RE: Blocked for no good reason? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


kiyari -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 11:15:35 AM)

I block any who send me the identically-worded post more than once.

Smells like SPAM to me [;)]




Sinergy -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 12:33:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

Puella,

I think he meant to make a fake woman's profile to see how many idiotic men send completely moronic messages so they will stop pissy whiny posts about how the chicks here don't dig em.


I was writing a story about 7 years ago and I wanted to research what I was writing.  So I created a profile and found myself shocked and appalled at the sheer number of, emotional-basket-case, or Just-Add-Clue-For-Life sorts of people who wrote that profile emails.  Did give me substantial insight into the world as viewed by female submissives online.

I have apologized before (on here even) for doing so, but writers take tours through other people's lives (Harlan Ellison) and I had a character to develop.

It makes me wonder at a person's self image that other people not responding to their emails would alter their emotional (upset them, anger them, make them all weepy, whatever) state.

Just me, etc.

Sinergy




SimplyMichael -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 12:51:47 PM)

Mod 11,

While I am sure it is against the TOS, there are so many clearly fake profiles clearly nobody is looking or caring.




ModeratorEleven -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 12:56:48 PM)

You're wrong.  They care, they're just swamped.  The more people who use the 'Report Profile' function, the more it helps. 

XI




domiguy -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 1:13:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressDarling


On an average day, I receive 30 messages from Dominants and submissives. If I replied to every single on of them, it would take an hour (assuming your two minute reply theory is accurate). I'm a busy gal. That hour can be put to better use.

Furthermore, If I DO send a "No, thank you" message, nearly half of the time, I get a snarky reply. "Fine then. I didn't want you anyway, fat ass!"



I perved your profile....It would be nice if you mentioned that you have a fat ass..Maybe change your name to Fat AssDarling....I dig a chick with brown hair and brown eyes...But I think that might cut down on all of the responses you have been getting.

I had put up a profile of "brownsugasub69" to respond to a thread touting my position (Domiguy)....Mod11 made me kill her...It was tragic...like losing a left nut....However, in the fifteen minutes of "her" life she received about 30 responses.....Proving that I am hot whether swinging the Domidong or with a tight and sweet, shaven go-go hole.




kiyari -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 1:47:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy
...

I had put up a profile of "brownsugasub69" to respond to a thread touting my position (Domiguy)....Mod11 made me kill her...It was tragic...like losing a left nut....However, in the fifteen minutes of "her" life she received about 30 responses.....Proving that I am hot whether swinging the Domidong or with a tight and sweet, shaven go-go hole.


Ah...

Thanks for the... pervespective [sm=lol.gif]




Aileen68 -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 1:50:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy
I dig a chick with brown hair and brown eyes...


[:)]




KatyLied -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 1:53:11 PM)

I block chicks with brown hair and brown eyes.




Aileen68 -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 1:54:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: KatyLied

I block chicks with brown hair and brown eyes.


[sm=frown.gif]




KatyLied -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 1:58:31 PM)

Gotcha!   [8D]




domiguy -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 2:31:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aileen68

quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy
I dig a chick with brown hair and brown eyes...


[:)]


Oh yes....And somewhat of a nice fragrant vagina....And without dog ears.




Aileen68 -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 2:36:50 PM)

You just may get a tit shot for that.
I




Musicmystery -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 2:43:01 PM)

quote:

I block any who send me the identically-worded post more than once.


Naturally, sending an identically worded post only once would prove difficult...

;-)




Sinergy -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 5:44:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ModeratorEleven

You're wrong.  They care, they're just swamped.  The more people who use the 'Report Profile' function, the more it helps. 

XI


The profile I made up was on a different site.

Sinergy




KatyLied -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 5:48:20 PM)

quote:

And without dog ears.


domigy is
dead.to.me




Absolutemaster -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 5:50:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ModeratorEleven

You're wrong.  They care, they're just swamped.  The more people who use the 'Report Profile' function, the more it helps. 

XI


I reported a profile for mentioning bestiality, and it was pulled.

A few days later a new profile - same photo - also talking about bestiality was posted.  I had to report it four times over the space of a month before it too was pulled.




sambamanslilgirl -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 5:59:56 PM)

amen to that, julia.




kiyari -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 6:18:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

I block any who send me the identically-worded post more than once.


Naturally, sending an identically worded post only once would prove difficult...

;-)


Heh... ya, that did occur to me... [;)]

Maybe something to meditate on... what are those called... koans?

You know, the 'one hand clapping' ... [sm=cool.gif]




robertolapiedra -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/29/2007 10:20:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: livenlearn

~FR~
 
I have only been here a very short time. My first email was from a man who wrote telling me that I needed to find myself a mentor. I wrote back and said that I was not interested in a mentor. He asked why not. I replied that I had a boyfriend and did not need to learn with or from anyone else. He replied that I was a fake and that I did not belong here.
 
My second email: a man writes asking what kind of training I am looking for. I replied that I was not looking for training. He writes back and says then what are you doing here; this site is for the forming of relationships; you don't belong.
 
My third email: a man writes asking me how WE are doing in our search here. I reply back that WE are doing just fine, and thankyou for the kind words of encouragement. He writes back stating that since we are in the same area, we should get together. I reply no thanks. He replies with "fake'
 
I can understand why so many of the woman here block or dont respond to emails. Most of the men are idiots.


Hello livenlearn. Yes they are, but you must admit that this is more than amply compensated by the "genius level" of all the "twenties-ladies" replying (or not) to said "idiots". RL.




Aileen68 -> RE: Blocked for no good reason? (5/30/2007 2:38:38 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: KatyLied

quote:

And without dog ears.


domigy is
dead.to.me



Aha....one of my competition is gone.
One step closer to the domidong.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.320313E-02