NeedToUseYou
Posts: 2297
Joined: 12/24/2005 From: None of your business Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyEllen Please dont think you need to defend yourself NeedTo UseYou - I appreciate your honesty. When this subject comes up, we get so many posts claiming its not a problem, but as most of us experience, it patently is a problem. When my ex and I split, it was upsetting, I found it difficult to deal with. But looking at it from the other way around, would I have stayed with her, if she had announced her need to transition to male? I honestly dont think I would have - and thats even had I transitioned to female at the same time. I just wouldnt have been able to deal with it and she would not be the same person anymore. And then I come to the crux of all this, which is, that in my opinion and experience, social acceptance when one is TS relies heavily on one's ability to pass successfully as the target sex. If one doesnt look right, then one's chances of being accepted by others, including family, is very low. One's degree of acceptance as female in terms of adult relationships (including bdsm, Mod 11!) surely then also relies on this factor - although it yet remains that however well one passes, one's chances are low. If this were not so, then it would not be the case that there are so many TS people who live alone or who partner with others in the same position. It is a very lucky TS person who manages to partner outside of these parameters, and a very unusual and special person who partners with them. But the problem with this is, that an ability to pass or not is no measure of the level of distress a TS person feels and the degree of need to transition that they have. Equally such a measure has no relation to the sort of person they are - which gives the lie to the whole "personality is important, not looks" guff that we often read here when it comes to "fat threads" and the like. E I agree most of it is bullshit IMO. While I would go for someone that is not "perfect" obviously, Probably a good 1/3 off the top of the women in my age range are gone by looks. Another 1/2 are gone because of intelligence, and or philosophical differences. Leaving about 20% left of the available women, which at my age 30, reduces that figure further. And from those 20% only those that find me attractive enough in the areas they care most about would work. So my guesstimation is even being non-TS, only about 5% of the female available population would work for a long term relationship. Screwing them well that number would jump up to looks only which is much better odds, but I'm not really interested in that anymore, as a sole goal. If you cut all the bullshit out, it's about looks, it's about personality, it's about philosophy, it's about intelligence,. If any of those qualities is lacking severely then it doesn't work. This is not to say there is only one standard for all those qualities but everyone has these standards. There are plenty of hot Dommes for example on this site, but I have to exclude all of them because of personality differences. There are some cute women that just don't have compatible moral behaviour. Then there are women that have good personalities and moral behaviour, but I don't find attractive. And the flip side of this is that the same thing applies in my direction to. I don't think it's bad, attraction itself is a biased thing based on illogical reasoning. It is there though. You for example could get someone I have no doubt, but I'm sure you exclude people that don't fit as well. Honestly, I'm sure you couldn't be with someone that was immoral, or someone that wieghed 700 lbs, or someone that is completely uneducated. I bet the standards are higher than that but the point is we all have standards. And it seems that we all like to get down on people when there standards exclude us from being a potential mate. Even if we don't want to be with them either. Now for friends I don't see the logic in excluding based on looks, it makes no sense to me in that context.
|