Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: how old?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: how old? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: how old? - 7/7/2007 1:32:48 PM   
tricia


Posts: 231
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
stateira,
 
I think it depends on what kind of Master or Dom you are seeking, as well.  my owner is not A Master- he is a dominant male who is my Master.

For instance:

quote:

Master - 10+ years of r/t; they have common sence; they are respected and have referances; they have taken classes or attended workshops and know what they are doing; they desire to have a slave. 


The only thing this tells me is the master she refers to knows how to go through the motions of being a dominant male.  And he enjoys learning how to safely practice bdsm.  For all we know, he runs off to make sure his wifes dinner is prepared and to finish up the laundry.  Not that there is anything wrong with that - just simply not the kind of Dom/Master i want and i don't particularly care how many references he had.

(in reply to submittous)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: how old? - 7/7/2007 3:22:22 PM   
chellekitty


Posts: 3923
Joined: 3/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slaverosebeauty

{leaves the board before the flames start}


why post these illogical, irrational, personal opinions as pure fact? when you could have stopped the flames by saying, for me, a top is this a dom is that and a master is all of it with wiffle ball bat?

there is no set time period because all people learn at different rates....a person who gets thru medical school in 3 years is a doctor just the same as the person who got thru medical school in 7 years...

if you are a weekend warrior with once a month "meetings" with a bottom of some sort you will learn a lot slower than if you decide to grow with a 24/7 partner...

no, i don't agree, Dominant is a sexual preference, not a status, same with submissive

yes, i agree that you should have some skills to be a Master...and i'll agree, that by my definition, a person is a Master when they have a slave, UNLESS they are honored by the community with the title, or they have actually Mastered a skill...but then i would say you put their skill before the title... WhipMaster, RopeMaster, whatever...

i don't know about you, but when i was growing up...i had relationships, romantic even, before i turned 18...i also knew how to read and knew how to lie about my age on message boards and chat rooms to get the help i needed dealing with D/s dynamics in my relationships...

i am 24...i am not a slave because i don't want to be one...its not all its cracked up to be for someone like me...i march to the beat of my own drum...i don't want to follow anyone elses beat and i don't want to lead anyone else...i could be owned 100 times by now if i wanted to enter a M/s relationship...i don't want to...

chelle
House Infernus

PS...you can relive flaming/hurt feelings/arguments in SOOOO many arena's (message boards, work, relationships, etc) by using I statements...its a valuable communication skill...if you don't want to use first person, there are plenty of third person options...

(in reply to slaverosebeauty)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: how old? - 7/7/2007 4:32:51 PM   
LotusSong


Posts: 6334
Joined: 7/2/2006
From: Domme Emeritus
Status: offline
This is my opinion:  It all depends upon experience.  If all you have been doing is having sex, it doesn't count.  What skills have you developed?  How well can you read a person?  How much responsibility do you take for your own actions?  And most important of all, WHY do you wish to be a Dom/me? 

_____________________________

Life Lesson #1

I'm not your type.
I'm not inflatable.


(in reply to stateira)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: how old? - 7/7/2007 7:13:04 PM   
Rover


Posts: 2634
Joined: 6/28/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MsPleasure

I think it depends on the person.  Ive talked to a Domme that was 3rd generation.  It was an open profession in her family so of course she was an expert at a very young age.


Given the fact that...
 
1.  The overwhelming majority of leather oriented parents go to great lengths to keep their lifestyle interests from their children.
 
2.  Three generations is precariously close to the beginnings of organized S/M (not D/s, which is a much later derivation) in the US.
 
3.  Women (and heterosexuals) were not welcome participants in those early days.
 
4.  What we call "D/s" is a relatively recent creation, coinciding with the inclusion of heterosexuals in leather.
 
5.  Heterosexual & lesbian participation in S/M was relegated to personal ads in the backs of magazines, of limited popularity in the 1960's. 
 
... I'd be willing to bet dollars to donuts that those previous two generations are a fabrication (though it is not entirely beyond the realm of possibility, just beyond probability).  On the small chance that this isn't a hoax, they have a great story to tell and I'd like to help them share it with an article in Leather Journey magazine.  Please have them contact me.
 
John

_____________________________

"Man's mind stretched to a new idea never goes back to its original dimensions."

Sri da Avabhas

(in reply to MsPleasure)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: how old? - 7/7/2007 8:25:57 PM   
Hina00


Posts: 20
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline
I think it's something you have to be born with. It's deep inside you, like some cynical urge that you can't control, even if it pains you to have these thoughts, you go through what your body needs.
But, without the proper understanding ( which includes experience! ) I don't think it makes sence to call yourself a Master or a Slave...

(in reply to Faramir)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: how old? - 7/7/2007 9:06:26 PM   
Slavetrainer2007


Posts: 231
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slaverosebeauty

quote:

ORIGINAL: stateira
About how old should a person be before they can call themselves "Dom" or "Master"? 


Top - Any time after they make the decision to put time and effort into learning about D/s as a whole and in r/t NOT cyber/online time. One can stay at this level as long as they desire. 
 
Dom - 5 years after they take the above step and have an idea what they are doing and do NOT desire a slave, since Doms can have subs and not slaves. One can stay at this place indefinatly.
 
Master - 10+ years of r/t; they have common sence; they are respected and have referances; they have taken classes or attended workshops and know what they are doing; they desire to have a slave.
 
----
 
Someone in thier 20s doesn't have enough expereicne in life to be a 'Master;' its not logical or safe.
 
Note - o/l relationships are NOT subject to any of the above rules, since all of the above are reserved for r/t relationships.  

{leaves the board before the flames start}


I would be a 4th level Dom then or is it an Apprentice Master?

OP:  People like to use  age and years of experience to determine ones abilities. Unfortunately this is about as dangerous as playing Russian Roulette.  Age means absolutely  nothing except that you been alive X amount of years.

Experience matters some, but to much emphasis is put on experience. Experience does not  ever equal abilities. BDSM, D/s, M/S or whatever else you want to tag it with  requires only common sense and desire to learn. Sure their are tricks of the trade you can learn from experienced lifestylers.  But more or less the common sense has to be there.

Age is by far  not an indicator of experience in anything. And that misconception is the first thing anyone needs to learn.

A little story: I am a carpenter and have been for 8 years. I learned like i learn most everything else hands on. I often do work for a contractor who builds homes.  He usually builds simple homes. This past winter he built his own house which was  quite a bit more elaborate than  ones  he normally builds to sell.  When he showed us the blueprint he asked if we  were capable of building this house.  We said of course, why couldnt we? He goes are you sure because i cant build this house it has to many angles and is to complicated. And we , rather puzzled told him yes.

He has been a carpenter for 15 years and could not build his own house. I have been a carpenter for 8 years  and along with a friend who has been a carpenter 10 years, built his house.

He has twice as much experience as me,  and near 20 years older. Yet i can build a house he cannot. If this was your house and i had to compete with him for a bid to build it and you went on the older<clears throat> more wiser of us,  their is no telling what would of happened.

In this case  going on age and experience  would of been a poor choice. The younger and less  experienced carpenter's abilities  exceed that of the older and more experienced carpenter.

So do you want a Dom  that is 45 with 15 years of experience in BDSM or do you want a Dom that is 22 with 3 years experience? Me i would skip the numbers and look at abilties, but hey im not the one putting my life in someone elses hands:)

_____________________________

Life is given, Everything else is earned.

(in reply to slaverosebeauty)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: how old? - 7/7/2007 9:07:13 PM   
Arpig


Posts: 9930
Joined: 1/3/2006
From: Increasingly further from reality
Status: offline
Rover...what makes you think there was no S&M before it was "organized". It seems to me that the good old Marquis was around writing about it a few generations more than 3.
People have been engaging in S/M and D/S relationships since there were people, just as their have been gays and lesbians (ever heard of Sappho?). Nothing in sex is new, it has all been done before.

_____________________________

Big man! Pig Man!
Ha Ha...Charade you are!


Why do they leave out the letter b on "Garage Sale" signs?

CM's #1 All-Time Also-Ran


(in reply to Rover)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: how old? - 7/7/2007 9:13:55 PM   
Slavetrainer2007


Posts: 231
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig

Rover...what makes you think there was no S&M before it was "organized". It seems to me that the good old Marquis was around writing about it a few generations more than 3.
People have been engaging in S/M and D/S relationships since there were people, just as their have been gays and lesbians (ever heard of Sappho?). Nothing in sex is new, it has all been done before.


THATS were the got the caveman dragging the cavewoman by the hair cartoon!

_____________________________

Life is given, Everything else is earned.

(in reply to Arpig)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: how old? - 7/7/2007 9:27:48 PM   
Rover


Posts: 2634
Joined: 6/28/2004
Status: offline
To begin, if it's not organized then what is being passed down from generation to generation and from where was it learned in the first place?  We're not talking about an old family recipe for soup here.
 
Second, I ask where any of us would be without the benefit of organization and history.  Had any of us not beneftitted from the organized lifestyle and it's history, we wouldn't know our floggers from a hole in the ground.  Some still don't.
 
Your logic is flawed.
 
John



_____________________________

"Man's mind stretched to a new idea never goes back to its original dimensions."

Sri da Avabhas

(in reply to Arpig)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: how old? - 7/7/2007 10:08:46 PM   
Arpig


Posts: 9930
Joined: 1/3/2006
From: Increasingly further from reality
Status: offline
quote:

To begin, if it's not organized then what is being passed down from generation to generation and from where was it learned in the first place?  We're not talking about an old family recipe for soup here.

Well then, just where did those wonderful people who first "organized" BDSM learn it? Maybe they made it up as they went along? Maybe they read any number of anonymous victorian smut-novels (A Man With A Maid comes to mind).
quote:

Second, I ask where any of us would be without the benefit of organization and history.  Had any of us not beneftitted from the organized lifestyle and it's history, we wouldn't know our floggers from a hole in the ground.  Some still don't.

This is baloney. I have in no way benefitted from any "organization" and the history I refer to far outdates 2-3 generations. When you sayorganized,  I assume you are refering to the infamous and semi-legendary "Old Guard". While they did make up some nifty rules and protocols, they never were the be-all and end-all of the lifestyle, they were just one small group who liked to have strict protocols in place. Straights and lesbians have been whacking eachother on the ass as long as gays have, it is simply ridiculous to assume that BDSM started in the 50s...like I said before it has always been with us.
There is NO organized BDSM, there are only small groups who have organized out of a mutual desire for formal structure, there are any number of these groups each practicing their kink according to their own rules, and then there are even more people who have nothing to do with any organization, who simply live the lifestyle the way they see fit.


_____________________________

Big man! Pig Man!
Ha Ha...Charade you are!


Why do they leave out the letter b on "Garage Sale" signs?

CM's #1 All-Time Also-Ran


(in reply to Rover)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: how old? - 7/7/2007 10:39:54 PM   
Rover


Posts: 2634
Joined: 6/28/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig

quote:

To begin, if it's not organized then what is being passed down from generation to generation and from where was it learned in the first place?  We're not talking about an old family recipe for soup here.

Well then, just where did those wonderful people who first "organized" BDSM learn it? Maybe they made it up as they went along? Maybe they read any number of anonymous victorian smut-novels (A Man With A Maid comes to mind).


Ok, perhaps you're the one in a million that had a developed version of BDSM prior to your discovery of it.  But I'm guessing not, though it's always possible that you were masturbating to Victorian smut, just as the Victorians did.  Not sure what that taught you, though... masturbation IS something that most people take to intuitively.

quote:

 
Second, I ask where any of us would be without the benefit of organization and history.  Had any of us not beneftitted from the organized lifestyle and it's history, we wouldn't know our floggers from a hole in the ground.  Some still don't.


quote:


This is baloney. I have in no way benefitted from any "organization" and the history I refer to far outdates 2-3 generations. When you sayorganized,  I assume you are refering to the infamous and semi-legendary "Old Guard". While they did make up some nifty rules and protocols, they never were the be-all and end-all of the lifestyle, they were just one small group who liked to have strict protocols in place. Straights and lesbians have been whacking eachother on the ass as long as gays have, it is simply ridiculous to assume that BDSM started in the 50s...like I said before it has always been with us.
There is NO organized BDSM, there are only small groups who have organized out of a mutual desire for formal structure, there are any number of these groups each practicing their kink according to their own rules, and then there are even more people who have nothing to do with any organization, who simply live the lifestyle the way they see fit.


Actually, it's not baloney nor any other lunchmeat.  Even if your BDSM education is nothing more than reading online websites such as this, what you're learning is firmly founded in organized BDSM and it's history.  No one here, least of all  you (or me), is making this up out of thin air.
 
The "history" you cite is not history, because it's not recorded.  If a kinky person lives and dies and makes no lasting mark upon the next kinky person, they've added nothing to the sum knowledge and history of kink.  They've simply vanished into obscurity.  Have kinky people been around since the dawn of man?  Absolutely.  So show me the history of those kinky people.  You can't because it doesn't exist.  They came and went without anyone having known who they are or what they learned.  And the next person (say... you) will have to learn it all over on their own, if they learn it at all.
 
As for your rendition of "Old Guard" history, you're correct in noting that it is semi-legendary, particularly online.  But they are historical, and historically accurate documentation exists.  You are not correct in stating that they're "one small group" (they were, in fact, many widely dispersed groups) or that they had "strict protocols in place" (some did, some didn't, but there was little in the way of uniformity from group to group beyond being exclusively gay men with a shared interest in S/M within a rigid armed-forces style heirarchy).  The term itself was coined as a derogatory reference to a people in time, much as one may refer to "medieval", rather than any specific protocols, beliefs or practices.
 
As for your usage of the term "organized", you're incorrect to portray it as some sort of unified governing body for all of BDSM.  BDSM is organized in online communities, local munches, regional and national groups such as The Eulenspiegal Society, The Society of Janus, the Leather Archives & Museum, etc.  And as a result, there is a record and method of passing information along from one person to the next, such that what is learned is not lost to posterity but becomes the informational foundation for everyone that "discovers" BDSM.  To say that it's not organized is to ignore what is readily apparent.
 
Even those that eschew organized BDSM learn from it.  It's impossible for them not to, presuming they are not in utter isolation with no knowledge that BDSM even exists.
 
I think you're having difficulty appreciating that there's a meaningful and fundamental difference between people "whacking away at one another", and learning about BDSM from one another via the organized dissemination of information and history.
 
John

< Message edited by Rover -- 7/7/2007 10:48:32 PM >


_____________________________

"Man's mind stretched to a new idea never goes back to its original dimensions."

Sri da Avabhas

(in reply to Arpig)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: how old? - 7/7/2007 10:41:50 PM   
MasterFireMaam


Posts: 5587
Joined: 3/1/2006
From: Charleston, WV
Status: offline
My philosphy is that it's nothing on me to call someone by their prefered title, it's up to them to live up to it.

Master Fire


_____________________________

The power of who we are can be intoxicating. The power of who we could be is humbling.
-----
Ms Relationship Books
-----
BDSM How-To Books

(in reply to stateira)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: how old? - 7/7/2007 10:49:22 PM   
Arpig


Posts: 9930
Joined: 1/3/2006
From: Increasingly further from reality
Status: offline
Well Rover I guess we are fated to disagree. I do not consider what you define as organized to be such...oh well to argue it further is simply semantics.

_____________________________

Big man! Pig Man!
Ha Ha...Charade you are!


Why do they leave out the letter b on "Garage Sale" signs?

CM's #1 All-Time Also-Ran


(in reply to Rover)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: how old? - 7/7/2007 10:50:45 PM   
LuckyAlbatross


Posts: 19224
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slaverosebeauty
{leaves the board before the flames start}


AKA "Leave before I'm called to the floor for my arbitrary ideas that I can't justify in any way"

_____________________________

Find stable partners, not a stable of partners.

"Sometimes my whore logic gets all fuzzy"- Californication

(in reply to slaverosebeauty)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: how old? - 7/7/2007 10:52:05 PM   
curvyslavegirl


Posts: 134
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
My main concern with younger "Masters" is that it is very hard to have Mastery over even your own life in your earlier years. Most people go through a tremendous amount of growth and change in their 20's. How many of you over 30 can honestly say that you have the same psychological, spiritual or emotional outlook that you had at age 20? I do think that Mastery of any subject requires years of both practice and an internal calling. It is possible that someone could have a Mastery of some particular skill quite young, but a Mastery of the psychological & spiritual side of D/s....I have my serious doubts. Yes, they could be growing in that direction. Yes, they might be fabulous tops & wonderful partners. But having Mastery....haven't seen it yet.

(in reply to Faramir)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: how old? - 7/7/2007 10:55:54 PM   
Rover


Posts: 2634
Joined: 6/28/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig

Well Rover I guess we are fated to disagree. I do not consider what you define as organized to be such...oh well to argue it further is simply semantics.


For the sake of better understanding your opinion, perhaps you'd describe your definition of "organized", explain how online communities, local munches, and regional and national organizations are not "organizated", and share your experiences with them in order to add context.
 
John

_____________________________

"Man's mind stretched to a new idea never goes back to its original dimensions."

Sri da Avabhas

(in reply to Arpig)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: how old? - 7/7/2007 11:09:01 PM   
chellekitty


Posts: 3923
Joined: 3/27/2005
Status: offline
i wanna be LadyMistressPookieBearWonderfulrifficChelle, please...

and the 3rd generation Domme was obviously descended from an ancient european house...but just by doing the math...assume her grandfather had her mother or father with her grandmother before the war then came back after the war, admitted he was gay, joined some old gaurd leather thingy something or other....then passed it down to her mother or father...who introduced it to their daughter...well after she was an established adult....i guess its feesable...i know many parents in the bdsm lifestyle who will, and do tell their ADULT offspring about their lifestyle...usually so they can avoid being at the same event cause the offspring found out thru whatever means

th-th-thats all folks...
chelle

(in reply to MasterFireMaam)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: how old? - 7/7/2007 11:20:56 PM   
Najakcharmer


Posts: 2121
Joined: 5/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MsPleasure

I think it depends on the person.  Ive talked to a Domme that was 3rd generation.  It was an open profession in her family so of course she was an expert at a very young age.


And I've talked to a 10th level Warrior Ninja Assassin who was born on the planet Gor.  He has 40 years of experience in the lifestyle even though he's only 23, because every week spent in his Yahoo chat room typing "On yr knees biotch" counts as a  year of real life.   At least that's how he explained it, and of course he must have been telling the truth.

Historically, there were such things as pro dommes - of a sort - in the Victorian era in London, England.  If memory serves, historian Ruay Tannahill had some interesting documentation.  Basically they were specialty prostitutes.  So it's at least theoretically possible, albeit unlikely, if this lady's family tree branches from the UK.  In America though, not so much of a history of "specialty brothels" dating that far back.

Whenever you hear stuff about being a 10th level Gorean ninja master or the heir to an ancient Victorian house of Real Twue Slave Keeping, it's generally time to get out the salt shaker and take such claims with a grain or two. 

(in reply to MsPleasure)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: how old? - 7/8/2007 6:41:10 AM   
Slavetrainer2007


Posts: 231
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: offline
Both Rover and Arpig have good points, but i dont think they are on the same page.

What we consider to be BDSM lifestyle now and how its generally lived now isnt the same as way back when. Like us it evolved, over time. Because its recorded and called different things  in the modern era doesnt mean it didnt exist back  hundreds or even thousands of years ago.

Is it more orgnaized now? Definately and it has its own following. But what people fail to remember is that culture has changed too, so the need to create organize and seek out  like minded individuals  has changed.

Men have had slaves since the beginning of time. While we view slavery as different now, we view it as different because its consentual. Slaves were owned  even thousands of years ago. Since slaves were even legally considered property, im sure much of the BDSM we have today stemmed from how  actual slaves were treated. Slaves have been used as  entertainment, service, for sexual pleasure for  at least a couple of thousand years.

Im sure there was  quite a bit of doucmentation on it, but being a common practice in a society in which only a select few can read, people gained knowledge as learned from society not from books as we so depend today. Slavery was part of  everyday life and one culture that comes to mind is the ancient greeks.

Even in medieval times women were considered inferior and basically servants to their husband.  you could beat your wife you could rape her. hell she didnt even have a choice in marriage most of the time.  women were tools.

In the past it was part of life, they had no need for documentation because thats how everyone was raised. Some are slaves, some are peasants, some are  nobles. It was a status you didnt have a choice in.

This is the BDSM Arpig is talking about. The roots as it were. Its not well documented because maybe 1 in every 100 people could read.

The recent organized BDSM developed from this. This is the organized  BDSM Rover is talking about. Its only been organized for a few decades, yet the roots of BDSM are thousands of years old. Only when it was organized  did it get a name. Back in the day it was simply keeping your slaves or wife in line or using them as  seen fit since they was yours. Uneducated societies dont find much  use for terms and definations.

< Message edited by Slavetrainer2007 -- 7/8/2007 6:45:19 AM >


_____________________________

Life is given, Everything else is earned.

(in reply to Najakcharmer)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: how old? - 7/8/2007 7:17:21 AM   
Rover


Posts: 2634
Joined: 6/28/2004
Status: offline
I say this in all seriousness... historical slavery and the treatment of wives has absolutely nothing, zero, nada, zilch to do with BDSM.  Nor is it some historical precursor to the development of BDSM.
 
Frankly, I'm shocked that this kind of misinformation exists in 2007.
 
John

_____________________________

"Man's mind stretched to a new idea never goes back to its original dimensions."

Sri da Avabhas

(in reply to Slavetrainer2007)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: how old? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.095