Grlwithboy -> RE: Can you "learn" to be a Dom.... (7/14/2007 8:07:12 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MySweetSubmssive Hello .... I think you can learn to nurture and express your dominant (or submissive) side or learn techniques, but I don't think you can learn yourself into the role. From what you said your OP, it sounds like he is a wonderful service top (heh - some of my favorite people!). He knows what pushes your buttons (sensation play) and seems to be happy to do it. Something like power exchange seems trickier -- if he doesn't want that, I doubt it will work for either of you for him to go through the motions. You mentioned being worked over by the massage therapist's spouse. Would you and your husband be open to you being dominated outside your relationship? As to submissives helping dominants learn, I think that is entirely possible. In the first months that I was "coming out," I was adroitly assisted by a few submissive men who were able to answer questions, assauge my concerns and who were empathetic enough to know when to suggest things, give me feedback about the play, and to have a sense when I knew what I wanted for myself (and therefore to hush up). As to people who say that orientation is innate -- LA and Girlwithboy -- I believe you both have expressed switch tendancies. If orienatation is innate, what does this mean? Or is switchiness innate, too? I know this contradicts the first paragraph, but please humor me, I'm curious. MSS I'm not really a power swtich, so all I can figure out from it is that my brain chemistry releases endorphins when whacked. I'm kind of picky about who I share my endorphins with, but I don't really get mileage out of serving or pleasing other than pleasing myself. :) For the record, I think MOST human brains will release endorphins when you whack the ass - it's people's hang ups about this interesting bit of biology that are where it all gets really interesting. I think the vast majority of people are not Kinsey 0's and 6's and so it is with D/s. What you choose to do about that is anyone's guess. I personally don't feel the need to identify as "a switch" because there is no omnipresent submissive or even bottom drive - I like it like I like skiing - if I miss a season or seven entirely I'm OK with that, but I have skiied and loved it. As a Dominant and an owner, I'm pretty free form and yet intense when I mean it - which dovetails with everything else about my personality (I'm a creative, neither a follower nor a born leader type, very relaxed about most things but exceptionally passionate and particular about the things I make myself.) The more I've matured and the more I've explored, the more my play and my MO has aligned with these fundamental observations about myself - so normally while I ascribe a LOT of importance to nurture and development, I can't completely throw out any and all essentialism entirely. I think essentialism is often over-emphasized though. I totally agree with what you said in the first paragraph. And I also think that much more balanced switching is an innate orientation, as is the elusive Kinsey 3.
|
|
|
|