Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Ladies and....ladies?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> RE: Ladies and....ladies? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Ladies and....ladies? - 6/7/2007 7:00:33 PM   
undergroundsea


Posts: 2400
Joined: 6/27/2004
From: Austin, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy
To me, the best affirmative thing a lady can do for a man is boost his confidence when he needs it during the rough seas of life. There's nothing like the partisan support and insightful understanding of a woman gets you and the situation you're dealing with.


This comment seems to carry weight. I am pondering the different scenarios; does the comment apply in the reverse direction, is the I-believe-in-you support more powerful when it comes from the opposite gender?

Thanks for your post.

Cheers,

Sea

< Message edited by undergroundsea -- 6/7/2007 7:04:04 PM >

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Ladies and....ladies? - 6/7/2007 8:08:39 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: undergroundsea

is the I-believe-in-you support more powerful when it comes from the opposite gender?
Sea


Yes, Validation from across the gener line is excellent and exceeds that of the same gender. Why? Because of the work it takes to cross that gender line and the differences that exist across it. Of course Validation from someone you admire is always poignant. If Agassi said positive things about my tennis game, it would trump similar observations from a femdom, but Justin Hennin's remarks might trump his.

As you can see, its all very complicated.

Pollux posted the mathematical calculations of Femdom / Lady "excellences" on our secret board.

(in reply to undergroundsea)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Ladies and....ladies? - 6/8/2007 5:58:14 AM   
undergroundsea


Posts: 2400
Joined: 6/27/2004
From: Austin, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy
Yes, Validation from across the gener line is excellent and exceeds that of the same gender. Why? Because of the work it takes to cross that gender line and the differences that exist across it. Of course Validation from someone you admire is always poignant. If Agassi said positive things about my tennis game, it would trump similar observations from a femdom, but Justin Hennin's remarks might trump his.


Good points. I was considering similar ideas--validation from someone to whom you look up, validation from the other sex, etc.

I am still pondering the why. And I am not sure I understand what you mean when you refer to the work it takes to cross the gender line and the differences that exist across it. Would you please elaborate your thoughts behind that idea?

Perhaps the validation from the other sex can be generalized to validation from a group that has a potential romantic interest or companions. For instance, I am wondering if gay men respond more powerfully to such validation from men or from women? And perhaps validation from this other group is satisfying because it validates one in his/her role to attract one from this group.

Also, I am wondering about patterns of validation sought within the sexes. Do men seek or respond more strongly to validation for traditionally male matters, and women more for traditionally female matters? If so, is this area of validation tied more to societal pressures and expectations, or to areas that heavily affect the esteem and confidence of that individual. I expect it is more the latter which, however, is influenced by the former.

quote:

Pollux posted the mathematical calculations of Femdom / Lady "excellences" on our secret board.


;-)

Awesome! I can't wait to see it!

Cheers,

Sea


< Message edited by undergroundsea -- 6/8/2007 6:40:22 AM >

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Ladies and....ladies? - 6/8/2007 6:39:01 AM   
undergroundsea


Posts: 2400
Joined: 6/27/2004
From: Austin, TX
Status: offline
Here are miscellaneous thoughts from reading various posts on this thread.

It seems the types of behavior we are discussing fall into three broad categories: gestures of good will and kindness towards people in general, gestures of regard in courtship, and gestures of regard in established relationships.

By regard, I mean fondness and general respect and appreciation. While in BDSM a gesture of regard may be driven by dominant and submissive roles, I think gestures of regard commonly occur in vanilla relationships. In these scenarios the gesture of regard is not a subservient gesture but one that conveys fondness and general respect. BDSM relationship can include gestures of regard in a similar spirit.

I think some behaviors that are described as chivalry can be described as rituals that help convey respect and help each person celebrate the roles they associate with their sex. For example, what Slaverosebeauty describes in her post about the car door can be described as such a ritual within and without BDSM. Just as rituals in BDSM help keep alive the D/s dynamic, I think these rituals in a non-D/s context help keep alive the dynamic in relationships or portions of relationships based on non-D/s dynamics.

In courtship, there is likely indeed an imbalance in such gestures. I expect this imbalance is driven by one person wanting to win the attention of the other, which I see to more frequently occur as a man trying to win the attention of a woman.

I think there is an aspect of lady-like or gentlemanly behavior that lies on etiquette--which varies across people, time, and places--and an aspect that relies on values. I think the latter is a stronger candidate to define this behavior.

Two other thoughts come to mind. The first is a recollection of reading about a couple that was having relationship problems. The woman felt her husband did not love him. Her husband did not understand why the wife felt that way. It was because they gave and accepted love in different ways. The second is a related thought about a book of which I have heard that describes five common languages of love: acts of service, gifts, verbal affirmation, physical affirmation, and spending quality time.

I think how one conveys affection is relevant to a discussion of gestures of regard.

Cheers,

Sea

< Message edited by undergroundsea -- 6/8/2007 7:23:16 AM >

(in reply to undergroundsea)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Ladies and....ladies? - 6/8/2007 3:02:45 PM   
pixelslave


Posts: 1444
Joined: 8/19/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: undergroundsea
The second is a related thought about a book of which I have heard that describes five common languages of love: acts of service, gifts, verbal affirmation, physical affirmation, and spending quality time.


Sea,
The book I think you're likely referring to was originally called "The Five Love Languages" which was so successful there are now many variations on the theme written for specific groups and situations such as mates, children, etc.
 
 - pixel

_____________________________

Chivalry isn't dead! It's for those who have it in their hearts & are willing to be taught. It's a way of life, a code of honor; this one's armor still needs some polishing!

(in reply to undergroundsea)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Ladies and....ladies? - 6/8/2007 3:13:33 PM   
undergroundsea


Posts: 2400
Joined: 6/27/2004
From: Austin, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pixelslave
The book I think you're likely referring to was originally called "The Five Love Languages" which was so successful there are now many variations on the theme written for specific groups and situations such as mates, children, etc.


Ah. Thanks for the title. Any chance they are going to do one for dommes and subs? ;-)

Cheers,

Sea

(in reply to pixelslave)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Ladies and....ladies? - 6/8/2007 3:22:37 PM   
pixelslave


Posts: 1444
Joined: 8/19/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: undergroundsea
I am still pondering the why. And I am not sure I understand what you mean when you refer to the work it takes to cross the gender line and the differences that exist across it. Would you please elaborate your thoughts behind that idea?


I also do not understand this reference to the work it takes to cross the gender lines either.  In fact, I probably have more female friends than I have male friends at this time.  I find them easier to talk to for a number of reasons regardless of any romantic involvement that may or may not have existed at any point in our friendship.  My male ego is less involved in the interactions and any fears of judgement I may have (more because of my unmentionables) as being the male submissive I am are lessened when talking with a woman compared to when talking with a vanilla man who might be a neighbor, co-worker, etc. 
 
It seems that when talking with a man, there is perhaps something of a sense of competition that also often becomes involved on either his part or mine.  I've also experienced a sense of shaming for who and what I am because of not fitting his idea of "the norm" that can occur as well.  This tends to cause me to withdraw and be less outspoken on personal issues when around other men unless I know them well or know that they are in the lifestyle.  So the context of the male, who they are, and how much we share in common is much more important when it comes to communicating with them than it is when it comes to most women I've know or have chosen as friends.
 
 
quote:


Perhaps the validation from the other sex can be generalized to validation from a group that has a potential romantic interest or companions. For instance, I am wondering if gay men respond more powerfully to such validation from men or from women? And perhaps validation from this other group is satisfying because it validates one in his/her role to attract one from this group.


Your question regarding gay men would be a very interesting one to know the answer to, perhaps shedding a lot of light on this particular issue.


quote:


Also, I am wondering about patterns of validation sought within the sexes. Do men seek or respond more strongly to validation for traditionally male matters, and women more for traditionally female matters? If so, is this area of validation tied more to societal pressures and expectations, or to areas that heavily affect the esteem and confidence of that individual. I expect it is more the latter which, however, is influenced by the former.


I think when it comes to occupations or areas where one is being mentored by someone of the same sex, this is more likely to be the case.  At least that has been my experience.  To be recognized or validated by one's peers is certainly very satisfying.
 
 - pixel

< Message edited by pixelslave -- 6/8/2007 3:25:18 PM >


_____________________________

Chivalry isn't dead! It's for those who have it in their hearts & are willing to be taught. It's a way of life, a code of honor; this one's armor still needs some polishing!

(in reply to undergroundsea)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Ladies and....ladies? - 6/8/2007 9:34:10 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline

She's kind of the lesbian, femdom equivalent of George Jefferson or Archie Bunker here on the MB.

(in reply to undergroundsea)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Ladies and....ladies? - 6/8/2007 9:34:29 PM   
undergroundsea


Posts: 2400
Joined: 6/27/2004
From: Austin, TX
Status: offline
From a discussion on another thread:

quote:

ORIGINAL: undergroundsea
quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy
It makes you feel like its boys against the girls all over again.


On this thread, not as much. At least it is not how we came to this point. On this thread, it's about rudeness and attacks on others, which is what I questioned.

Instead of responding about the rudeness, she is going towards a discussion that really belongs on another thread. I expect she is doing so because she has no response about the rudeness and needs another direction to deflect the conversation.

As for the other thread, perhaps it has potential to become a boys versus girls matter for some people. The thread stemmed from intellectual curiousity. Rather than discuss here her response and ask questions to you, I will instead direct the questions to her in that thread: http://www.collarchat.com/m_1064592/mpage_2/key_/tm.htm

Cheers,

Sea


Pardon me for not responding in more detail to this post the first time.

quote:

ORIGINAL: GuidingLite

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<arg>>>>>>>>>>> whats with these wuss weak baby questions. 'Ohhhhhh come come the girls dont have to do nice gestures to us boys and show us nice regards tooooo' <waaaaaaaa>
<sigh>

quit being all scarred your never gonna have the power like Her.

women dont have to do these quote: [regard gestures] you worry and speak about and check this BECOZ they dont have to. thats why. womens got what the man wants. yay thats right and quit all fighting it and dont hollar bout it. you think its so unfair and you cry about it and stomp your feet like a passiveagressive fake ass sub. whatever. just come out your closet already that your like really just a lost dom in disguise, dammit. your in a womens world. cry in the sub section and quits trying to fool these WOmens that your a sub when you aint one and aint neva going to be one till you accept it. whats it. you know.


Let's break this down. There are two points your text attempts to convey.

First, you think the reason that women don't extend gestures of regard is because they don't have to. Sure, I agree that that point is relevant and is one I raise in post number 17 in this thread. While your point has some merit or relevance, I think it is too simplistic to reduce it to that alone. I think the matter is more complex and relies on multiple factors, of which the point you raise is one.

The second point you raise is that if one expects regard, one cannot be a sub.

First, if you follow the posts, you will see this thread is not a rant but an intellectual discussion. Asking the question in itself is not necessarily equivalent to expecting or wanting to receive regard. But in my case I do indeed expect regard.

I do expect respect in my social relationships--friendships, work relationships, more--in general. And I, in turn, give respect. I give each person basic respect initially. From that point onwards, the respect I give is influenced by the behavior of the person as well as what is given to me in return. I extend this expectation to most Fm relationships.

I say most because I can see myself engaging in a relationship which is limited to SM or D/s play only, where I can process the relationship differently and not expect what I ordinarily do. However, I would see this relationship to be incomplete and would give to it proportionately.

I would not enter into a broader relationship that did not make me comfortable about basic respect. With that prerequisite in place, I can see myself being flexible on matters by realigning a perspective to see something as a gesture of D/s versus a matter of respect. I have whatever sense of self I have. I may take a lesser role but do not consider myself a lesser person for having submissive interests. Whatever realigning I do will be because of how I feel about the person and what is created in the relationship, and not because a sense of duty that a true sub is supposed to behave per a certain rule book.

My broader relationship will be based on D/s and romantic love. And for this relationship to be healthy, affection has to flow in both directions. I would indeed be unsatisfied if affection was not reciprocated. In general, I think both people need to give to a relationship for it to succeed.

I think it is fair of me to expect respect and affection from my relationship. I disagree with your notion that if a sub expects respect and affection, he is not a sub. It is not clear to me on what you base this notion. Are you able to explain it?

I sense anger and sarcasm in your post. Why is it there? Perhaps some of it comes because I have called you on your attacks on people on multiple occasions. However, I think there is more because I have seen statements in similar spirit directed at other people. Why are you threatened if a sub expects respect or regard? What are your thoughts about your capacity and interest to give to a relationship or to a sub?

Cheers,

Sea

(in reply to GuidingLite)
Profile   Post #: 49
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> RE: Ladies and....ladies? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063