RE: Blocked for no good reason?

RE: Blocked for no good reason? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

MasterLordguru -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 6:22:58 AM)
Thank you katy... perahaps I should take a whole day and follow a few threads. I think that would be entertaining. Unfourntely, I have lacked the time and patience sometimes to read through the much and mire that appears here. but I have to say.. today Its been fun. Althouh.. its 70 degrees outside and I really should go and enjoy the Sun. by the way.. Sometimes I read and dont post. But today.. I was in that kind of mood. Thanks for making me feel welcomed.

MistressDarling -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 6:23:40 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MellowSir and as for "lack of training", well common courtesies are lacking in some, really, how long does it take to type "no thanks" and send it? 2 minutes maybe? lol , some have the time to constantly be here but can't find the 2 minutes, hmmmm, funny that I expect the same treatment I give, I can find the time to reply even if I'm not interested, guess the golden rule is disregarded a bit too easily..... On an average day, I receive 30 messages from Dominants and submissives. If I replied to every single on of them, it would take an hour (assuming your two minute reply theory is accurate). I'm a busy gal. That hour can be put to better use. Furthermore, If I DO send a "No, thank you" message, nearly half of the time, I get a snarky reply. "Fine then. I didn't want you anyway, fat ass!" More often than not, I get the men who won't take No for an answer. Its a waste of my time to even bother. My situation is similar to almost every uncollared submissive on CM. We are bombarded with emails from men daily. It gets tiring after a while. And it SUCKS even moreso when they take our non-response personally. So, on behalf of all of us: Don't take it personally! If she doesn't reply, she isn't interested. There is no need to send multiple emails.

sambamanslilgirl -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 6:23:55 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MellowSir and you know what, look around and you'll see that women tend to prefer jerks anyway because there are sure a lot with just that. wow - what a blanket assumption

MstrssPassion -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 6:24:29 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: happypervert quote: ORIGINAL: MellowSir I can understand not wanting contact with someone, I can't understand it when they've not even viewed your profile, how would they know whether or not they'd be interested unless they did? Maybe they have seen enough of your posts in the forums to know that writing back would be a waste of time. Do you really think all the public whining makes chicks moist with desire? Another example -- cry me river over gals and e-mail That's the problem.. we were all wrong.... there are not a lot of doms/masters on here whining .... it is the same few doms/masters on here posting the same pissy sentiment over & over & over again.

SweetSarijane -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 6:25:14 AM)
beat me to it happypervert lol. To the OP: Obviously you are hung up on not getting replies and getting blocked. This is the internet. No one owes you anything. You really are coming off as whiney in your postings about these issues whether that's your intent or not. Your little snipes in your replies to those who say basically what I'm saying are quite telling and very offputting.

MistressDarling -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 6:25:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: sambamanslilgirl quote: ORIGINAL: MellowSir and you know what, look around and you'll see that women tend to prefer jerks anyway because there are sure a lot with just that. wow - what a blanket assumption And an incorrect one at that! Mellow, Doms like you are the reason we DON'T reply to all emails!

Aileen68 -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 6:25:53 AM)
I think we should all go put the OP on block.

MstrssPassion -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 6:26:35 AM)
[sm=lol.gif]

MellowSir -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 6:26:36 AM)
Dang, sure stirred up a hornet's nest with this post lol

mistoferin -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 6:26:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: happypervert quote: ORIGINAL: MellowSir I can understand not wanting contact with someone, I can't understand it when they've not even viewed your profile, how would they know whether or not they'd be interested unless they did? Maybe they have seen enough of your posts in the forums to know that writing back would be a waste of time. Do you really think all the public whining makes chicks moist with desire? Another example -- cry me river over gals and e-mail Hmmmm.....appears this is a monthly thing for him.....maybe he's got DMS???

mnottertail -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 6:26:49 AM)
and what would your no good reason for that be, then? Bertrand Russell

Aileen68 -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 6:28:15 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail and what would your no good reason for that be, then? Bertrand Russell Because I'm a Betch. And I can. And he's acting all sensitive and girly and that is such a turn off.

MellowSir -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 6:30:14 AM)
Ok ok I give up, you can all stop casting stones now lolol, I'll stop my "whining" and just crawl back under my rock now lol

earthycouple -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 6:30:24 AM)
"No good reason" a very relative term to say the least OP. What you consider a good reason is not what I consider a good reason. Everyone has their own agendas and it seems to me that you are upset because you really liked this profile and are taken aback that she didn't like your email and/or profile for "whatever reason". If she didn't like your picture than that is a good enough reason for her. If she read your email and it had a single typo and she didn't like that, then that is without a doubt good enough reason for her. I think Ron said it best, actually. Maybe she prefers coke. In his very bruntish way...he makes a great point. People do things for what seem the most random reasons to us but to them it makes the most perfect sense. You can not suggest we don't all have an agenda here. One is here for forums only, one is here to troll for willing sex victims, one is here to find the sub or slave that makes life grand, one is here to find the dominant that makes life grand....all agendas. How detailed our agenda is another thing. My agenda includes saying "no thank you" to most. I stress most because when I come across an email that is simply asinine in MY opinion, I delete it with nary a word to the person who sent it. Sometimes, though, when they are so asinine that I can't contain my joy in the laughability of them...I reply. I venture to guess they wish I'd just blocked them when I'm done. The end all be all is....we are all different, our agendas vary, a relative term is just that...relative, our needs vary and no one is going to behave exactly as you do or want until (and this is even a maybe) she wears your collar. CollarMe - A hopeful* place to accidentally come across your "one".*

MasterLordguru -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 6:33:51 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MistressDarling quote: ORIGINAL: sambamanslilgirl quote: ORIGINAL: MellowSirHi and you know what, look around and you'll see that women tend to prefer jerks anyway because there are sure a lot with just that. wow - what a blanket assumption And an incorrect one at that! Mellow, Doms like you are the reason we DON'T reply to all emails! Desperation brings contempt. An assumption such as that only makes real men cringe. I like to think that if someone listened to the Eurythmics "Sweet Dreams" alot can be learned. Some woman want abusers, Some woman want protectors, Others want partners. And same thing with us Men. And MistressDarling, respecting your wishes on your search of your area of NC, and reading your quick block cycl for last 5 post.. you are stunning and good that you caught him in his own deciet. Liars usually trip over their own lies without realizing it. M.L.G

Lordandmaster -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 6:47:49 AM)
That's a lot of wasted seconds when you get 300 messages a day. quote: ORIGINAL: MasterLordguru no thanks..= 3 seconds to type out.. 10 seconds total to type this msg

proudsub -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 6:49:33 AM)
quote: Hell, this person didn't even view my profile. Didin't read the whole thread so this may have already been pointed out, but it only shows as having viewed your profile if they view the entire profile or view it directly from the message boards. She still may have viewed your picture and the profile text.

kittensmailbox -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 6:55:22 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mistoferin If someone blocks you I guess the message that I would take is that they are not interested in having contact with you. Their reasons for such could be one of millions. I certainly wouldn't take offense, assume she is playing a game or even view it as rude. I would simply go on to the next. Why would you see it as a "sore lack of training"? Do you think that all submissives are required to have dialogue with any Dominant who approaches, even when that Dominant does not meet their personal criteria for whatever reason? Very nicely said... i HATE when "doms" say that i am poorly trained just because i speak my mind and do not wish to speak to them...

MstrssPassion -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 7:16:21 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MellowSir Ok ok I give up, you can all stop casting stones now lolol, I'll stop my "whining" and just crawl back under my rock now lol The stones were nothing ... just keep in mind that the next time you come on here pissing & moaning about not getting your way you will most likely be drawn & quartered. (that is if everyone hasn't blocked you already)

Emperor1956 -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 7:34:52 AM)
FR. Damn. My technique is all wrong. I write occasional notes to submissives who I don't already know who catch my eye by, for example, saying something that amuses Me, or who appear to be possibly geographically, relationship-modally (oh, God of English, forgive me for that) and if I can tell at all, emotionally compatible. That's the way I've operated since I joined CM, and all it did was yield me one delightful, deeply loved girl. SHEESH. I obviously should be whining and complaining about all these non-responsive submissives, because THERE'S the action! I'm a believer in anticipatory retaliation, too. I think the next time I see someone who intrigues me, knowing that she'll automatically block me as one of the 300 wankers that contacted her that day, I'LL BLOCK HER FIRST. Yah...that's the ticket. Never let one of "them" get an edge, eh? E.

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

3.515625E-02