iFraudius
Posts: 18
Joined: 5/16/2006 Status: offline
|
As my profile indicates (somewhat sarcastically) my feelings about the "it's not about sex" crowd reflect what LuckyAlbatross says, these are issues about sex, the same sort vanilla people with issues about sex (and intimacy) have. The difference is that D/s BDSM provides (for some) a great place to hide from intimacy, while cloaking one's self in a mantle of more "honorable intentions," (as if there's something ... dirty? cheap? crude? self-serving?) about sexual desires and expression, incorporated into that paradigm. That doesn't mean that service must include sex, nor that it ultimately will result in intimacy. Some of the longest relationships where I'm considered by some, to be of service, and by others, both submissive and of service, are ones where I have no sexual involvement, although there's no barrier to it, save perhaps mutual desire. I've engaged in relationships where I have deliberately held off on sexual intimacy while attempting to gauge the nature of the (submissive) individual and what might or might not be, comfortable and appropriate. But I do not go looking for primary relationships feeling the need to make a declaration about sex playing a secondary or nonexistent role, nor would I consider one with someone else who did.
_____________________________
"I've been where you're hanging, I think I can see how you're pinned. When you're not feeling holy, your loneliness says that you've sinned." - Leonard Cohen
|