Noah
Posts: 1660
Joined: 7/5/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: KatyLied I firmly believe that if someone is not adult enough, confident enough, and knowledgeable enough to choose her own partner for a relationship then perhaps she needs to rethink the entire searching thing and wait until she is ready to function as an adult. Otherwise in her naivete she is open to any fool who wants to use her, under the guise of "training" and "preparing" her. .... but of course if she were to take your advice and eschew the sreeening, she'd be letting you do her thinking for her, right? You said in an earlier post that this sort of training is manipulation, which it is. But then so is every other sort of training. Manipulation can be good, bad or value-neutral. Do the anti-trainers piping up here believe that there are no positive lessons which can be learned in one relationship and applied productively in a subsequent relationship, kinky or otherwise? And if this sort of thing can happen, as it were, accidentally-in-the-usual-course-of-things, why on earth should we think it couldn't be undertaken intentionally? This forum, indeed this thread, is packed with advice, practical and theoretical. Some of it is surely advice that a neophyte could benefit from internalizing. Is it unconscionable to share good advice in person in a mentoring context? Why? Is it just unimaginable that an experienced couple couple could help a begginer explore her gag reflex and her curtsy? Her inhibitions and limits and curiousities? And if her eventual dom doesn't give a crap about curtsies and (like me) gets a big kick out of gagging, well doesn't he have to be a real puke of a person if he can't appreciate his partners previous efforts, intensions, and diligence--even as he "re-trains" her to his taste? Of course subbie training can address things far more nuanced and subtle than these. In the present climate, though, it seems imprudent to even suggest them, let alone detail them. Those with the relevant experience have some idea what I'm talking about. Mightn't it possibly be a Very Good Idea for some people, sometimes, to sort through some of this unfamiliar-to-them kinky stuff in a safe setting in which all parties care about one another but which isn't shot-through with the tensions and trials of trying to make a long-term significant-other type relationship work? Experienced people help newbs learn about camping and swimming and first aid and negotiating and stamp collecting and every other damn thing. One of the modes available for any of these learning experiences is that of personal mentoring. Is BDSM so terribly, terribly special that it stands apart from all aspects of the human condition to which training can apply? If one of us believes that no human being could engage productively and generously in mentoring then perhaps that person should not engage in mentoring. Kind of reminds me of the the way liars tend to be more likely than others to doubt the veracity of whatever they are told. Will an interval of training like the one referred to in the OP result in the Universal Perfect Subbie? I'm absolutely confident that neither the trainers nor the trainee from the OP thought so, so why should anyone else attack such a silly notion (which no one has proposed)? Without doubt, if any of us believe that there is no room for unfair advantage-taking under the guise of training, well they are just being silly. But in my experience, people of good will can interact with integrity in all sorts of ways, including the very sort of training under discussion here. Congratulations to the (OP) trainers and the trainee for carving out a space of trust in a world that can be pretty dodgey, and using that space to accomplish something mutually beneficial. Isn't it fun to be the person who has done the very thing that someone (I won't mention his name or anything) is busy screaming can't be done at all?
< Message edited by Noah -- 5/14/2007 8:49:26 PM >
|