hisannabelle -> RE: Humiliation tattoo (5/6/2007 11:20:43 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: knownobody quote:
here we go with the true again. Sorry, I guess there was no need to use the word "true"; I wasn't implying anything by doing so. The point I was trying to make, which only one person who has contributed to the thread seems to have grasped, is that a masochist being forced to have such a tattoo is not necessarily a victim, and should not be looked upon as such, which is the way everyone seems to be viewing it. It may be something he/she would quite willing undergo or even desire. Of course, in this case, we don't know the specifcs one way or the other. like i said, it's his cavalier attitude about it that bothers me. i have no problems with permanent markings. i could probably understand a permanent marking like this, but he acts like the consequences don't matter since he won't be there for them. -that- bothers me more than whatever word he wants tattooed on whatever prominent place, and that really has nothing to do with how masochistic his slave is. i don't see his slave as a victim, personally; she's the one who signed up for it. however, one of his posts implies that that must relieve him of all responsibility, which bespeaks further immaturity to me. annabelle.
|
|
|
|