LadyEllen
Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006 From: Stourport-England Status: offline
|
A press release from a hitherto unknown neo-nazi group was delivered simultaneously this morning to the British Home Office, Scotland Yard and the headquarters of the Muslim Parliament of Great Britain, warning that it planned reprisals directly targeting Muslims should terrorist attacks continue. The release, said to have been issued by a group calling itself GB88, mentioned specific threats against Mosques in all parts of Britain, and vowed to “level” undisclosed targets during Friday prayers should its demands for an immediate halt to attacks in the UK and against British forces overseas not be met. The statement is also believed to have called for the internment of all Muslims in Great Britain within the next month and in the meantime for them to be placed under house arrest, pending what it ominously described as “processing”. ………………………………………………………………………………………. Fortunately, the above “news story” is totally fictional. So why did I bother to write it and post it? Well, I’m pretty much sure it will get a lot of attention, and maybe quite a few comments too. But mainly, my point was to ask the question as to whether the radical elements of Islam have shot the religion to which they claim to belong, squarely in the foot? The way I see it, many of us in the west had a lot of sympathy for the plight of the Palestinians. Many of us had a lot of sympathy for the Iraqis under Saddam, and many more strongly disagreed with the strategic blunder that was the invasion and is the occupation. Yet I wonder how much sympathy we can maintain, when it is not those responsible who suffer radical Islamic reprisals but we the innocent ordinary people? The “news story” I wrote is meant to turn the situation around, by way of innocent ordinary Muslims becoming the target for reprisals by our own hot heads. Do we see the similarities between my fictional neo-nazis and the radical Islamics or do we choose sides? Do we in some way sympathise with the nazi threats or even support them as “getting our own back” whilst condemning the Islamic radicals, or reject the hatred and violence of both sides? And, do we give any consideration to the antagonism and injustices felt by either side as not so much a justification, but an explanation for their words and actions? E
_____________________________
In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.
|