Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: A Hypocrite Exposed


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: A Hypocrite Exposed Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: A Hypocrite Exposed - 7/13/2007 10:02:00 AM   
Alumbrado


Posts: 5560
Status: offline
Consider the source... politicians, preachers, and infotainment media types are not delivering empirical evidence, they are dealing in persuasive hype.


(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: A Hypocrite Exposed - 7/13/2007 10:18:28 AM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
quote:

Mercnbeth is a republican(it okay,lol,it`s not illegal,yet) and probably votes that way.(btw,I would fight and die to defend his right to do that).I have voted republican ,when I supported Tom Kean.


Similar to most of your assumptions - Wrong! My political affiliation is the same as my religious affiliation - "Devout Pragmatist". But I did vote for President Bush both times; based upon the option presented. For the last 4 years - I've voted for and became a member of the "NO" party. Voting no, or against, any incumbent, including the CA 'Governator'.

It's never been raised but 1st term voted for President Clinton, second term against, because I didn't want to waste the next four years discussing BJ's instead of getting something done.

Here's a question for you Mr. Democrat. Who said; "We will pay any price to preserve liberty."?

Today - which party better represents the position associated with that quote? 

Since you don't like the word hypocrite, actually it may not apply in this case, how do you feel about refusing a direct answer to a simple question posed as probable consequence of the withdraw of troops from Iraq

Video Link: http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=3374379

Here's a Democratic leader, for you huh? Another great man who leads by not facing up to his positions. Not a hypocrite - perhaps just a coward to stand behind his words. 

Oh - and before you make another assumption - I think the US should leave today. My answer if I were confronted with the same question: "We've spilled enough blood for these people who either can't or won't address the problems they have within their country. When we leave, there will be more death, more murder, more torture; but its not our problem. We had some influence in the cause, but even with that consideration, we removed a man who was using a shredder to torture and maim. He's gone - perhaps the next despot dictator coming to power will be a bit less sadistic. In any respect, its not our country, its not our problem, with one caveat. We will protect our people and our borders. Any terrorist act determined to have been organized outside our borders under the protection of any other sovereignty will be responded to as if the sovereign country initiated itself. Whatever appropriate retaliation will take place swiftly and with prejudice."

On the subject of Iraq, isn't it a great thing that Ms. Pelosi may be running against Ms. Sheehan? Just by threatening her, Ms. Sheehan got Ms. Pelosi to pass another toothless resolution against the Iraq war. Think that would have happened without Ms. Sheehan's threat? WOW - I guess that will placate her constituents and they'll all go back tot he polls and return her to office as a result of her magnificent success.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: A Hypocrite Exposed - 7/13/2007 10:54:50 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

quote:

Mercnbeth is a republican(it okay,lol,it`s not illegal,yet) and probably votes that way.(btw,I would fight and die to defend his right to do that).I have voted republican ,when I supported Tom Kean.


Similar to most of your assumptions - Wrong! My political affiliation is the same as my religious affiliation - "Devout Pragmatist". But I did vote for President Bush both times; based upon the option presented. For the last 4 years - I've voted for and became a member of the "NO" party. Voting no, or against, any incumbent, including the CA 'Governator'.

It's never been raised but 1st term voted for President Clinton, second term against, because I didn't want to waste the next four years discussing BJ's instead of getting something done.

Here's a question for you Mr. Democrat. Who said; "We will pay any price to preserve liberty."?

Today - which party better represents the position associated with that quote? 

Since you don't like the word hypocrite, actually it may not apply in this case, how do you feel about refusing a direct answer to a simple question posed as probable consequence of the withdraw of troops from Iraq

Video Link: http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=3374379

Here's a Democratic leader, for you huh? Another great man who leads by not facing up to his positions. Not a hypocrite - perhaps just a coward to stand behind his words. 

Oh - and before you make another assumption - I think the US should leave today. My answer if I were confronted with the same question: "We've spilled enough blood for these people who either can't or won't address the problems they have within their country. When we leave, there will be more death, more murder, more torture; but its not our problem. We had some influence in the cause, but even with that consideration, we removed a man who was using a shredder to torture and maim. He's gone - perhaps the next despot dictator coming to power will be a bit less sadistic. In any respect, its not our country, its not our problem, with one caveat. We will protect our people and our borders. Any terrorist act determined to have been organized outside our borders under the protection of any other sovereignty will be responded to as if the sovereign country initiated itself. Whatever appropriate retaliation will take place swiftly and with prejudice."

On the subject of Iraq, isn't it a great thing that Ms. Pelosi may be running against Ms. Sheehan? Just by threatening her, Ms. Sheehan got Ms. Pelosi to pass another toothless resolution against the Iraq war. Think that would have happened without Ms. Sheehan's threat? WOW - I guess that will placate her constituents and they'll all go back tot he polls and return her to office as a result of her magnificent success.


You voted for bush???Twice???  Thanks for making my point for me.Your claim of non-affiliation is laughable and transparent.

A Cinton hater as well....lol,we know,it`s all his fault,yeah yeah.....Heard it all before.

And,not for nothing, it was you republicans, who distracted Clinton, and the US, and 60 FBI agents and investigators,etc etc.with the BJs and the WhiteWater farce and all that bullshit.Every paper Clinton touched,check he wrote or recieved,person he met was investigated for 6 funk`n years.And to complin about one blow job?Are you kidding?That was a distraction made by you and your ilk.When Clinton lied,no one died.How many men have died with bushes lies.

As for fighting for liberty....Have you seen the "presidential directive",where bush claims the power to take over all branches of government,if there is a "disaster",here or anywhere there`s US interests?Did you miss that one?Google it,...republican.Read that little ditty and tell me who`s fighty for liberty and the US constitution,and who`s fighting against it.

What would you do if your guy bush took over everything ,as put forth in that directive?Do you think he would hold elections or hold on to power,to "protect" us?

would you help him and trample the constitution ?For the record,I`m against this.



Mercnbeth:
"On the subject of Iraq, isn't it a great thing that Ms. Pelosi may be running against Ms. Sheehan? Just by threatening her, Ms. Sheehan got Ms. Pelosi to pass another toothless resolution against the Iraq war. Think that would have happened without Ms. Sheehan's threat?"

Yeah, I know democracy seems tough, pointless and confusing.Don`t fret though.bush will vito anything anyway,the pointess slaughter you voted for, will continue on.Misery acomplished.

Peace

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 7/13/2007 11:32:27 AM >

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: A Hypocrite Exposed - 7/13/2007 11:37:25 AM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
Owner -
I didn't realize you follow Mr. Moore and Senator Reid's tactics so closely or I never would have taken the time to respond as I did. Either that or your lack of  basic reading/comprehension skills prevented you from understanding and responding on point. However your rants are a fun read - thanks for the entertainment.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: A Hypocrite Exposed - 7/13/2007 11:43:22 AM   
bipolarber


Posts: 2792
Joined: 9/25/2004
Status: offline
Moore's tactic on CNN was simply taking a page out of the GOP's playbook: never answer a question, just go on the attack, and never let anyone get a word in edgewise. If called on any detail, immediately feign being offended and accuse the person asking the question of being either stupid, or seeking to to evil against God, country or his countrymen.

Doesn't really feel good, does it? Nor does it really contribute to the debate. Now you know what us lefties have been putting up with for the last 16 fucking years.

(in reply to Alumbrado)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: A Hypocrite Exposed - 7/13/2007 11:47:50 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bipolarber

Moore's tactic on CNN was simply taking a page out of the GOP's playbook: never answer a question, just go on the attack, and never let anyone get a word in edgewise. If called on any detail, immediately feign being offended and accuse the person asking the question of being either stupid, or seeking to to evil against God, country or his countrymen.

Doesn't really feel good, does it? Nor does it really contribute to the debate. Now you know what us lefties have been putting up with for the last 16 fucking years.


bipolarber:
This would seem to indicate that "lefties have rights too"
thompson

(in reply to bipolarber)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: A Hypocrite Exposed - 7/13/2007 11:51:09 AM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
quote:

Moore's tactic on CNN was simply taking a page out of the GOP's playbook: never answer a question, just go on the attack, and never let anyone get a word in edgewise. If called on any detail, immediately feign being offended and accuse the person asking the question of being either stupid, or seeking to to evil against God, country or his countrymen.
Careful, pipolarber, associating these things with Mr. Moore, the messiah of truth, can have some people calling you the "R" word!

(in reply to bipolarber)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: A Hypocrite Exposed - 7/13/2007 12:14:39 PM   
Estring


Posts: 3314
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bipolarber

Moore's tactic on CNN was simply taking a page out of the GOP's playbook: never answer a question, just go on the attack, and never let anyone get a word in edgewise. If called on any detail, immediately feign being offended and accuse the person asking the question of being either stupid, or seeking to to evil against God, country or his countrymen.

Doesn't really feel good, does it? Nor does it really contribute to the debate. Now you know what us lefties have been putting up with for the last 16 fucking years.


He also took owning stocks in Haliburton from the Republicans playbook evidently. The reason there are no hypocrites on The Left is you have no shame.

_____________________________

Boycott Whales!

(in reply to bipolarber)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: A Hypocrite Exposed - 7/13/2007 12:46:06 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Estring

quote:

ORIGINAL: bipolarber

Moore's tactic on CNN was simply taking a page out of the GOP's playbook: never answer a question, just go on the attack, and never let anyone get a word in edgewise. If called on any detail, immediately feign being offended and accuse the person asking the question of being either stupid, or seeking to to evil against God, country or his countrymen.

Doesn't really feel good, does it? Nor does it really contribute to the debate. Now you know what us lefties have been putting up with for the last 16 fucking years.


He also took owning stocks in Haliburton from the Republicans playbook evidently. The reason there are no hypocrites on The Left is you have no shame.


Estring:
How do we know that Mr. Moore owns stock in Haliburton?  I do not know that he does  but how would one find out this information unless Mr. Moore actually said he did?
thompson

(in reply to Estring)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: A Hypocrite Exposed - 7/13/2007 1:50:49 PM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
quote:

ORIGINAL: Estring
quote:

ORIGINAL: bipolarber
Moore's tactic on CNN was simply taking a page out of the GOP's playbook: never answer a question, just go on the attack, and never let anyone get a word in edgewise. If called on any detail, immediately feign being offended and accuse the person asking the question of being either stupid, or seeking to to evil against God, country or his countrymen.

Doesn't really feel good, does it? Nor does it really contribute to the debate. Now you know what us lefties have been putting up with for the last 16 fucking years.
He also took owning stocks in Haliburton from the Republicans playbook evidently. The reason there are no hypocrites on The Left is you have no shame.
Estring:
How do we know that Mr. Moore owns stock in Haliburton?  I do not know that he does  but how would one find out this information unless Mr. Moore actually said he did?thompson


thompson,
It is a very old story, disclosed in a book written by Perter Schweizer called "Do As I Say (Not As I Do). This article is also dated coming from 2005, but it is a reference I recalled making news a few years back that Estring may have in mind.
quote:

The year that Moore claimed in "Stupid White Men" that he didn't own any stock, he told the IRS that a foundation totally controlled by Moore and his wife had more than $280,000 in corporate stock and nearly $100,000 in corporate bonds. Over the past five years, Moore's holdings have "included such evil pharmaceutical and medical companies as Pfizer, Merck, Genzyme, Elan PLC, Eli Lilly, Becton Dickinson and Boston Scientific," writes Schweizer, whose earlier works include "The Bushes" and "Reagan's War." "Moore's supposedly nonexistent portfolio also includes big bad energy giants like Sunoco, Noble Energy, Schlumberger, Williams Companies, Transocean Sedco Forex and Anadarko, all firms that 'deplete irreplaceable fossil fuels in the name of profit' as he put it in ‘Dude, Where's My Country?' "And in perhaps the ultimate irony, he also has owned shares in Halliburton. According to IRS filings, Moore sold Halliburton for a 15 percent profit and bought shares in Noble, Ford, General Electric (another defense contractor), AOL Time Warner (evil corporate media) and McDonald's. 
"Also on Moore's investment menu: defense contractors Honeywell, Boeing and Loral."

Does Moore share the stock proceeds of his "foundation" with charitable causes, you might ask?

Schweizer found that "for a man who by 2002 had a net worth in eight figures, he gave away a modest $36,000 through the foundation, much of it to his friends in the film business or tony cultural organizations that later provided him with venues to promote his books and film."
Source: http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/11/3/150518.shtml 


In fact the article says Mr. Moore sold his Halliburton stock. Based upon the fact that Mr. Moore's first access to money derived from a law suit against his employer; the fact that he didn't sue the author of this book would be evidence of its accuracy.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: A Hypocrite Exposed - 7/13/2007 2:19:40 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
Mercnbeth:
As a cynic I always try to take a look at who the person is who is doing the reporting and try to keep that in mind while reading what they have to say for content.
The first thing that comes to mind is how did someone access IRS records?  I thought they were suppose to be confidential under most circumstances.  As I continued through the article I noticed that they mention that Mr. Moore flew to London on the Concord and stayed at the Ritz and rented a cheap room to hold his interviews in to maintain his image as a "man of the people"  If memory serves me didn't the concord crash in mid 2000.  The article points out that he hired mostly white men to the high spots in his film production staff the majority being producers....now correct me if I am wrong but aren't producers the money men and not hired staff?  This smacks of something less than fact just by a cursory reading.  Mind you I am not disputing anything that has been said but the cynic in me cries out for something a bit more substantial.  As for the foundation that he allegedly holds with his wife, the article does not go into detail as to its precise nature...but lets suppose that it holds mutual funds...as I am sure you are well aware one may not know from day to day what is contained in a mutual fund.  Before I would accept the article I would need a bit ...no make that a lot more in the way of substantiated fact.
I am not so much trying to make a case for Mr. Moore as I am making a case for fact to substantiate statements.  This article was woefully short of fact and long on statements.
thompson

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: A Hypocrite Exposed - 7/13/2007 2:31:12 PM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
quote:

I am not so much trying to make a case for Mr. Moore as I am making a case for fact to substantiate statements.  This article was woefully short of fact and long on statements.
thompson

thompson,
Similarly, I purposely didn't jump on the bandwagon representing this as "truth". I only remembered the book because is was given to me, (big surprise huh?) and I read it. I searched based upon the book name and the article came up. I suspect it is the source of Estring's statement.

I posted information pointed to responding to your question. No scientific validation intended or implied. I did do a Westlaw search concerning any litigation involving the author of the book and Mr. Moore that came up blank, but with the potential of so many a/k/a's and d/b/a's involved I don't think that provides any proof. The book obviously had an agenda.

There are public disclosures of stock purchases/sales, but I think the amounts represent a number below the disclosure requirement. I seem to remember this question was covered in the book, but don't remember the source attributed. If I can find it in the read books bin I'll let you know.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: A Hypocrite Exposed - 7/13/2007 3:05:27 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

Owner -
I didn't realize you follow Mr. Moore and Senator Reid's tactics so closely or I never would have taken the time to respond as I did. Either that or your lack of  basic reading/comprehension skills prevented you from understanding and responding on point. However your rants are a fun read - thanks for the entertainment.

"I didn't realize you follow Mr. Moore and Senator Reid's tactics so closely "

Not sure what you meant,but whatever...

"or I never would have taken the time to respond as I did.

lol,knock yourself out,lol......




Anyone defending bush and the bush crime family,after all that`s happened ,deserves everything they get.I have no qualms about fighting fire w/ fire,and taking on the ann colters,and swiftboaters,and carl roves,and bill oreillys of the world.They stoop so low ,they are subterranean.IMO When your foe comes out of the sewer,you gotta get into the gutter,just to face them.

This is not meant personally,but rather,in general.

One question,my  patriot friend and fellow American.....

How do you explain away Plamegate,and "scooter",and destroying the CIA assets like Brewster-Jennings? You know ,treason.
Can you square that so it makes sense?
My last point concerning the  "toothless" law that just passed.We`ll keep on, keep`n on, till we get out of your quagmire in Iraq.If it took a hundred "toothless" laws passed,it would be worth it.bush is keeping us there,just to save his political hide.Fuck that!!

Soon,very soon,you`ll see your conservative members of congress switch,and withdraw their support of bush.Soon.Then the laws will grow more and more teeth.Better watch out,we bite now.lol


Peace

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 7/13/2007 3:56:51 PM >

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: A Hypocrite Exposed - 7/13/2007 3:07:37 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

quote:

I am not so much trying to make a case for Mr. Moore as I am making a case for fact to substantiate statements.  This article was woefully short of fact and long on statements.
thompson

thompson,
Similarly, I purposely didn't jump on the bandwagon representing this as "truth". I only remembered the book because is was given to me, (big surprise huh?) and I read it. I searched based upon the book name and the article came up. I suspect it is the source of Estring's statement.

I posted information pointed to responding to your question. No scientific validation intended or implied. I did do a Westlaw search concerning any litigation involving the author of the book and Mr. Moore that came up blank, but with the potential of so many a/k/a's and d/b/a's involved I don't think that provides any proof. The book obviously had an agenda.

There are public disclosures of stock purchases/sales, but I think the amounts represent a number below the disclosure requirement. I seem to remember this question was covered in the book, but don't remember the source attributed. If I can find it in the read books bin I'll let you know.


Mercnbeth:
Dude: if your "read book bin" is anything like mine you are hip deep in stuff that is on the "A" list and up to your shoulders in the "B" list stuff.  On the up side it makes good insulation. Earlier this week I had three days of 125+ degree weather ...but with two feet of books on all sides keeping cool was not all that difficult.
thompson

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: A Hypocrite Exposed - 7/13/2007 3:55:12 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Mercnbeth:
As a cynic I always try to take a look at who the person is who is doing the reporting and try to keep that in mind while reading what they have to say for content.
The first thing that comes to mind is how did someone access IRS records?  I thought they were suppose to be confidential under most circumstances.  As I continued through the article I noticed that they mention that Mr. Moore flew to London on the Concord and stayed at the Ritz and rented a cheap room to hold his interviews in to maintain his image as a "man of the people"  If memory serves me didn't the concord crash in mid 2000.  The article points out that he hired mostly white men to the high spots in his film production staff the majority being producers....now correct me if I am wrong but aren't producers the money men and not hired staff?  This smacks of something less than fact just by a cursory reading.  Mind you I am not disputing anything that has been said but the cynic in me cries out for something a bit more substantial.  As for the foundation that he allegedly holds with his wife, the article does not go into detail as to its precise nature...but lets suppose that it holds mutual funds...as I am sure you are well aware one may not know from day to day what is contained in a mutual fund.  Before I would accept the article I would need a bit ...no make that a lot more in the way of substantiated fact.
I am not so much trying to make a case for Mr. Moore as I am making a case for fact to substantiate statements.  This article was woefully short of fact and long on statements.
thompson



thompson:

"As I continued through the article I noticed that they mention that Mr. Moore flew to London on the Concord and stayed at the Ritz and rented a cheap room to hold his interviews in to maintain his image as a "man of the people"  If memory serves me didn't the concord crash in mid 2000."



That`s what`s so easy about debunking the false charges and accusations that come from the right.They haven`t caught up to the fact that people can fact check shit,like when the concord last flew,and the date they claim Moore took a flight on it.What buffoons! Ever heard of google?Actually,the "folks",..... who produce this poop, know about google and  instant research.They`re just hoping you don`t,or won`t fact check.Good god.I also think they`re not up to speed,that these tactics don`t work as well as they used to,even ten years ago.The internet is the right wings biggest problem,because it has all but destroyed these BS tactics.They`re having issues catching up and doing their best to adapt,but can`t count on"swiftboating" and "willie horton"adds working and or bringing in more money then the Dems as much as they used too.

thompson:

"The article points out that he hired mostly white men to the high spots in his film production staff the majority being producers.".

The charge is specious,and is obviously an attempt to paint Moore in a bad light.The racial flavor of the charge is pure right-wing,and disgusting,but not at all surprising.

thompson:

...".now correct me if I am wrong but aren't producers the money men and not hired staff?"

Heyyyyyyyyyy, thompson,what`s wrong w/ you?<said in a kidding way>
Don`t let facts and common sense enter into this....the brainwashed need their fill of poop,and who are we to keep them from it.

You are correct about the producers,but Moore is still a racist ,b/c he didn`t find any black people with money to produce a film.LOL See?

These people have some nerve,no wonder Moore get`s pissed off.

Peace

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: A Hypocrite Exposed - 7/13/2007 4:11:45 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
Owner59:
Please do not misunderstand my position.  I am just as critical of the left wing hypocrites as I am of the right wing hypocrites.  Consider pelosi&co. vs bush&co...not a nickles worth of difference between them.  Pelosi and the democrats have the ability to shut the war in Iraq down by the simple expedient of closing the purse.  It is veto proof  and they have the votes.  What they do not have is the desire.  They are just as culpable as bush&co.  They just want to make political hay with some "feel good legislation" that they know there is not a chance in hell of becoming law.  If you read the text of the proposed law it says absolutely nothing....nothing changes.  The rich get richer the poor get pregnant....you know how you get pregnant ????by getting fucked.  No dinner,no movie,no lube,no goodnight kiss.
thompson

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: A Hypocrite Exposed - 7/13/2007 4:32:07 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
Mercnbeth, didn't you realize what was going to happen if you posted something like this ? By tomorrow there will probably be 20 pages. It took me awhile, but I am here now. I skimmed through, but I did not jump through. I am now prepared to render an opinion, although it is more on topic I think than that which has been posted lately.

Anyway, I make it a point to never find out what "left wing" and "right wing" means. I care no more about the democrats and republicans than I do about the whigs and the tories. It simply does not matter to me.

The same is not true of Moore. He has a strong democrat/liberal/whichever wing that is, bias. Part of his bias though is against the multinationals, the big corporations raping this country every day. That part of his bias I share. The rich are getting way too richer way too quicker. With our government it is as if open season has been declared on the American consumer.

Moore is right, actually dead on with some things in 911, a few other things, and though I haven't seen Sicko, I will. But I am here to say that I know he is biased. And politically, NOT the same way I am. I am not in a wing. I am not on the vessel when it comes to politics. I step back and I see things. Sometimes the bigger picture. There shouldn't be wings.

Moore is wrong. I would not trust any solution he would come up with. First of all the healthcare is really so crappy in some instances the bills they write should be disputable. And I really would rather opt out anyway, because I don't take from the government.

Now we have another fallacy, that people die simply because of lack of coverage. There are hospitals that recieved money for expansion or eminent domain advantages in exchange for providing low cost, or even no cost health coverage for the poor. I know a guy hasn't worked for almost a year, between some strife and some illness, they say that he is likely not to have to pay anything.

When my Dad was working everything was ala carte, full price, but on retirement now he gets his prescriptions for like $5 instead of $75. Procedures, operations all that, he pays a small percentage. That is because he goes to a publicly (partially) funded hospital. It's based on income, and he fixed it so he would have no house or car payments and can get by. He has enough to persue his hobbies and live pretty well. But he paid in all those years.

But that is not enough for some. When you look at a hospital bill what do you see ? Large numbers. Why ? Business is business. And that is precisely the problem, health care should have never become big business. Let me splain something about business.

You think the doctors and nurses get all that money ? Think again. There are layers and layers of skimmers, leaches, parasites on that gravy train. Layers of upper and middle management that make more than the ones who actually do the work. Stockholders, the legal staff. It is ridiculous. And when upper management fucks up, they get golden parachutes when they are fired. Where do you think this money comes from ?

The whole corporate structure is wrong, and that is why we are losing. Everything corporate is topheavy. And it might fall too, don't forget that.

And the greed is there. A few years ago the local public hospital tried to go private. To the gov's credit in this case they nixed it. They had given them enourmous help in expansion, damnear free will use of eminent domain, tax breaks out the ass. No fucking way should they be allowed to go private now. That would be a flagrant giveaway of our tax dollars, and even the controlled media might report it.

See that's how they think. the only thing they think abiout is getting there, staying there, and profiting on their position. People don't notice why. Moore can expose some of that but he stops short.

I fully believe that, in a newspaper newsroom, if a writer writes a story critical of a major advertiser, he will get called on the carpet. I could see it now "Boy, have a look at this" hands him a full page ad for a store, and says "you know how much we are getting for that ?". So if he tells him the truth, like in the Sunday paper, that a full page ad goes for like $115,000 the kid starts to understand.

He starts to understand the difference between principles and food. So it's either rewrite it, forget it and write about something else or we just drop it or bury it in the middle.

Another question, why do local utilities which have a monopoly run ads on TV. Those are being payed for with the money we paid them. They are wasting it. On it's face it seems foolish, very much so but over the years I have figured it out. They are buying control. They are buying control of the media that is now way beyond the commoner's reach.

So I presented my  opinion, and in MY opinion, my opinion was fair and balanced. If it is not in YOUR opinion, then I guess we disagree. I have no bone to pick with Moore, he presented it, and I think he called it how he saw it, I just don't agree with the way he saw it.

If you were he, and had found convincing evidence of a massive fraud, and found the normal media unwilling to make it public, and had alot of money what would you do ? I would study their way of manipulation and use the same tactics to some extent, or at least understand the tactics and how to defuse them.

Moore didn't do that. You can hear a desperation in his voice, he is not very strong in the mind. Even though the situation is desperate, that should not be communicated through vocal tones.

Moore never struck me as leader material, but I bet he wants the chance really badly. His perfomance on that interview was awful. He made a few points but he tangentalized right away, fuck that. If I were he I would up and say "OK, tell you what, a few figures might have been off, but what points exactly are at issue here, right now ?".

But then Moore is not quite right. Some of his responses were almost outbursts it seemed. Very counterproductive. The guy should've said "Hey, fuck you, we gave you airtime ". And he should've stayed on subject. Let his fans remember what happened three years ago and just file it. Moore made it almost antagonistic.

He fucked up. He is down a notch in my book. I like Alex Jones's style better anyway.

T

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: A Hypocrite Exposed - 7/13/2007 4:36:14 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Owner59:
Please do not misunderstand my position.  I am just as critical of the left wing hypocrites as I am of the right wing hypocrites.  Consider pelosi&co. vs bush&co...not a nickles worth of difference between them.  Pelosi and the democrats have the ability to shut the war in Iraq down by the simple expedient of closing the purse.  It is veto proof  and they have the votes.  What they do not have is the desire.  They are just as culpable as bush&co.  They just want to make political hay with some "feel good legislation" that they know there is not a chance in hell of becoming law.  If you read the text of the proposed law it says absolutely nothing....nothing changes.  The rich get richer the poor get pregnant....you know how you get pregnant ????by getting fucked.  No dinner,no movie,no lube,no goodnight kiss.
thompson



I`m just as critical of the Dems,when they go against my interests,and I wasn`t trying to mis-representing you as much as use you as a foil to rip on the tactics being used against Moore.

Imagine that you`re the target a  smear like that.That`s not the only article or comment made about him.The poop makers are well financed and well staffed,and with a target audience(Merc).Who amongst us could take that day after.Just look how Mercnbeth lost it.And he wants to critisize Moore?Ha!

Comparing bush to Pelosi,is like comparing a mad dog,to a pack of wild dingos.True,both are dogs, but the comparisons fade from there.

Has Pelosi outed a CIA agent and destroyed an overseas intelligence operation?Come on now.

My appologies to you.
Peace

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: A Hypocrite Exposed - 7/13/2007 4:48:53 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Owner59:
Please do not misunderstand my position.  I am just as critical of the left wing hypocrites as I am of the right wing hypocrites.  Consider pelosi&co. vs bush&co...not a nickles worth of difference between them.  Pelosi and the democrats have the ability to shut the war in Iraq down by the simple expedient of closing the purse.  It is veto proof  and they have the votes.  What they do not have is the desire.  They are just as culpable as bush&co.  They just want to make political hay with some "feel good legislation" that they know there is not a chance in hell of becoming law.  If you read the text of the proposed law it says absolutely nothing....nothing changes.  The rich get richer the poor get pregnant....you know how you get pregnant ????by getting fucked.  No dinner,no movie,no lube,no goodnight kiss.
thompson



I`m just as critical of the Dems,when they go against my interests,and I wasn`t trying to mis-representing you as much as use you as a foil to rip on the tactics being used against Moore.

Imagine that you`re the target a  smear like that.That`s not the only article or comment made about him.The poop makers are well financed and well staffed,and with a target audience(Merc).Who amongst us could take that day after.Just look how Mercnbeth lost it.And he wants to critisize Moore?Ha!

Comparing bush to Pelosi,is like comparing a mad dog,to a pack of wild dingos.True,both are dogs, but the comparisons fade from there.

Has Pelosi outed a CIA agent and destroyed an overseas intelligence operation?Come on now.

My appologies to you.
Peace


Owner59:
Apology accepted.
thompson

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: A Hypocrite Exposed - 7/13/2007 4:58:54 PM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
quote:

He fucked up. He is down a notch in my book.

Termyn8or,
Never expected Mr. Moore to generate this much feedback.

If you've taken the effort to go through this entire thread - my compliments and sympathy. I won't rehash, obviously you know it wasn't the message being criticized. Similar to President Clinton's 2nd term, my problem is in the wasted opportunity, while providing an unrelated distracting tangent. You just don't come off with integrity when you correctly challenge CNN and/or the news media in general for not asking tough questions, and then not answering them yourself. I though it was a simple observation that by now would be about 5 pages back in this thread section.

But oh well...

My parents contribute greatly to the $3000/car that US automakers have to pay to cover union negotiated insurance plans. The cost wasn't possible to project back in the '60s when it was won. Nobody responded to the question, but the reason why health care in the US became a private industry "benefit" in the first place was that during WWII when wages were frozen, it was a way for employers to attract more workers from the limited pool available. But back then Doctors were still making house calls for $2 and lawyers weren't waiting in the wings to sue if pulling a hang nail drew blood.

The system needs to be changed. Most industries, outside the AMA, ABA, and the drug companies are for some form of Government provided health care. The Canadians shouldn't be lobbying for it, because the high cost in the US contributes to the Canadian governments ability to control the cost of prescriptions. It an age of multi-national corporations and phantom income statements, its a complicated issue.

How can a person like me NOT appreciate Mr. Moore? I'm right at home with his sarcasm and baiting questions. Until I first learned of him, I thought those abilities were only found in NYC personalities.
quote:

Moore never struck me as leader material, but I bet he wants the chance really badly. His performance on that interview was awful. He made a few points but he tangentalized right away, fuck that. If I were he I would up and say "OK, tell you what, a few figures might have been off, but what points exactly are at issue here, right now ?".

But then Moore is not quite right. Some of his responses were almost outbursts it seemed. Very counterproductive. The guy should've said "Hey, fuck you, we gave you airtime ". And he should've stayed on subject. Let his fans remember what happened three years ago and just file it. Moore made it almost antagonistic.

We are not in disagreement.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: A Hypocrite Exposed Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109