BitaTruble -> Do SAT's measure intelligence or aptitude? (7/13/2007 9:18:53 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: akbarbarian But does this strike anyone else as a particularly bad combination when you look at both these reports? No. The two studies done don't relate to one another in any way. If you combine apples and oranges, you're not going to get a very good pumpkin pie. Know what I mean? The SAT's are a measure of scholastic aptitude and not cognitive ability and certainly not genetic cognitive ability. Basically, doing well on an SAT means that you're good at taking SAT's. The study encompassed 100K 17-18 year olds. (I can't help but think of those as 'kids' not men and women, but, you know, whatever.) The other study was conducted with 72 married Iowa couples, average age 33, average length of marriage, 7 years. I don't see any correlation at all between the two other than the fact they both involved men and women. Perhaps you can point out why you think they are relevant to one another? quote:
Women are 3.6-4 points lower on IQ scores, recent tests show brain size when adjusted for body weight is actually smaller not larger, and men tend to yield to their judgement. 4 points isn't a huge difference, but I wonder what the future will hold for our species just the same. We're actually using more of our potential and getting smarter as time goes by, not dumber. What, exactly, are you wondering about for the future of the species? That's a serious question by the way and I assume that you started the thread to generate dialogue, so, dude, let's talk. Celeste
|
|
|
|