marieToo
Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006 From: Jersey Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyJulieAnn quote:
ORIGINAL: TreSwank quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyJulieAnn I'm all for legalizing prostitution, but I don't agree with you that cerebral palsy, amputations, burns, etc. instantly qualify one as being "pitiful" and unable to find a sexual partner without paying for one. Be well, Julie Honey............how many healthy women do you know that would choose an amputee, cerebral palsy sufferer, or a SEVERELY physically handicapped man as a lover? I know 26 year-old men that are virgins simply by merit of their social ineptitude alone, so I can't really imagine that the severely disabled are doing any better at the game of love. Let's face the facts...............................healthy women don't want to fuck the handicapped unless "said" party is an individual of vast financial means. I thank God everyday that I don't have anything wrong with me except for inveterate flakiness and a pack-a-day cigarette habit. You have a very narrow-minded view of the world, my friend. I agree that people that look different have a more difficult time in this world, but do not count them out. 1) The conditions you mention have varying degress of severity. There are people around with cerebral palsy and amputations that go unnoticed because their conditions are mild or because of adaptive technology. 2) Some people actually stay with their partners even after something bad happens to them. Imagine that. Love that lasts... 3) Touch is a need, but it doesn't have to be the sexual touch of a prostitute. 4) I don't know that stats, but I doubt there are a lot of severely handicapped people going to prostitutes. So I say legalize prostitution in general. It's not necessary to use the "handicapped" and "lonely" as justification, in my opinion. Be well, Julie Well-said.
_____________________________
marie. I give good agita.
|