Griswold
Posts: 2739
Joined: 2/12/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: aviinterra Today there is this article on the homepage of msn.com about penmenship being an outdated skill, primarily cursive writing. A few months ago I saw a similar article trying to presuade the reader that well...reading is just over rated too and we should strive to teach our children only the bare minimum so that they can type and text and fill out forms at work. I have noticed that while a lot of people laugh at this, there is a dramatic decline in these areas already among the younger generations. I know of so few people in my age and younger who will out of sheer pleasure take up a novel writen 200 years ago and actually understand and enjoy it. I could not believe some of the things that are on my younger sister's summer reading lists- Anne Rice, the Da Vinci Code, etc. All best sellers and good authors in their own right- but none of these books will encourage a young reader to seek out a dictionary nor learn the more exquisite forms of the English language. That, and many can argue about the quality of writing in many modern books. Don't believe me that most young people can't write? Go to any teenage forum and try to decipher the "sms-speak" that dominates those posts. So, in a few decades of this dumbing down, when handwriting is completely replaced by typing or voice recognition, and holding a pen or writing a letter raises eyebrows, will we still argue that we are moving forward, that we are somehow more educated than our ancestors? How will all of this play when it comes to our freedoms, when the future might not even be able to read the Constitution? Will technology in the end turn all of us into uneducated peasants? Uhmmm...to be kind...I believe you've just answered your own question (if in fact there actually was one).
|