RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


slaveluci -> RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? (7/5/2007 7:02:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol
luci, you and I both know how much you enjoy getting your knickers in a twist, so I'm happy to have given you yet another opportunity to get riled up.

It's funny how everytime I disagree with you, I'm only getting my knickers in a twist.  You make great proclamations of epiphanies you have and spread philosophies and I, well I, only get my knickers in a twist....lol.....anyway........
quote:

HOWEVER, I have to say that it would be good, in the interest of accuracy, that you read through the thread again and managed to get my point.

I read the entire thread and I did, somehow, manage to get your point.
quote:

If you felt insulted by my deliberately provocative generalizations,

I did not feel insulted.  I was simply stating my opinion.  I did, however, fail to grasp the genius of your deliberately provocative generalizations.  Just sounded like the same generalizations I hear over and over and frankly, I have as little tolerance for them as I do the racism that goes in the other direction.  If you were somehow attempting brilliant satire, I guess I did miss it.
quote:

I can only recommend you take a course on self-esteem

And I would recommend that, once again, you stop assuming that folks lack either self-esteem, intelligence, or common sense simply because they fail to worship at the altar of your words.
quote:

 my point was made at some inherently racist folks around here, people who don't think twice about insulting others because of their nationality, or ethnic origin, or even faith

Boy, do I know that.  As a Christian, I've been stereotyped and insulted on here more times than I can count.  Maybe even by you, I can't recall.
quote:

So I ask that YOU, of all people, call a spade a spade

And, as I said, I did.......Peace to you........luci





uwinceismile -> RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? (7/5/2007 8:15:29 PM)

its gettin hot in here~~~~~
so take offf all your clothes~~~~~




TankII7871 -> RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? (7/5/2007 8:40:07 PM)

Thats it none of ya'll are invited to my Christmas party.  Im going back to cleaning my gun collection ya'll have a nice night.


just a Country Boy with a little learnin

Eric




uwinceismile -> RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? (7/5/2007 8:51:08 PM)

oh great.....
now on top of everything else, i gotta figure out where im eatin x mas dinner this year [&o]
WAY TO GO GUYS!!!!!




NorthernGent -> RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? (7/5/2007 9:00:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

The solution from the liberal side of the table to achieve equality is to make one group of people 'more equal' than others. It's pervasive in employment, housing, and banking. As if there wasn't enough resentment between the races, ages, and genders. At least it gives an excuse to those who don't get a job. It is most unfair to minorities. Imagine how the minority hire feels to be considered 'not as good' in the eyes of the government and requiring an AA/EEO program to get beyond his/her handicap of being born black. 

Liberals think the concept worked so well they thought it would be a great idea to apply the concept to crime.



I didn't realise you're the authority on Liberalism, Merc, but seeing as you now speak for the liberal side of the fence I'll help you with an obvious gap in your wisdom:

There is a concept called positive action, and it is distinct from the positive discrimination you describe. Look it up, and it will help you understand the "liberal solution".




NorthernGent -> RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? (7/5/2007 9:22:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CollarMaster1

blacks were not the only people enslaved...thru history..virtually all people have been slaves at one time or another..blacks are merely the last...they need to get over it ..



Well, maybe it's fresh in peoples' minds. It's only 40 years ago that blacks were the victims of lynchings etc in the US. This distinguishes bigotry aimed at the black community to calling someone a ginger wanker.

It is wide of the mark to attempt to equate the treatment dished out to blacks for 400 years to "virtually all people". Whether or not you want to do something to redress the balance is another matter.




Owner59 -> RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? (7/5/2007 10:12:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SubinMaine

quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveluci

quote:

ORIGINAL: SubinMaine
The altercation was viewed as a "racial" hate crime because the two participants were of different races and racial slurs were exchanged

And because the African-American fellow is the one who was the "victim" of the "hateful" words.  Somehow I doubt if the tables were turned and the only "racial slurs" flying were toward the Caucasian fellow, things would have been much different and it wouldn't have been considered a "hate crime."............luci


you are incorrect, luci...the other gentleman threw the first "racial slur" by telling my friend he was going to "shoot his white ass."

You see, BOTH parties used racial slurs (as i stated in my post), BOTH should have been held accountable if that's the way the law was written, however that's NOT how it was handled.

See why it irritates me? It's reverse discrimination...no one was justified in tossing the names around, but both were guilty of it...why was my friend singled out?

And i don't believe i stated whether one was African American or not....

*edited to add*

Growing up we used a sing-song phrase...remember? "Sticks and stones...." 

Also i feel my point is being missed after Luci's response....my point is that Race should be left out of the "Crime Time"...i will concede that exceptions should be made (example, White Supremacists, Neo-Nazi's, Nation of Islam and any other racially biased group that encourages the hate of one for the glory of the other)....dictating to a person what they can and can't say when it's a matter of opinion and not public safety (can't yell fire in a crowded theater = public safety issue) is, in my opinion, oppressing the right to freedom of speech.

mind you, the racial slur that my friend used was just as "mild" as the one used towards him, the only reason the authorities let the slur be admissable in court is due to the fact that it was voiced DURING the altercation and not before or after.



  Some things about this story seem bogus.

You say ,"my friend did what *ANYONE*, would have done, no matter their race and defended himself...the problem was, he got the better of this gentleman and, during the altercation, used a racial slur."

In other words,your brain-trust of a friend ,beat a guy up..., and used racial slurs while he beat him.I like your use of the phrase," he prevailed in the altercation". I think committed an assault, would be more honest.

Stupid people, who do stupid things,get into trouble(hopefully).When I heard this all started over sports teams ,I knew we were not dealing with smart people here,your friend or the other guy.My dad used to tell my brothers and I, never argue with a stupid person,someone watching might not be able to tell who`s who(much less law enforcement).I`ve lost count of all the times I just turned my back on a bully,or dolt,or a stupid person trying to start something.

I`m not a cop or a lawyer,but after teaching karate for twenty years, questions often come up about what`s legal and not,when confronted in the real world.
The law says(in most states),that when you`re confronted or menaced,you have to retreat(unless you`re in your home).No hitting the guy,or knocking him down,like Chuck Norris.There are a lot of confused folks,who think that you can hit someone , when they spit in your face, push you in a bar or parking lot,or call your girlfriend a whore,like in the movies.Not so,you can only use violence legally,if  there`s no other way around it.You can`t just think a guy`s got a gun,to beat him up,even if you think, "it`s what "*ANYONE*" would do."

Believe me,if you get into a full-out fight w/ someone,no matter who`s right,the cops are going to scrutinize you,back and forth.You had better be a true victim,otherwise you`re in trouble.

I tell my students to never use ,or even mention they train in martial arts.Just back away and move on.Don`t answer back,or stand off to fight or bump chests,etc.Unless you`re looking for trouble,and believe me,if you want trouble,there`s plenty to be had,knock yourself out.(pun intended)

Your friend was dumb enough to get sucked into trash talk about sports teams?!? w/ another bone head,dumb enough to use racial slurs ,while hitting the guy,and dumb enough to get caught.WTF was he thinking?"hey..,the cops will see it my way, when I tell`m I thought the guy was strapped.After all,"anyone" would see it that way,right?". "Oh,and the racial slurs?(he-he),he said "white ass",so thought it was ok to call him a "%$#@*% ",while I beat on him.

lol,give me a break.I don`t think your buddy was a victim of this law,but rather a victim of being an idiot.

This law was put in place for a reason.When you burn a Cross,paint nazi symbols on a Temple,lynch someone,beat up/kill a gay guy,deface a Mosque ,you oppress whole groups of people.Hate is huge in this country,only followed by stupidity.Mixed,they can be lethal. The folks opposing these laws offer no alternative,or even acknowledge that there`s a problem.So they lash out at those awful liberals,play the victim,and invent conspiracy theories about the ACLU,or other groups they don`t understand.Cry me a river,lol.

The ACLU,is about following the Constitution,the whole Constitution.They defend,help enforce,and push for what it says,every part and phrase.The Constitution, is the most liberal document written, in three thousand years.The American Civil Liberties Union doesn`t have a agenda,other than following the Constitution.I wish more people would have an allegiance to the Constitution,rather then to the GOP.That stands for "Good`ol Party",or the republicans.

Some advice....
When called names,confronted,spit on,belittled or mocked,  walk in the other direction. I know that doesn`t seem fair or logical,to bad.

Peace




SubinMaine -> RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? (7/6/2007 2:39:26 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Some advice....
When called names,confronted,spit on,belittled or mocked,  walk in the other direction. I know that doesn`t seem fair or logical,to bad.

Peace



If you say so....but then he was under the impression that the gentleman had a gun he was reaching for...kinda hard to walk away from a bullet.  Whether or not the gun was there is a moot point, it was IMPLIED by the other gentleman with the "I'm gonna shoot your _____ ass" comment.  So, my friend reacted.  Never once did i defend him for his actions, only that he shouldn't have had extra time for mere words.  He didn't start the altercation, but he finished it and was labled a racist.  The kid doesn't have a racist bone in his body!  It's laughable...but that's ok, you (and the others that want to) can continue to try and pick apart what happened because your "take" on it is more accurate than my account of it...i understand, what happened doesn't fit into how some people see thing should happen therefor, it's wrong, or a lie or *eyeroll* whatever. 

There was a point to my stating what happened.  Whether you choose to see it or choose to tear it down, have at it. *smile*




Owner59 -> RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? (7/6/2007 7:03:24 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SubinMaine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Some advice....
When called names,confronted,spit on,belittled or mocked,  walk in the other direction. I know that doesn`t seem fair or logical,to bad.

Peace



If you say so....but then he was under the impression that the gentleman had a gun he was reaching for...kinda hard to walk away from a bullet.  Whether or not the gun was there is a moot point, it was IMPLIED by the other gentleman with the "I'm gonna shoot your _____ ass" comment.  So, my friend reacted.  Never once did i defend him for his actions, only that he shouldn't have had extra time for mere words.  He didn't start the altercation, but he finished it and was labled a racist.  The kid doesn't have a racist bone in his body!  It's laughable...but that's ok, you (and the others that want to) can continue to try and pick apart what happened because your "take" on it is more accurate than my account of it...i understand, what happened doesn't fit into how some people see thing should happen therefor, it's wrong, or a lie or *eyeroll* whatever. 

There was a point to my stating what happened.  Whether you choose to see it or choose to tear it down, have at it. *smile*


Not at all,in fact,you should have run away.I would have shielded my girlfriend`s body with mine and said,"it`s cool" as I backed away.I wouldn`t step to the guy,like I was a TV hero or Superman.And,not for nothing, I wouldn`t have even  been acknowledging the douche bag in the 1st place,much less exchanging trash talk about sports .(I don`t get sport heads,there`s way to much free time out there,lol)

What was he thinking,getting into it w/ a stranger,and over sports?!?!? My girlfriend would be clubbing me,... for even talking to a dolt like that,much less arrested for scraping with him.

Please ,...good people of CM,don`t do stuff like this.This isn`t a storyline with happy endings, that make sense like on TV.This is real life,and life is a roulette wheel,don`t play games over dumb stuff,you will lose in the end.

Don`t acknowledge bullys,or even look their way.Don`t give tit for tat,proving your manhood,jawing over sports teams,that`s for alimentary school kids.If you fantasize about touting a pistol,just in case you run into guys like that,keep it a fantasy.

Peace




kittinSol -> RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? (7/6/2007 8:35:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

This law was put in place for a reason.When you burn a Cross,paint nazi symbols on a Temple,lynch someone,beat up/kill a gay guy,deface a Mosque ,you oppress whole groups of people.Hate is huge in this country,only followed by stupidity.Mixed,they can be lethal. The folks opposing these laws offer no alternative,or even acknowledge that there`s a problem.So they lash out at those awful liberals,play the victim,and invent conspiracy theories about the ACLU,or other groups they don`t understand.Cry me a river,lol.

The ACLU,is about following the Constitution,the whole Constitution.They defend,help enforce,and push for what it says,every part and phrase.The Constitution, is the most liberal document written, in three thousand years.The American Civil Liberties Union doesn`t have a agenda,other than following the Constitution.I wish more people would have an allegiance to the Constitution,rather then to the GOP.That stands for "Good`ol Party",or the republicans.

Some advice....
When called names,confronted,spit on,belittled or mocked,  walk in the other direction. I know that doesn`t seem fair or logical,to bad.

Peace



Hear, hear.




uwinceismile -> RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? (7/6/2007 10:01:59 AM)

i find it humorous, that when faced with a life an death situation on the street (as she has layed out here) you are calm , cool , and collected in the way you would of handled it.
but here on the board, you are quick to call her friend stupid , an idiot and the like???
while i agree with your thoughts that fighting is stupid, and always a last resort..(thats how i was raised)
its not unheard of in this time in which we live, to have a gun drawn on u.we read about it all the time [&o]..
i guess i have a hard time understanding why peeps are so quick to critize, and name call?




Alumbrado -> RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? (7/6/2007 12:21:11 PM)

quote:

I`m not a cop or a lawyer,but after teaching karate for twenty years, questions often come up about what`s legal and not,when confronted in the real world.
The law says(in most states),that when you`re confronted or menaced,you have to retreat(unless you`re in your home).


No state requires anyone to just blindly retreat from a threat, if doing so would expose them to danger... the confusion over so called 'retreat to the wall' statutes stems from the requirement in  some states that other options to deadly force be unavailable.

If you shoot someone, and it is later shown that you could have reasonably and safely retreated instead, then your claim of self defense is weakened.

But the notion that anybody would be required to allow someone to shoot or stab them or their loved ones while they try to maneuver their back to the nearest wall before they could act to stop the threat is a misconception.

Preemptive attacks to stop a real threat can in fact, be quite legal, under certain circumstances.




TankII7871 -> RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? (7/6/2007 4:29:31 PM)

OK ya'll ill let you in on my back ground a bit.  About 5 years ago i was on the river front in Savannah for new years eve. I had been drinking a little.  Some guy slapped my girls ass as we walked by she turned around and said something smart to him to which his reply was "fucking whore" .  Well i had been drinking enought to just not care or know my on strenght  i hit the guy he didnt drop like i expected so i hit him agian.  The second time he dropped the cops saw me hit him so they came ove to get me.  Now 4-5 girls all told the cops that the guy had done the same thing to them end result was i  recived a citation for disturbing the peace.  I figured it would be a nothing kind of thing  so i went in front of the judge with out a lawyer.  Boy did i mess up.  3 weeks anger managment 1 yearprobation and i had to pay all the guys medical bills. There were 2 things that worked out for me 1 i got off easy 2 the guy OD a week later so he never had all the plastic work done.  For those wondering he was black and about 1/2 my size and im white but there was no hate involved.  If i had hunted him down and did what i did to him because he was Black then it would have been a hat crime.  Yes i know i could have been charged with assult and sued out the ass.  to be honest if it happend agian i would do the same  im kinda protective of whats mine


just a country boy with a little learnin

Eric

p.s. spell check isnt working on this computer




Owner59 -> RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? (7/6/2007 8:37:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: uwinceismile

i find it humorous, that when faced with a life an death situation on the street (as she has layed out here) you are calm , cool , and collected in the way you would of handled it.
but here on the board, you are quick to call her friend stupid , an idiot and the like???
while i agree with your thoughts that fighting is stupid, and always a last resort..(thats how i was raised)
its not unheard of in this time in which we live, to have a gun drawn on u.we read about it all the time [&o]..
i guess i have a hard time understanding why peeps are so quick to critize, and name call?


I have  had a gun drawn on me,twice.Once by a stranger in a mall parking lot,when I was 18 y/o.An idiot  ex-friend of mine,was repeating the "n" word,over and over,softly at 1st,then louder and loader,till he got the strangers attention,and until the guy reacted.This man pulled a revolver and pointed it at us and then at the stupid friend, before I could gather what was happening.There were 8 of us.A cool headed guy in our group,cut in front of the bigoted jerk off,and asked nicely for the black guy  to put the gun away,which he did.To this guy,I`m sure we all seemed like bigots.You know,all bigots look alike...especially at night.

The other time,was by friend of a friend.This guy was half in the bag and pissed off at the world.He doesn`t own gun any more,from what I hear,and thank god.

Both times,running at the gun holder,and trying to dis-arm him, would be,...well,... stupid.Saying that`s a good idea, would be reckless.Most people would run away.
Dear friends,...you all should as well,it`s your best chance.Don`t play super-hero.

And don`t start something with a stranger.He might be high,or armed,or have a car full of buddys outside,possibly a car full stoned,armed buddys outside,or even crazy enough pull a bottle of Pepsi on you.

Let us not forget,there was no gun.There was no life or death situation here,just two sport heads arguing about the meaningless.I don`t buy the "anyone would think the same thing"line.Not everyone looks for trouble,or butts heads with ass holes in the crowd,or gets arrested for fighting.I bet alcohol was involved,by one or both of them.

As for name calling,I call them as I see them. I never let political correctness stop me from expressing myself.This guy was clearly a dumbass.He has only himself to blame.
If the President of the US is a fucking idiot,I don`t let PC stop me from saying it.Even if it pisses the cool-aid drinkers off.
Have we ever had a dumber guy in office?I don`t think so,and screw anyone who doesn`t like hearing it said.This isn`t Russia or China,yet.Do you find that humorous?

Peace






Owner59 -> RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? (7/6/2007 8:57:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TankII7871

OK ya'll ill let you in on my back ground a bit.  About 5 years ago i was on the river front in Savannah for new years eve. I had been drinking a little.  Some guy slapped my girls ass as we walked by she turned around and said something smart to him to which his reply was "fucking whore" .  Well i had been drinking enought to just not care or know my on strenght  i hit the guy he didnt drop like i expected so i hit him agian.  The second time he dropped the cops saw me hit him so they came ove to get me.  Now 4-5 girls all told the cops that the guy had done the same thing to them end result was i  recived a citation for disturbing the peace.  I figured it would be a nothing kind of thing  so i went in front of the judge with out a lawyer.  Boy did i mess up.  3 weeks anger managment 1 yearprobation and i had to pay all the guys medical bills. There were 2 things that worked out for me 1 i got off easy 2 the guy OD a week later so he never had all the plastic work done.  For those wondering he was black and about 1/2 my size and im white but there was no hate involved.  If i had hunted him down and did what i did to him because he was Black then it would have been a hat crime.  Yes i know i could have been charged with assult and sued out the ass.  to be honest if it happend agian i would do the same  im kinda protective of whats mine


just a country boy with a little learnin

Eric

p.s. spell check isnt working on this computer


I would be tempted to do the same thing,men are hard wired like that.lol

But every time you do stuff like that,you expose yourself to a world of shit.You were lucky.Another cop might have charged you,the ass slapper could`ve sued you,lawyers bills,a record,etc.Just ask SubinMaine`s friend.It`s a spin of the roulette wheel every time and  not everyone may be as lucky as you were.

People at my home, know there`s a dog who doesn`t suffer assholes well,and they behave.lol




Owner59 -> RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? (7/6/2007 9:42:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

quote:

I`m not a cop or a lawyer,but after teaching karate for twenty years, questions often come up about what`s legal and not,when confronted in the real world.
The law says(in most states),that when you`re confronted or menaced,you have to retreat(unless you`re in your home).


No state requires anyone to just blindly retreat from a threat, if doing so would expose them to danger... the confusion over so called 'retreat to the wall' statutes stems from the requirement in  some states that other options to deadly force be unavailable.

If you shoot someone, and it is later shown that you could have reasonably and safely retreated instead, then your claim of self defense is weakened.

But the notion that anybody would be required to allow someone to shoot or stab them or their loved ones while they try to maneuver their back to the nearest wall before they could act to stop the threat is a misconception.

Preemptive attacks to stop a real threat can in fact, be quite legal, under certain circumstances.


"No state requires anyone to just blindly retreat from a threat, if doing so would expose them to danger... the confusion over so called 'retreat to the wall' statutes stems from the requirement in  some states that other options to deadly force be unavailable."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




True,a home is his castle(at least for now).No law prevents a man(or woman) from protecting himself or his family,quite the opposite.But if laws weren`t designed to compel people retreat if possible,you`d have the wild wild west(the bad one).Violence is only sanctioned when there is no other way(in most states)And anyone who gets shot invading a residence, deserves every grain of lead.

If you really want good home protection,a dog and a shot gun are what you want.IMO
Thugs (and also cops),are affraid of dogs.It`s a primal instict to fear them,if you`re up to no good.Bad guys don`t walk towards barking dogs,...hell, I wouldn`t.

Pre-emptive attacts? hmmmm,Doesn`t that sound familiar?(did someone say neo-con dummy?)Again,step lightly,and don`t get yourself into trouble.And don`t argue w/ strangers.If a guy invades your home,shoot low.BTW,you`re more likely to shoot a family member or friend,then a perp. You should  know that too.



Peace




uwinceismile -> RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? (7/6/2007 11:31:44 PM)

yep,,ur an effing riot




Sinergy -> RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? (7/7/2007 2:29:10 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SubinMaine

kinda hard to walk away from a bullet. 



According to the gun expert we have in to teach these things to our defense against the armed assailant classes, the odds of getting hit by a bullet drop dramatically as you move away from the gun.

In other words, odds are not all that great for the person using the gun at 2 feet, odds are almost infinitismally small that you will get hit at 10 feet, and drop further after that.

In other words, it is actually easier to walk away from a bullet than it is to stand there and let the person shoot you.

Statistically, one in four shots to the head is lethal.  One in ten shots to the torso is lethal.

Standing there and letting the person pop a cap in your ass seems like the height of stupidity, or a triumph of ego over reason.

Sinergy




Owner59 -> RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? (7/7/2007 6:08:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: uwinceismile

i dont see why any crime should be tainted by race?
i thought that justice was blind? ;)
if a white supremacy group member, or the nation of islam member break a law,,,then procecute for the law they have broken. its not against the law to hate .


True, it`s not.But it is illegal to act on it,or encourage others to act.And thank god for that!
You`re also conflating race with hate.It`s not about race.It`s about hate.It could be hate of a race,and it could be about hate of gays,or cross-dressers.Hate is the common denominator here.

In 1990,a bigot named Tom Metzger,talked some kids into attacking a black man.It was totally random,any black guy would do.The kids ended up beating an African  immigrant to death.The guy was from Ethiopia,legally(it`s a shame that I even have to mention that fact at all)Metzger,a white supremacists,was held libel,even though he didn`t participate in the beating,never met the dead man,or knew his name.Yet he lost everything.His money and property and his liberty. He was held libel for instigating the crime,even though he never ordered the death,or knew when and where it took place.The boys who did the murder,though guilty as sin,were also victims of hate,their lives ruined forever.You want to defend this crap?lolThink about what the families went through.The victims folks,the killer`s families.Think about the hate groups that want to put people in fear by targeting them for crime.Metzger filled their heads with hate,fear and loathing.All legal,until the boys acted on it,and killed a man.

It`s not illegal to teach hate.It happens ever Sunday morning, in churches everywhere.
But it`s wrong,and harmful,and it`s anti-American.

Hate, is only one of many aggravating circumstances,that a crime can contain.
Not all crime has hate as a component.If I dump chemicals into a stream,that`s a crime.No hate involved.If I dump chemicals down your water well,or on your property to ruin it,because I want to "drive your kind out`a town",now that`s a bit different.Same crime,right?Yes.Same context?Nope.

These are hard concepts to comprehend.For some people,if it doesn`t make sense to them,then it can`t possible make sense to anyone else.Get it?
Ever try to talk to a right winger about global warming?He`ll tell you it a farce,because Fox News said so,and that it isn`t that hot where he happens to live.lol Not even on his radar screen.
A guy like that will never understand what global warming is,or concepts that big or complicated.If it can fit on a bumper sticker,maybe.

Here`s something I have always found humorous......uwinceismile,


Why is anyone fighting for the rights of  criminals,to be bigoted?Their right to hate?A killer`s right,, to not be judged for his thoughts,because he targeted a racial group,or a gay guy for death? Low life scum who kill and maim,for hate`s sake,...you want to help them out?LOL This has always intrigued me,so maybe you can fill me in.

Aren`t there any other down trodden groups you can feel sorry for?Pigeon killers or frog smashers?They need a voice too.

Peace










Owner59 -> RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? (7/7/2007 6:27:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

We need to start turning these laws around and start using them against all the PC, commie groups like the ACLU, Southern Poverty Law Center etc.
"What!? You "HATE" the "KKK?"
"Lawsuit! Lawsuit!"
How did such a small group of people get to decide which laws we should have?



http://www.splcenter.org/index.jsp

BTW




The Souther poverty Law Center (SPLC) is an American non-profit legal organization, whose purpose is to combat racism and promote civil rights...
 
Guess we know which side of these issues you`re on...............
 
Also,just read that hate groups are infiltrating our military.........God help us.




Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875