Fat... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


allyC -> Fat... (5/8/2005 4:55:03 PM)

Hi everyone :)

I was recently reading a thread about bbw models and fetish wear and I noticed that one person used the term "fat model" and several people were upset by the use of the word fat... 6 months ago, I would have been too.

I started using this word more frequently, consciuosly thinking of it as it is actually defined rather than a derogatory thing. Fat is pretty much the opposite of thin. If you are not thin or average, by definition, you are fat. No negative or positive - just a neutral word to describe a person's size. By viewing it that way, the word lost its power and simply became a word.

I am fat. :) No biggie (pun intended)

How many people of size here are offended by the word? Have you ever considered taking it back?

I'm just curious as for me, it has been quite a liberating experience to take it back and render it powerless.




FelinePersuasion -> RE: Fat... (5/8/2005 6:42:25 PM)

It was more of the nastyness of the tone. allyC. I call myself fat cat and joke about how fat I am however I am being the one to say it and I am not being mean to myself or about myself. I say I am joe's fat cat and he don't need no budda belly stature's he's got his own lil buda to wub.




ManOwner -> RE: Fat... (5/8/2005 6:55:04 PM)

It's one of those words that just has a ton of semantic baggage attached. Therefore, it affects the hearer in an emotional manner that may be completely inconsistent with the speaker's intent. Our culture makes value judgments about individuals based on how much fat is on their bodies. If you have been overweight in your life, and I have, then you probably know what it's like to experience the most virulent hatred human beings are capable of. If the word offends lots of people, then I find it is often best to simply acquiesce and stop using it rather than try to debate the point.




darkprincess21 -> RE: Fat... (5/8/2005 7:28:24 PM)

I have been "fat" my entire life but I have never experienced a bit of hatred or dislike because of it and I've never really been judged based on that. I call myself fat and I've never taken that word to be some horrible insult. Anyways, its all in who you choose to surround yourself with. Make any sense?




sissymaidlola -> RE: the most virulent hatred human beings are capable of (5/8/2005 8:17:53 PM)

quote:

If you have been overweight in your life, and I have, then you probably know what it's like to experience the most virulent hatred human beings are capable of.

Hi ManOwner,

sissy Doesn't disagree with the sentiments of what you posted, but you may be going a little too far in calling people's general disapproval of obesity "the most virulent hatred human beings are capable of." Not to trivialize your own discomforts with being "gravitationally challenged" (when you were) but the hatred involved in racism, anti-Semitism and homophobia are all much, much worst. For example, the Nazis did not put fat people into concentration camps nor commit genocide against them as a group. In fact, unlike the other three forms of bigotry, they did not persecute people for being obese at all. Furthermore, people's dislike of the overweight of others is NOT bigotry but quite rational (even if it is hurtful to those that are victims of this dislike). No one can control the color of their skin (racism) nor their ethnic origin (anti-Semitism) nor their sexual orientation (homophobia) nor their true gender (transphobia) BUT, for the most part, they can control their own weight.

There are some overweight people that have thyroid problems and others that are "big-boned" but the majority of people that are overweight are that way by their own choice. That still doesn't give others the right to name call obese people over it, nor irrationally and illegally discriminate against them where weight is not a pertinent factor (e.g., not hiring an overweight person as a computer programmer when he can do the job but the employer just doesn't approve of his being fat IS discrimination, but not hiring an overweight person as a Kentucky Derby jockey IS NOT discrimination!). But the bottom line is that those people that are self-disciplined and do things in moderation and take pride in their appearance and presentation (all of which takes considerable effort) tend to resent the laziness, lack of discipline, and avarice implied by the overweight condition. For most of history "fat" has implied in the Judaeo-Christian world, to greater or lesser extent, three of the seven deadly sins ... avarice or greed, gluttony and sloth.

It is not a deadly sin to be effeminate, to be homosexual, to hold different religious beliefs, to have a darker skin tone, nor to be handicapped. These are all just examples of human variety and diversity. But to take three times as much food as everyone else when sat at table with them is socially unacceptable (it's considered to be both greedy and gluttonous) and to lie in bed an extra hour longer than someone who gets up and works out so that he remains trim is also socially unacceptable (it's considered to be slothful). That doesn't mean that any particular "fat" person is necessarily guilty of any of those things, but that is the basis of the bias and value judgments made by others WRT their negativity towards "fat" people, and although those judgments may be ill-founded in any particular instance, they are NOT irrational, but have sound cause! OTOH, it is completely irrational to hate someone because they are confined to a wheelchair, black or Hispanic, gay or lesbian, Jewish or Islamic, or are bi-gendered, transgendered, or intersexed. That makes for a big, big difference in the source of the discrimination even if it is all equally hurtful when one is on the receiving end.

Respectfrilly Yours,

sissy maid lola


[image]local://upfiles/21203/7550AAD373274EA8911F0BC3852D002C.jpg[/image]




ManOwner -> RE: the most virulent hatred human beings are capable of (5/8/2005 9:13:08 PM)

Lola, that's the exact viewpoint I am challenging in a paper I am currently working on. I thoroughly disagree with you, not that I don't appreciate the validity of your statements.




EmeraldSlave2 -> RE: Fat... (5/8/2005 9:15:56 PM)

Oh god I prefer fat ten times than BBW, that makes me want to gag.

I am often curious why there seem to be an inordinate amount of heavily fat people in the scene, but that's just how it is.

Please, call me fat!




sissymaidlola -> RE: Please, call me fat! (5/8/2005 9:25:32 PM)

quote:

Please, call me fat!

OK, sissy's up for this one .... Emerald, you're a big, fat bitch!

How was that ? Did that work for you ?

sissy maid lola


[image]local://upfiles/21203/7550AAD373274EA8911F0BC3852D002C.jpg[/image]




EmeraldSlave2 -> RE: Please, call me fat! (5/8/2005 9:29:10 PM)

Hmm "bitch" is a completely different thing altogether. I don't enjoy the term and don't consider it something positive. I can't really tell if you're just being teasing or serious though, so no biggie.




sissymaidlola -> RE: I thoroughly disagree with you (5/8/2005 9:39:08 PM)

quote:

Lola, that's the exact viewpoint I am challenging in a paper I am currently working on. I thoroughly disagree with you, not that I don't appreciate the validity of your statements.

So what is your counter-argument (or the gist of your paper, if you prefer) ?

sissy maid lola


[image]local://upfiles/21203/7550AAD373274EA8911F0BC3852D002C.jpg[/image]




sissymaidlola -> RE: I don't enjoy the term (5/8/2005 9:51:44 PM)

quote:

Hmm "bitch" is a completely different thing altogether. I don't enjoy the term and don't consider it something positive. I can't really tell if you're just being teasing or serious though, so no biggie.

Hmm, maybe sissy should have used some "LOL" icons in his post. [;)]

sissy Was only teasing ... he couldn't resist your open invitation <giggles>. But he felt he had to use "fat" as an adjective which then opens up the question of what to use as a noun. sissy Chose "bitch" because it is less offensive to most people than many other alternatives but he fully appreciates your feelings about it. Let sissy know what you would prefer instead and he'll edit his post.

Then we can both delete these subsequent posts and it will all be like it never happened! [:D]

Regards,

sissy maid lola


[image]local://upfiles/21203/7550AAD373274EA8911F0BC3852D002C.jpg[/image]




BlkTallFullfig -> RE: Fat... (5/8/2005 11:16:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ManOwner
Our culture makes value judgments about individuals based on how much fat is on their bodies. If you have been overweight in your life, and I have, then you probably know what it's like to experience the most virulent hatred human beings are capable of. If the word offends lots of people, then I find it is often best to simply acquiesce and stop using it

I agree completely. There is simply too much negativity associated with the word; it's definitely seen culturally as a bad word.
Other cultures use the equivalent of strong to describe a bigger person, but here there is no doubt, the word is associated with ill health/looks.
I have accustomed myself to not being overly sensitive to the word fat, but I don't describe myself as fat, unless I'm deliberately being self deprecating. I describe myself as big, large, BBW (because indeed I am), or curvaceous, amazonian, etc.
Recently someone tried to insult me with those very words (my size and color), it backfired when I admired the person's ability to state the obvious. The person came back with more virulent words calling me out of my name, but fat is not fighting word to me. I definitely don't call anyone by their size, nor do I comment on it, because I consider it bad manners. I feel that unless someone asks you what you think about their size, or to carry them, clothe them, feed them, than what size the person is, is absolutely none of your business.. M




BlkTallFullfig -> RE: the most virulent hatred human beings are capable of (5/8/2005 11:26:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sissymaidlola
But the bottom line is that those people that are self-disciplined and do things in moderation and take pride in their appearance and presentation (all of which takes considerable effort) tend to resent the laziness, lack of discipline, and avarice implied by the overweight condition.

That is just BS judgemental assumptions about people who are bigger.
It is very narrow to think oneself more wonderful, more disciplined and more beautiful simply because may you wake up at a certain time, eat less than you may want (frequently acting bitchy because of low blood sugar), and go to the gym. I have family members who have thin genes, eat more/exercise less and are in worse shape than some of the bigger people in my family... You can hardly conclude all of the above based on size alone.
That statement that you can never be too rich or too thin is false; one often comes from plain greed if not theft (unless you're born into it), and the second also happens frequently before one dies.
quote:

For most of history "fat" has implied in the Judaeo-Christian world, to greater or lesser extent, three of the seven deadly sins ... avarice or greed, gluttony and sloth.

I hope you're kidding, because if not, I think that is plain Bullshit.
When you are from a poor country where there isn't enough food, being bigger meant that you were financially/socially better off than most. I definitely don't recall the priest or any part of catechism stating we had to be thin, and go to the gym regularly.
God did not intend for all of us to be the same size.

quote:

It is not a deadly sin to be effeminate, to be homosexual, to hold different religious beliefs, to have a darker skin tone, nor to be handicapped.

[sm=lol.gif] LMAO, must be nice not to be cursed with a deadly sin; would you change if your Xdressing was a deadly sin?

I hate these size arguments, because they always inevitably become reduced to "I like this, and this is what's right", and some poor folks making excuses for why they are the way they are....
I will NEVER appologize for being bigger, and wish all women who are naturally curvaceous (natural appearing) would tell the establishment to kiss our collective behinds. M




FangsNfeet -> RE: Fat... (5/8/2005 11:37:32 PM)

I like cushion for the pushin. Though I may not be what's called a Tubby Chaser I don't go for size 2 models, Olive Oils, and vicroria secret models. I'm more of a Lane Bryant person when it comes to physical attraction.

So let's take the word FAT. Why isn't it called Curvacious or Pleasently Plump? My how I love to see a little jiggle in the jam





allyC -> RE: the most virulent hatred human beings are capable of (5/8/2005 11:41:25 PM)

quote:

"Furthermore, people's dislike of the overweight of others is NOT bigotry but quite rational (even if it is hurtful to those that are victims of this dislike). No one can control the color of their skin (racism) nor their ethnic origin (anti-Semitism) nor their sexual orientation (homophobia) nor their true gender (transphobia) BUT, for the most part, they can control their own weight."

Disliking someone for the way they look is not rational. Its rude, plain and simple. I don't care if it is skin color, disability or weight. Its wrong as far as I am concerned.

quote:

"There are some overweight people that have thyroid problems and others that are "big-boned" but the majority of people that are overweight are that way by their own choice."

Actually a majority of people who are overweight (aside from physical reasons, i.e. genetics and thyroid) are not that way because they choose to be heavy. How many people do you think start their day with "Hey, I'm going to eat as much as I can today because I WANT to be fat!"

The reality is that many people who are grossly overweight are that way because of compulsions caused by serious emotional trauma. Women who are victims of rape often gain serious weight after their ordeals. Children who are molested and abused often grow up with eating disorders. People who suffer from clinical depression and anxiety often become obese over time because these diseases cause obesity in people. It is a clinical fact.

They didn't choose to be fat, anorexic, or bulemic any more than they chose to suffer whatever they went through.

I understand that within each person exists the power to make a change, however, the fact that the power is there doesn't make it easy. In fact, I would say that it can be one of the most difficult things to overcome - especially when the vicious cycle of self loathing is perpetuated by societal hatred.

quote:

"But the bottom line is that those people that are self-disciplined and do things in moderation and take pride in their appearance and presentation (all of which takes considerable effort) tend to resent the laziness, lack of discipline, and avarice implied by the overweight condition."

Therein lies the problem. People automatically assume that heavy people are lazy, lack discipline, and don't take pride in their appearance.

I will never understand that view because I know just as many skinny lazy people as I know big lazy people. I know skinny people who look like they could knock a buzzard of a crap wagon but I don't automatically assume that all skinny people are lazy or don't take pride in their appearance.

I know skinny people who never exercise and who eat, eat, eat and who sleep for 12 hours a day but I don't assume that all skinny people are like that either.

I know many, many heavy people who take serious pride in their appearance (myself included).

People should be judged on their individual merits, accomplishments, and who they are inside - not by the skin they wear. I find it absolutely shallow and ridiculous that anyone would consider another person of lesser value because of what they look like.

quote:

"For most of history "fat" has implied in the Judaeo-Christian world, to greater or lesser extent, three of the seven deadly sins ... avarice or greed, gluttony and sloth."

Well for most of history, the Judaeo-Christian world has viewed homosexuality as an abomination of nature but that doesn't make it acceptable. Prejudice is wrong, period. I see what you're saying here - that for centuries it has been viewed a certain way and I agree, it has been viewed that way. Its still wrong in my opinion and definitely overdue for a change.

quote:

"It is not a deadly sin to be effeminate, to be homosexual, to hold different religious beliefs, to have a darker skin tone, nor to be handicapped. These are all just examples of human variety and diversity. But to take three times as much food as everyone else when sat at table with them is socially unacceptable (it's considered to be both greedy and gluttonous) and to lie in bed an extra hour longer than someone who gets up and works out so that he remains trim is also socially unacceptable (it's considered to be slothful)."


I don't know about you, but I've never dined with a heavy person who took 3 times as much food as anyone else at the dinner table. In fact, I find that (especially in public) most heavy people are very self conscious of what they eat around others because people often stare at them while they eat because they are heavy in the first place.

quote:

That doesn't mean that any particular "fat" person is necessarily guilty of any of those things, but that is the basis of the bias and value judgments made by others WRT their negativity towards "fat" people, and although those judgments may be ill-founded in any particular instance, they are NOT irrational, but have sound cause!


You may think that it has sound cause. I respectfully disagree. There is no sound cause to hate people based on their appearance. I understand the argument that every stereotype has its basis in fact but hating people because of a stereotype is again, wrong in my opinion.

quote:

"OTOH, it is completely irrational to hate someone because they are confined to a wheelchair, black or Hispanic, gay or lesbian, Jewish or Islamic, or are bi-gendered, transgendered, or intersexed. That makes for a big, big difference in the source of the discrimination even if it is all equally hurtful when one is on the receiving end."


The last line says it all. "Equally hurtful when one is on the receiving end."

It is wrong to be hateful like that toward anyone and to say that its "rational" for people to hate anyone based on their appearance is something I just can't agree with.

People are who they are and the sooner society stops looking for fault in our Earth suits and begins to delve deeper into the artistry that IS the human psyche, heart, and spirit, then maybe society, photography, film, the entire art movement and media in general can begin looking at people with clarity and elevating them through loving eyes rather than looking down at them through the myopic glass of societal convention.

Here's something for folks to check out if they'd like...

http://www.moonspheres.com/i.html

Well wishes,

Cav's girl
ally{C}












ginger21 -> RE: the most virulent hatred human beings are capable of (5/9/2005 12:34:58 AM)

Reading that fat people are lazy and skinny people aren't pisses me off to high heaven.

Do I like to sit around the house and eat? Hell yes.
Does my 5'6'' 135lbs roommate like to sit around the house and eat? Hell yes? And as a matter of fact, she eats more ( in quantity and frequency) than I do.

I'm fat, she's not. We're both lazy. Get off it, you skinny bitches. (only half way kidding ^_^)




BlkTallFullfig -> RE: Fat... (5/9/2005 12:35:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FangsNfeet
I'm more of a Lane Bryant person when it comes to physical attraction.
So let's take the word FAT. Why isn't it called Curvacious or Pleasently Plump?

Good for you Fangs... Women are supposed to have some cushion naturally.
I've certainly never been dumped to smaller babes..
I Hate the word fat as well, and am with you on the bodacious babe description. [;)] M




BlkTallFullfig -> The Way It ought to be (5/9/2005 12:40:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: allyC
People are who they are and the sooner society stops looking for fault in our Earth suits and begins to delve deeper into the artistry that IS the human psyche, heart, and spirit, then maybe society, photography, film, the entire art movement and media in general can begin looking at people with clarity and elevating them through loving eyes rather than looking down at them through the myopic glass of societal convention.
ally{C}

Beautifully put Ally. M




FelinePersuasion -> RE: The Way It ought to be (5/9/2005 1:12:47 AM)

I don't like the ones who're super skinny they would break if a good wind came alone. My mate happens to be a stick, But I loved him for the gentleness and kindness I saw in him, not his size. His heart spirit and love are big enough to over come his stickyness 10 fold.

It's usualy the same with over weight people being very giving, but they don't let people in causa the rudies out there.




EmeraldSlave2 -> RE: The Way It ought to be (5/9/2005 5:51:06 AM)

For me it's a very different experience. I do NOT want to be fat, but I have chosen to be. I know I have chosen to be because I do not do the things I KNOW will make me not fat.

I don't see anything wrong in wanting to look and feel better- both of which I know will happen if I lose weight. Yes, I think pressure to be perfect and fit into some mold is bad, and people should not be made to feel less because of their bodies, but I know I would be a happier person if I lost weight.

I also know the Owner prefers not-fat women.

I'm not ready to say that "fatness" is or is a symptom of disease. I understand the health issues involved in people with hormonal imbalances, and I understand the effects of depression on someone. But there's a very small step from saying "most people can't control their weight" to people not TRYING to control their weight.




Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875