Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Ron Paul on "The Colbert Report"


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Ron Paul on "The Colbert Report" Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Ron Paul on "The Colbert Report" - 6/15/2007 8:37:19 AM   
philosophy


Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: selfbnd411

I'm not concerned about what happens to rebels.  They reaped what they sowed.



........i don't know a vast amount about Waco, but weren't there children involved? If so, can you really say that they made an informed choice?

(in reply to selfbnd411)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Ron Paul on "The Colbert Report" - 6/15/2007 10:17:37 AM   
Alumbrado


Posts: 5560
Status: offline
quote:

I would be curious if you could point out where the words Social Security was ever used at all.

Same for Student Aid ... I must have missed it.

Medicare was mentioned, but only for Dr. Paul to indicate that he didn't accept it as a Physician. He discussed a transition period, etc ...

If you really know the message, and are not just spreading mistruths, as you are here ... you would know the point is to legalize competition, get rid of excess regulation (for example, why do we have a Department of Education, when the States have their own). and to move more power to local governments, as provided in the Constitution.

I'm glad you aren't one of my profs.


ROTFLMAO!!!

(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Ron Paul on "The Colbert Report" - 6/15/2007 1:40:07 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveluci
quote:

The Davidians set the fires and killed themselves

It's not like they had a lot of options left at that point.  Regardless of how the fire started, they were backed into such a corner that it was either that or be shot to death by govt. agents.  Guess they just chose to take control of the means of their deaths rather than be gunned down.  The bottom line, for me, is that they shouldn't have been in a situation where they had to choose which way would be preferable to die.  It should have never gotten to the point it did.  Since you watched the video, you are obviously aware that the government had every opportunity to get to Koresh in a way that would not have led to the stand-off.  They chose, instead, to go in guns blazing trying to get some glory.  They created the mess they got involved in as surely (more so actually) than Koresh.  They just didn't expect to get back as much as they gave.  The deaths on all sides were sad and unnecessary but I maintain that the government was as least as much, if not moreso, responsible than Koresh or any of his group.  Thanks for the information on that report..........slave luci

A few more myths to bust and then you guys can go back to discussing the libertarian in GOP clothing's chances of getting elected.

The Special Councils report also makes clear that during the events of the last day while inserting CS gas into the buildings and afterwords the federal and state forces were not firing on the Davidians. The CEV's they were using were modified M60 tanks and were inpenetrable to the Barret .50 rifles and lighter weapons the Davidians were using. The Davidians who fled the compound mostly fled before the fires started and some reported escaping to avoid being killed by the true believers who did start the fires. Furthermore none of the Davidians who died on the day of the fire showed any evidence that their fresh gunshot wounds were the result of high velocity rounds of the sort used in the assault and sniper rifles in use by the feds.

If you check the civil trial transcripts you'll find that several of the survivors who sued claiming that the feds started the fires admitted in questioning by the feds on the day of the fires that they fled when they saw Koresh's henchmen preparing to start the fires. It was one of many factors that caused the court to throw out the civil suits.

So it is not unreasonable for the feds to indicate by some visual signal that the fightinbg had ceased so as to encourage those Davidians, who may have been armed, out in the brush to come in and surrender before sending agents out to find them.

As to why the ATF raided rather than simply arresting Koresh while he was out jogging. I have no idea but there is a plethora of good reasons. Snatching Koresh doesn't get the illegal weapons out of the compound. It does not result in the removal of Koresh's "brides" or the other children in the compound. It should be remembered that the raid was moved up a day because the local paper chose to start running an expose on Koresh and the Davidians abuse of children. So getting the children out of the Davidians control was likely a major factor in planning the raid.

That the ATF did an absolutely awful job of inserting undercover agents to observe the compound from across the street and that their opsec was so bad that a Davidian sympathizer leaked the fact the raid was about to happen to Koresh is inexcusable but it still doesn't show me smething President Clinton was at fault for in Waco which afterall is what this series of posts ultimately was about.

(in reply to slaveluci)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Ron Paul on "The Colbert Report" - 6/15/2007 2:15:13 PM   
slaveluci


Posts: 4294
Joined: 3/2/2007
From: Little Rock, AR
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
A few more myths to bust and then you guys can go back to discussing the libertarian in GOP clothing's chances of getting elected

Well, as that IS the topic of this thread I started, perhaps we should.  I appreciate you busting all these myths, as you say, but everything I have said is not a "myth."  It's obvious you take no issue with the raid and you appear to feel the Davidians got what they deserved.  That's fine but I disagree.  The exact chain of events isn't as important to me as the fact that all these guns, tanks, and canisters of gas should never have been there in the first place.  Exactly what followed what is kind of beside the point.  None of the deadly events could have happened if the botched raid hadn't been conducted in the first place.  Koresh and the Davidians certainly don't share the blame for that decision. 

quote:

As to why the ATF raided rather than simply arresting Koresh while he was out jogging. I have no idea but there is a plethora of good reasons.

Again, that is debatable.  I've yet to hear any I considered "good."

quote:

 It does not result in the removal of Koresh's "brides" or the other children in the compound

If the government is so concerned about child brides, I wonder why they haven't conducted a huge, deadly raid on the Mormon sects who blatantly marry them as we speak.  Also, if they were so concerned about the children, they surely wouldn't have started or continued the raid as the did at Mt. Carmel.  Their presence there was a likely excuse to do what they did.

quote:

That the ATF did an absolutely awful job of inserting undercover agents to observe the compound from across the street and that their opsec was so bad that a Davidian sympathizer leaked the fact the raid was about to happen to Koresh is inexcusable

As well as most of the rest of their actions. 

quote:

but it still doesn't show me smething President Clinton was at fault for in Waco which afterall is what this series of posts ultimately was about

Perhaps, but that is not something that I personally alleged so I won't speak on it.  Again, thanks for the earlier info and for the civil debate.  We obviously disagree but you have your facts straight even if you are wrong...kidding, of course......luci

_____________________________

To choose a good book, look in an inquisitor’s prohibited list. ~John Aikin

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Ron Paul on "The Colbert Report" - 6/15/2007 7:10:10 PM   
Griswold


Posts: 2739
Joined: 2/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cyberdude611
Right or not...Ron Paul made a critical error in the first debate by claiming America shared responsibility for 9/11. That is just not a Republican belief. Not only that, but that idea is very, very unpopular in the GOP... It is so unpopular that if you suggest it, you risk being viewed as un-American. 
And analysts on both sides of the political spectrum has said Ron Paul's campaign ended with that one sentence.

Again, truth or not isn't the issue. It's about politics. We have two very polarized sides in the American electorate. And Ron Paul doesn't fit in either of them. Only a little over 100 million people vote in the US. About 45% will always vote for the GOP... 45% will vote for the Democrats. 5% will split to one side or the other depending on which way the wind is blowing. That leaves only 5% of the electorate for people like Ron Paul.


Well said.

This is an argument ("argument:  A debate among well founded thought") that has its curriculum surrounded by TV.

Ron Paul didn't make a critical error in accusing the American public as to sharing responsability with Al Queda...he suggested quite clearly that our politicians have laid the foundation for our current condition.

It envelopes not only our (world) oil policies (as in funding rogue nations who are most clearly against every policy we believe in...or should), it includes places where we believe in certain things that the folks we fund don't....and it includes your (and my) less than vigorous involvement.

We get the government we ascribe to.

Ron Paul only said the obvious...we're getting what we ascribed to.

Guilliani only turned it (rather effectively) into a sound bite.

It doesn't change the truth of what the man said.


(in reply to cyberdude611)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Ron Paul on "The Colbert Report" - 6/15/2007 9:51:09 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveluci

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
A few more myths to bust and then you guys can go back to discussing the libertarian in GOP clothing's chances of getting elected

Well, as that IS the topic of this thread I started, perhaps we should.  I appreciate you busting all these myths, as you say, but everything I have said is not a "myth."  It's obvious you take no issue with the raid and you appear to feel the Davidians got what they deserved.  That's fine but I disagree.  The exact chain of events isn't as important to me as the fact that all these guns, tanks, and canisters of gas should never have been there in the first place.  Exactly what followed what is kind of beside the point.  None of the deadly events could have happened if the botched raid hadn't been conducted in the first place.  Koresh and the Davidians certainly don't share the blame for that decision. 

Let me make somethings clear. First and most importantly I don't think 'they got what they deserved.' No one deserves to die in a fire or by having a loved one shoot them or stab them.

However the government simply cannot allow seperatist groups of any stripe to blatantly break laws of the sort the Davidians were accused of breaking. It endangers others far too much. If the Davidians had remained a peaceful breakaway group of Seventh Day Adventists I am quite willing to bet the Mt. Carmel complex would still be there today. When Koresh took over and started having the Davidians stockpile arms and convery weapons to fire full automatic they crossed a line that many other groups have crossed with all too often tragic results. Once the child bride and other abuse charges became public, in the Waco paper the very day of the raid, it is reasonable to assume Texas's child welfare agency was going to get involved. What would the Davidians have done when the vans rolled up to gather evidence, interview the children and quite likely take the kids into protective custody? Would we now be blaming the ATF for allowing the executions of those Texas state employees?

As to your questioning of the feds concerns for child brides in mormon sects, it ill hopefully please you that Warren Jeffs is in federal custody and the FLDS, the infamous mormon polygamist sect whose communities straddle the Utah/Arizona border, that he controlled seems to be collapsing. The Utah state government has seized control of all the homes and businesses in these towns by taking over a charity that the church used to own all the property so as to evade taxes on it.

The dozens of young men thrown out of the group in order to maintain the imbalance of women needed to allow widespread polygamy are making headway in being reintegrated with their families and community.

Its not all rosy but as someone who has tracked these groups for many years it is hopeful.

(in reply to slaveluci)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Ron Paul on "The Colbert Report" - 6/16/2007 5:34:04 AM   
Manawyddan


Posts: 701
Joined: 1/2/2005
From: Petaluma (Northern California)
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cyberdude611
No...that is what he said. I heard him say it. He said the reason they attacked us is becuase we are over there. In other words it is our actions that lead to the attack. And he referred to this as blowback.


bin Laden said he attacked us because we are over there. The 9/11 Commission said he attacked us because we are over there.

'blowback' is a standard intelligence community term. it means: 'negative outcome to a company policy which we didn't expect,' basically.

Or are claiming 9/11 happened because 'they hate us for our freedoms'?

_____________________________

_______________________________________________
"She always had a terrific sense of humor"
(Valerie Solonas, as described by her mother)
_______________________________________________

(in reply to cyberdude611)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Ron Paul on "The Colbert Report" - 6/16/2007 6:21:37 AM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Manawyddan

quote:

ORIGINAL: cyberdude611
No...that is what he said. I heard him say it. He said the reason they attacked us is becuase we are over there. In other words it is our actions that lead to the attack. And he referred to this as blowback.


bin Laden said he attacked us because we are over there. The 9/11 Commission said he attacked us because we are over there.

'blowback' is a standard intelligence community term. it means: 'negative outcome to a company policy which we didn't expect,' basically.

Or are claiming 9/11 happened because 'they hate us for our freedoms'?


Yeah, what's with Guliani and, "they hate us for our freedoms".
I mean where did he get that? That doesn't make any sense.
Bin Laden (Did) say the reason for 9/11 was that the U.S. had Troops in Saudi Arabia "the holiest of muslim countries."
And the 9/11 Commission (Did) say the same thing so Guliani is full of shit!
I mean can you see a couple of those al qeada camel jockeys sitting around a campfire talking; "Achmed, I'm jealous of the Americans because they drive Cadillacs, Lincolns and Corvettes."
"Correct Muhammed, we would never be allowed the freedom to drive such nice vehicles here in Crapistan!"
"I'm very jealous of the Americans for having that freedom, we must attack!"

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to Manawyddan)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Ron Paul on "The Colbert Report" - 6/16/2007 6:39:22 AM   
slaveluci


Posts: 4294
Joined: 3/2/2007
From: Little Rock, AR
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
Let me make somethings clear. First and most importantly I don't think 'they got what they deserved.' No one deserves to die in a fire or by having a loved one shoot them or stab them

Agreed....or by having a government agent shoot them either.

quote:

However the government simply cannot allow seperatist groups of any stripe to blatantly break laws of the sort the Davidians were accused of breaking. It endangers others far too much. If the Davidians had remained a peaceful breakaway group of Seventh Day Adventists I am quite willing to bet the Mt. Carmel complex would still be there today. When Koresh took over and started having the Davidians stockpile arms and convery weapons to fire full automatic they crossed a line that many other groups have crossed with all too often tragic results. Once the child bride and other abuse charges became public, in the Waco paper the very day of the raid, it is reasonable to assume Texas's child welfare agency was going to get involved. What would the Davidians have done when the vans rolled up to gather evidence, interview the children and quite likely take the kids into protective custody? Would we now be blaming the ATF for allowing the executions of those Texas state employees?

Valid points.  It is indeed hard to imagine what would have happened had the massacre not gone down like it did.  We can only imagine since we'll never know.

quote:

As to your questioning of the feds concerns for child brides in mormon sects, it ill hopefully please you that Warren Jeffs is in federal custody and the FLDS, the infamous mormon polygamist sect whose communities straddle the Utah/Arizona border, that he controlled seems to be collapsing. The Utah state government has seized control of all the homes and businesses in these towns by taking over a charity that the church used to own all the property so as to evade taxes on it.

Just because I didn't know about that one report you told me about doesn't mean I'm not aware of any newsworthy events.  I'm well aware of what has happened with Warren Jeffs - finally.  Glad they finally got around to looking into that whole thing and as an added benefit the government gets to have all the homes and businesses to boot. 

quote:

The dozens of young men thrown out of the group in order to maintain the imbalance of women needed to allow widespread polygamy are making headway in being reintegrated with their families and community.

Yes, I've read about that and it's great to know that's happening.  It is indeed hopeful, as you say. 

Just a thought:  I've always found it ironic and sad that many of these sects are founded with what I consider good ideas in mind.  They are founded by people who are disillusioned by or tired of conventional society or religion and just want to get off with those of like mind and live their own way.  I'm all about that.  They usually go into it with the nagging belief that the government or "powers that be" are "out to get" them.  That may or may not be true, depending on the group.  However, as time goes by, these same "leaders" begin to act in ways that will insure that the government trains their scope on them (figuratively and literally).  It's a self-fulfilling prophecy because eventually the government is after them and usually does wind up murdering some of them, destroying their homestead, etc.  I just find it tragic that some of these people (Jim Jones, David Koresh, etc.) start out with what I consider idealistic plans.  Eventually, their power and paranoia end up causing immoral and/or criminal behavior and then the very "enemies" they fear are sure to notice and "come after" them just as they always feared.  Seems like anyone charismatic enough to gain a following and attempt their own Utopian version of society also always happens to be just disturbed enough to let that power corrupt them and have it inevitably lead to tragedies such as those at Jonestown and Waco.  To me, it's sad all the way around..........slave luci


_____________________________

To choose a good book, look in an inquisitor’s prohibited list. ~John Aikin

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Ron Paul on "The Colbert Report" - 6/17/2007 12:27:20 AM   
UtopianRanger


Posts: 3251
Status: offline
quote:

Yeah, what's with Guliani and, "they hate us for our freedoms".


My friend......


That is the most reprehensible, vile bit of trickery /propaganda I've seen used by anyone/anywhere on the American people is the last ten years. It's so fucking illogical -- in any context -- that you rarely hear it mouthed by Bush or Shotgun anymore.

I would say that after what we've seen transpire over the last seven years.....anyone who still falls for that, is perhaps a bigger dork than the lame-asses who are still sending money to Nigeria

And Caitlyn..... I think we should all get together and nominate you for the title of ''Honorary Professor'' 







- R



_____________________________

"If you are going to win any battle, you have to do one thing. You have to make the mind run the body. Never let the body tell the mind what to do... the body is never tired if the mind is not tired."

-General George S. Patton


(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 90
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Ron Paul on "The Colbert Report" Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078