapped in the wrong relationship. Only because it has happened to me in the past. Of course you can always break it off. I'm not saying I will never commit. I'm just saying that I really won't settle.
- LA

Oh you don't need to explain to me, I've been there, and breaking it off is usually a bigger pain in the arse than I'm willing to deal with.
I would commit anyday, just don't need a written contract for it. M

< Message edited by BlkTallFullfig -- 5/5/2005 5:45:30 AM >


_____________________________

a.k.a. SexyBossyBBW
""Touching was, and still is, and will always be, the true revolution" Nikki Giovanni

(in reply to LadyAngelika)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/5/2005 6:50:15 AM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
quote:

Yikes Merc, you sound like you've got baggage there, LOL.


BTF,
Not at all. Fortunately my divorce was in NJ. But hearing the stories of my CA friends makes me wonder why the gay population is fighting so hard for the "privilege". CA already has "palimony" laws so even dating long term can result in having to pay for the privilege of leaving. And money is not the focus. EVERYTHING monetary or derived from money can be replaced. The emotional and mental angst leading to the divorce is far more difficult. I hate failure. I have convictions. I stand behind my commitments. In my case it took a VERY traumatic occurrence to end to the toleration of being in a miserable marriage. Once the lawyers (okay, I do have lawyer baggage but it's unrelated to divorce) have picked through the carcass, final divorce papers are cause for celebration at least equal to the wedding party.

I'm not cynical at all, but I am a pragmatist. I think people's prior behavior should be a good indication of future behavior. Lying by pre-marital behavior DID happen to me. I'll admit to having "baggage" when it comes to that too. There are lying "losers" of both sexes, no doubt. But when it comes to marriage or counseling people about marriage, I'll direct their focus to one thing, failure may be the fault of both or either partner, but in 99% of the cases the man pays for the failure. If, beyond the blindness of love, a man realizes this and gets married then he should go for it. Pragmatically that's just the way it is. Maybe that was the succinct response to the query. I don't see any cynicism in that

Besides, you know why divorce is so expensive? It's worth it!

(in reply to BlkTallFullfig)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/5/2005 11:55:25 AM   
BlkTallFullfig


Posts: 5585
Joined: 6/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth
I think people's prior behavior should be a good indication of future behavior. Lying by pre-marital behavior DID happen to me. I'll admit to having "baggage" when it comes to that too. There are lying "losers" of both sexes, no doubt. But when it comes to marriage or counseling people about marriage, I'll direct their focus to one thing, failure may be the fault of both or either partner, but in 99% of the cases the man pays for the failure.

No doubt prior behavior is an indicator of future behavior, and whenever a relationship fails for me, it's definitely not because I'm seeing something for the first time, it's usually been a situation where I've seen problems and decided not to trust my instincts and run sooner rather than later... Oh well, life is indeed one big phucking lesson; a lesson that provides continual suffering if one doesn't take responsibility for one's contribution in creating wrecks (as I've done in the past).
Do men suffer more in divorce? I don't know; I think that if indeed men behave like slime by lying and cheating more (you know like your "men are slime disclaimer") than they should suffer, but I realize that my stats are skewed since I've only dated and married men.

quote:

Besides, you know why divorce is so expensive? It's worth it!

Absolutely agree, otherwise jail would be a better option. M

_____________________________

a.k.a. SexyBossyBBW
""Touching was, and still is, and will always be, the true revolution" Nikki Giovanni

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/5/2005 4:18:22 PM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
quote:

jail would be a better option. M


Which leads to another consideration.

For all those is sex-less, unhappy, boring marriages or relationships (I think there are at least 3 current threads on the subject) and have a 15 year anniversary coming up. Based upon national statistics, the average jail time served for the murder of a spouse is 12-15 years. So remember, if those many years ago, you killed the person versus married them, you'd be free now.

(in reply to BlkTallFullfig)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/5/2005 4:25:20 PM   
RiotGirl


Posts: 3149
Status: offline
possibly it all means the sme to everyone

even if everyoe has their own perspective

but intentions change.

maybe they MENT LTR in the begining

and then they got to know you

sometime they just withhold information because they feel like it

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094