Focus50
Posts: 3962
Joined: 12/28/2004 From: Newcastle, Australia Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MadRabbit quote:
ORIGINAL: julietsierra quote:
ORIGINAL: MadRabbit quote:
ORIGINAL: ned5435 I hooked up with a slave looking for 24/7 master, with understanding that I was married and temporary. Now I am hooked on her. Do not want to lose her, dont wish to lose/hurt wife. Wouldnt mind if she found master that would share and lived close. Damned if I do , damned if I dont. Well...once again...in the close minded ignorance that can often be Collarme.com...the general public has somehow managed to conclude from these 4-5 sentences of information that... The man is cheating on his wife. That somwhow he is in the idiot for entering the relationship and not the slave DESPITE the fact that it says there was an understanding that he was married and temporary. That clearly its not possible its the slave fault for entering a relationship that wasnt ultimately what she wanted. That once again he is an idiot for developing an emotional connection with someone...as if somehow we can control who we develop these connections with. Perhaps maybe his wife is quite aware of the relationship, but the fear of loss/hurt is coming from realization that he fell in love with the woman? Perhaps both the slave and the Master entered into a relationship in a mature way, even though if it didnt meet their full expectations, and things just developed differently then they wanted? The real fools here are all the people making asasine assumptions from this limited information. I wonder how many posters here have fallen for someone who wasnt exactly the best match for them. To steal Stephann's Nietzsche quote, "There is madness in love, but some reason in madness." Well, I kinda hoped I made it clear that the initial decision was both of their faults. However, he was asking what HE should do and that's what I answered to. I don't know... maybe it read wrong. Ultimately, SOMEONE is going to have to make a decision - either she can decide to stay under the circumstances they have or leave. Either he can decide to keep her and deal with the attending consequences or let her go. Either way, the decision is difficult. Oh, and I don't think he's a cheating rat. Nor do I think she's a fool. I just think they have a difficult situation they need to figure out. And waiting/hoping for a dominant to come along that will want her (not that she's unwantable, just that finding the "right" person is difficult at best) AND be able to accept the fact that he'd have to share is not exactly something that is going to happen over night - if indeed at all. Just for clarification...I thought your post was awesome. I was talking about all the posts before that. Crikey MadRabbit, seems like you're in full "meltdown mode" of late.... Anyhoo, as one of those "before" posters you refer to, seems you have an issue with whether or not the OP actually cheated on his wife, given that that was the gist of my particular post? So what do you need NOT to conclude the obvious - a "smoking gun", witnesses, polaroids, a one-armed man fleeing the scene...? Is it only cheating if he actually stuck his dick in this slave - of which I grant there is no hard information in the OP? Perhaps the OP's guilt and fear of losing or hurting his wife, which he *DID* express, is because he had coffee with this slave, for eg - izzat it? Musta been great coffee, given that the OP is now "hooked", ay? And that he's "damned" if he does or doesn't go back for more.... Thing is, this is not a court of law where commonsense, life experience and street nous is stifled by a lack of hard evidence and "reasonable doubt" etc. As far as I'm concerned, on a public board something that looks, walks and quacks like a duck is a *duck*. To that end, the OP's guilt is primarily because he cheated on his wife - quack, quack, slam dunk, quack! Focus.
|