MadRabbit
Posts: 3460
Joined: 8/9/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Copulo Mad Rabbit should we accept these dark desires to have sex with small UM’s? quote:
ORIGINAL: Copulo My concern with saying its ok to have fantasies about 6 year olds and everyone saying ‘yes why not, that’s cool’ is that giving the wrong sort a green light for go to certain predators. Should we accept people going out and raping kids? I firmly say "No" as will most people. Should we accept people going out and murdering people? No Should we accept people going out and raping people? No But where do all these forms of play stem from? Rape play...maybe from a fantasy to be raped or to rape. Breath play...maybe from a fantasy to be suffocated or to suffocate Sadism...maybe from a fantasy to make people cry and inflict pain on them Masochism...maybe from a fantasy to be hurt and to suffer... Snuff play...maybe from a fantasy to kill or be killed. People have the fantasies because they have desires. Without desire, there would be no fantasy and without fantasy, people wouldnt want to go out and participating in all the kind of "play". To think that people who are into ethical sadism dont fantasize about hurting people or even...hurting people in a real non consent situation doesnt ring true to me at all. Many sadists I have talked to share these kind of fantasies with me. No more than people who are into rape play dont fantasize about actually being raped. I have sadistic tendacies and I can assure you the fantasy of "Pure Sadism" isnt one that is foreign to me. I cerainly dont fantasize about the "play"...consentual, pre negotiated scenes where women are just pretending to be controlled by me. I fantasize and have desires about actually controlling women. Should we past harsh judgements over these people based on fanatical views of right and wrong and say "Its wrong to have these desires!" when its been widely stated by modern psychiarists that there is no way to change a person's sexual desires? Having desires and fealings dont make a person wrong in my eyes, because both arent subject to rationality. Actions determine whether someone is ethical or unethical. I have times when I feal like walking up to someone and punching them in the face. I have times when someone irritates me so bad I think to myself "Gee, I can just kill that person" and an image of me killing them will flash threw my brain. You cant control how you feal or what you desire, but you can control what you do based on those actions or fealings. Sadists cant stop their fantasies and desires about hurting people and making them cry in the context of "Pure Sadism", but they find a safe and sane outlet for it in the realm of ethical sadism. This is has nothing to do with being cool or "tolerating everyone". Nobody is encouraging that we go out and act our fantasies to the complete fullness and extreme of them. But this idea that we should tell them its not okay to simply have the desires and make them feal guilty for something thats not in the spectrum of human rational is false and not solving anything. All its doing is creating some a lifetime of guilt and anguish over internal wiring they cant change and doing absolutely nothing to stop them from committing the unethical acts. Not accepting or accepting the desire will have zero impact on the desire itself if it cannot be cured by any modern psychiatric means. Finding an outlet for the desire thats ethical so it doesnt lead to unethical behavior is a solution. Putting up a big unwelcome sign to anyone who is into age play simply because it stems from pedophilia and exiling them is only going to make them go out and find an unethical means to satisfy that desire. So...yes....we should accept people who have desires for pedophilia...just as much as we accept people who have desires and fantasies about rape, snuff, suffocation, torture, castration, branding, forced slavery and whatever dark desire the human brain can conjur. But we shouldnt accept people who actaully go out and have sex with children, rape, kill, suffocate, torture, castrate, brand, or force people into slavery. quote:
ORIGINAL: Copulo We reach out to a huge audience of people and not everyone is grounded. Then we should never talk about snuff, rape, suffocation, or sadistic desires as being okay because it might encourage people to do unethical things. As I read your posts, this seems to be more about your personal crusade against pedophilia and not about sexual desires in a logical and scientific way. I am a bit annoyed how it seems you arent even really reading what I am trying to say and trying to brand me as someone in support of fucking children.
< Message edited by MadRabbit -- 6/2/2007 5:18:14 AM >
_____________________________
Advice for New Dominants The Unpolitically Correct Lifestyle Definitions Obama is NOT the Messiah! He's just a VERY NAUGHTY BOY
|