velvetears -> RE: When is enough, enough…..or where does acceptance end? (6/20/2007 6:30:08 AM)
|
FR domiguy, if i saw someting constructive in what you say perhaps i would take you more seriously, but all you do is use your humor as a veil to put others down. You make assumptions about me being pissed - sorry to dash your hopes but i have not been pissed throughout this thread, maybe a tad disappointed at how some people chose to handle their "confusion". You asked for clarification on a post i made and i was polite enough to respond to you nicely. i clarified some things for dark as well when she misunderstood based on a word - although really it didn't much affect the content of the post much, but i gave her the benefit of the doubt and agreed the better word would have been bbq. i didn't give my specifc example for debate, i gave it to assit the op as people were asking her for examples. i thought of one, did you even try to put it in context to the original op angelic made, no, you never had any intention of doing so. You don't like what she has to say and you don't agree with her, so your little clown act starts up. You don't open people up to dialogue and discussion with veiled insults and passive agresive humor, i don't care one way or another how you post, or why you post, i don't have to push any button to ignore you but i certainly don't have to like or agree with your methods. dark, maybe you need more sleep or something because i have never seen you so confused by a thread as much as this one. Sorry if i don't quite buy it. Maybe you're just not reading carefuly because it was made clear fairly early on this was about prop. i called domi a clown and it wasn't said in an underhanded way - i out and out said - "you are like the class clown." You call that mud slinging but he can call angelic "not intelligent" and me a "ranter" but i suppose because his humor tickles your funny bone, or he's a "friend" thats ok, i suppose that's to be expected, we are as you say in a school yard and that is how children think. i also suggest you start following your own sage advice - if you don't like people responding, don't post. i suppose calling angelics remarks "stupid" isn't a part of your mud slinging accusation now is it... or is the slinging only ok if it flies one way? Oh and btw it's not "mentally incapable" it's "mentally incompetant", important difference, you wouldn't want to mislead anyone or add to this "confusion" Angelic's post, if you care to really try to understand her isn't just about prop, there was an issue she wanted to discuss and since it seemed to offend people the attack, confusion, nit picking, mud slinging as you termed it started. If people want to announce they are blocking who are you to tell them how they should do it, by not announcing it, they have every right in the world to tell the person who offends them they are blocking them and if that bothers you - take a chill pill.
|
|
|
|