Aswad
Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: CitizenCane 'Explicit prior consent' may be the hallmark of 'lifestyle BDSM', but it's not necessarily a prominent or even present aspect of D/s. Fair enough. By that logic, wife-beating would appear to be a subset of D/s, though, unless the wife leaves. Which is rarely the case. quote:
First of all, the term 'Explicit' is something that tends only to be useful in a narrowly defined situation- as, for instance, a BDSM 'play' session, where people can agree in advance on the minutest details of their interaction in the scene. In the open-ended context of a long-term relationship based on dominance and submission, it's not practical. By "explicit", I mean "actually communicated", as opposed to "taken for granted". It is possible to explicitly (in that sense) give prior informed consent to entering into open-ended slavery in a dictionary-definition sense of the word. quote:
Power imbalances exist in all relationships, the distinguishing feature of D/s is that they are formalized and actively embraced- and this combination generally involves a great deal of ritualization. Yes. And "formalized" carries much the same connotation as what I mean by "explicit". As for ritualization, I've seen people do it with and without. quote:
Wife beating is certainly about dominance and submission, but it lacks the formal aspects of what we recognize as D/s. ~nod~
_____________________________
"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind. From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way. We do." -- Rorschack, Watchmen.
|