LadyPact
Posts: 32566
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SthrnCom4t I don't think Otters said it was anyone else's job to give another manhood, nor that anyone other than self could do the hard work or self analysis leading to evolution. I read it as offering insight into where some individuals might be coming from. It didn't seem to me an excuse to deflect responsibility. Indeed, we are each responsible to meet our own needs. I would propose that by interacting and having direct experience, the lessons are much more powerful than reading about the concepts in a book or watching a video. I am the queen of self-help books, so I'm not knocking their usefulness, but direct feedback with an emotionally intelligent person is invaluable. I've often found it useful to interact with others by trying to understand their motives, (which I believe was the intent of the OP) and as such, I don't take most actions/reactions as a personal affront. It allows me to be more like the pole, when others around me are being swept around like tether balls.Usually, realizing how little we actually do influence/control other people, allows us to disconnect from feeling poorly in light of their behavior. Is Dominance really about control, or is it about Inspiration/Motivation? SomethingCatchy, I think you are absolutely right that someone who is not self-motivated, isn't going to be changed by someone else. However, if a submissive reads Otters' post, and it turns on a light bulb of, 'hey, I can relate to that. Maybe that's the 'unrealized' wall I've been hitting internally," it might prove to be useful. Likewise, a Woman who recognizes it, and offers it as feedback, might give the impression of being a wise woman worthy of granting 'inspirational access.' Just my two cents :) The highlighted above is what prompted My previous response. While I am Dominant, I am not everyone's Dominant. Of course, in My own dynamic, it would be My hope that there would be growth. This is the case whether the person who has submitted to My authority is doing this as his first experience with D/s, in which he is first learning about his submission, or he has prior experience in a power dynamic before. I've never been one to expect complete surrender from day one. The kind of trust and faith that an individual needs for that to happen isn't necessarily automatic. My preference has always been to earn that over time. I find it very similar to the concept of loving someone. In most cases, we are not "in love" with someone that we first meet, but if we do love them, that love can deepen and strengthen every day as time goes on. Such as it can be with submission. However, this is a much greater investment. Not something that is going to happen just because two people run across each other with the opposing labels. There are some exceptions to this, of course. I'm sure every Dominant woman out there who happens to be active in their kink community has run across that 'new' submissive male that she takes under her wing, solely because there was something about him that she liked on a friendship basis. She may not be actively interested in taking him for her own, but does see the potential in him, so she steps into that role. At the same time, it is worth recognizing that this is not every 'new' submissive's experience. Why this happens from one to another depends on a number of variables. It could be chemistry, personality, or various reasons why one person finds that people are more willing to work with one person more than another. With this, both scenarios are entirely possible, which is why neither one or the other should be the one expected.
_____________________________
The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie. Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread
|