akbarbarian -> RE: Being loyal to your word (7/13/2007 6:15:10 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LaTigresse quote:
ORIGINAL: KnightofMists quote:
ORIGINAL: slaveofKaos No one on here is in our relationship and see's everything that goes on. Nope... they don't.... But, they don't have too.... I suggest people go read this book.. and they will appreciate even more why they don't have too.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blink_(book) It's a very interesting read.... of course this book will not help your relationship.. but it will help you to appreciate why people make the judgements they are of you and barbarian... without knowing you in detail. As I said... they don't have too.. and they can be extremely accurate in their judgement. There is one section of the book that talks about judging the success of relationships... it is very interesting and was an eye opener for me. I agree, that is an excellent book. Sounds like an interesting concept, but, more to understand the snap judgement people can make and stay with it despite evidence to the contrary? After the responses on the forum, my comment to Jodi is how much like cattle people can be once they start all moving in a given direction, but that's not exactly the same topic I suppose. I fully expect an attempt would have been made to Lynch me if the oppertunity has arisen. From MIB: A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it. Think: Why Crucial Decisions Can't Be Made in the Blink of an Eye is a book by editor and journalist Michael R. LeGault, released in January 2006. Think claims to refute Blink, the best-selling 2005 book by Malcolm Gladwell. It argues that America and the West are in decline because of an intellectual crisis. Think contends that blink-like snap judgments are the cause of major failures such as the Hurricane Katrina response. Michael LeGault maintains that relying on emotion and instinct instead of reason and facts is ultimately a threat to our freedom and way of life. [edit] Criticism Think has been criticized as a book that actually encourages the opposite of thinking and plays fast and loose with the facts. [1] "Since marketing a mud-wrestling match is an easy way to promote a book, and thus is probably the only true reason this book got written..." [edit] Praise "[LeGault's] analysis is frequently erudite, his sources and examples on point, and arguments logical, lucid and sometimes even funny." (Douglas Johnston, Winnipeg Free Press, Feb. 5, 2006) "Think! [has] emerged as a much more strategically important study than Blink...Think effectively dispels Gladwell's pop-art notion, but goes further to highlight the signs of decline in critical thinking in the United States and the Western World...the book is essential reading." (Greg Copley, editor-in-chief, Defense and Foreign Affairs Publishing Group, Jan., 2006)
|
|
|
|