CuriousLord
Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady This has absolutely NOTHING to do with estrogen and it is immature and childish to even make such a statement. Jokes.. humor. Based off social sterotypes taken to the point that they're silly? (i.e., "an athiest, a priest, and a jew walk into a bar..", "three blondes are..", "a blond, a redhead, a brunette", "an American, an Englishman, and a German..", etc.) Estrogen-based actions vs. testerone-based actions..? A lot posts before have sterotyped things as "testerone[-driven]"; I thought it was funny, so I flipped it around. If you took such offense to such a jest, perhaps you should reevaulate how easily you might be offended? I feel that this may even apply to your current "situation". quote:
ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady The fact is that it WAS discussed with him, this had nothing to do with his wanting to better understand me at all. So what you're saying is.. he asked, completely disconcerned with the actual answer to the question, just trying to control you in forcing you to answer the question? quote:
ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady It had everything to do with his taking a position that he does not yet have, and assuming rights he has not yet been given. So you don't think it was jealousy, or concern about the nature of who he was going to commit to.. just.. and nothing but.. trying to dominante you against your will..? quote:
ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady Not everyone believes that simply because you are a sub you are required to answer any and all requests or questions from someone who says they are a dominant prior to any agreements being made. Suppose not. Then again, this is a simple question.. something he wanted to know, and asked. Apparently, it was important to him? Or, maybe, he was interested and didn't realize your distress? In any case, are you truly aiming to build a relationship in which being able to get a truthful answer on a question is based off his dominance, and forthcomingness? quote:
ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady The fact that a great majority of support that I have received has come from Masters and Dominants serves as a great indicator (to me) that while you may apologize for "being blunt", you are obviously in the minority of people who would believe that a dom/master has entitlements to things simply because they identify with that position. I can assure you, my belief in being open and honest with your partner and talking things out is not based in D/s. I can also assure you that keeping things to yourself and talking to other people about your problems, should you get responses like, as you put it, "great majority of" people have given, then drama will ensue, should anything continue. quote:
ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady His decision to continue to IM is what was so rude. So then he's not a priority; at least, not one that compares to your phone conversation enough to answer his concerns..? I can see this going too far. I can see him pushing you for a while, demanding you get off the phone and have a conversation that instant after you answer his quick inquaries. I can see an insecure, hollering fellow whining that time should stop for him. But was this the case? Or did he ask you to hold on a moment? Relationships do involve compromise to work on things, you know. Sometimes, compromise means taking a moment out to talk to a distressed or concerned parner. Now, orginially, you said he IM'd you, and sent some more while you were on the phone. I know a lot of people who talk on the phone and IM at the same time. I'm one of them. Being younger and used to both, so are almost all of my friends and college buddies. This is normal to us- not rude. So perhaps I'm failing to empathize. Could you explain to me how IMing you while on the phone was rude? quote:
ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady He and I have had several conversation regarding issues such as this. His "excuse of saying "I'm a dom" as a reason for his behavior when I told him that he was doing something that made me uncomfortable was the big red flag. I do believe the "I'm a dom" statement is more adequeate than often considered. Unless being a dominant is an act, doesn't dominance tend to show through? Not to say a dominant person might not retrain his personality for the sake of interacting peacefully, but does a dominant individual not seek control? But this is a side bit. Does a person need to be dominant to want the truth from their partner? Do not fail him for simply being unable to be aware of his own emotions and sentiments, or unable to articulate them, unless it is for by virtue of such. This is to say: what he wants may be something unrelated to D/s, or/and he may be unable to tell what he wants; still, do not hold him responsble for what he's unable to articulate, though you may hold him responsible for not being able to articulate. quote:
ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady I don't accept such answers. Had he continued with, "but I'm sorry it made you uncomfortable" or something similar, that would have been different. So are you more concerned with his actions, or the feeling that he didn't take you into consideration? quote:
ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady While it may well have been the "green-eyed monster" causing his behavior, when I pointed it out to him, the "green-eyed monster" doesn't justify the behavior. But what if something else does?
|