CreativeDominant
Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: losttreasure I'm bored with all the "jessica" posts.  DarkDreams called this an interesting post and I agree, though there are parts of his answer I disagree with. quote:
If one partner, upon not getting their way, behaves in a manner specifically designed to make the other partner unhappy with the intent of eliciting cooperation... is that manipulation? Yes, it is manipulation. Depending on how it is used, and within the context of the situation, it is either good or bad manipulation. For example...dominant is displeased with submissive's behavior. He disciplines/punishes submissive for behavior. This makes the submissive unhappy but also...hopefully...forces her to rethink her actions/position and change her behavior to enhance the dynamic and please the dominant and "grow" her submission. Was the dominant's manipulation positive as in: "to control (others or oneself) or influence skillfully, usually to one's advantage"? or was it negative? I consider the above to be a positive example of manipulation. Now...the submissive does something to displease the dominant. Rather than speak to her about it, or punish/discipline her in a proper manner, he decides to pout in some manner...removing himself from her company, being truculent, whatever...in an attempt to make her change her behavior. Of course, since he has not been clear about what behavior she is supposed to change, then all she can do is scramble back over the last few minutes, hours, days to see if she can figure it out for herself and then try to "make up" for it. This is an example...in MOO...of negative manipulation. quote:
If the one partner is upfront by saying that if they do not get their way, they will purposely behave in a manner that makes the other partner unhappy... is that still manipulation? I see this as an overt threat...as to whether it is good or bad depends on the context. If a submissive has been fighting giving her submission suddenly and communication determines that "there is nothing wrong" yet it continues, the dominant may tell their submissive that if she chooses not to act submissive, then she will not be receiving any form of dominance, whether D/s related or BDSM related. I remember reading something along these lines in Devon and Miller's book...not the best way to handle things, in MOO, but in very limited situations I could see it being effective. Coming from the submissive, it could be seen as being a way of trying to "top" from the bottom.{/quote] quote:
If one partner tells the other partner that they are unhappy about not getting their way, is that manipulation? I see it as a direct expression of what they are truly feeling. It is depending on what happens after the expression of the statement as to whether or not it was manipulative in a good way or a bad way. quote:
Does gender or orientation (dominant or submissive) change things? I think orientation (either dominant or submissive) can change things...see examples given...but gender does not necessarily play a role. I do not see women as necessarily being more or less manipulative...either positively or negatively...than men. It depends on each individual.
< Message edited by CreativeDominant -- 7/11/2007 12:41:51 PM >
|