Focus50
Posts: 3962
Joined: 12/28/2004 From: Newcastle, Australia Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael Focus50, The most fucked up, abusive, and dysfunctional dominants I know are "older men" . The most screwed up BDSM group I know of is run by an older male dominant. The difference I see "on average" between older and younger dominants is younger ones tend to fuck up their partners, older ones seem to want to fuck up entire communities. quote:
You'd have no problems being bound and blindfolded etc and at the whim of a 20yo dom about to attempt his first experience with needle play or something? Even his 3rd attempt at it? You'd trust him not to panic and act responsibly if something went wrong? And would you not have more confidence if it were a 50yo dom with a 20yo sub newbie? Stupid example as a simple skill can be learned by anyone. Needle play isn't complicated, the army has 18 year old medics who do far more. It does carry higher risk but there is nothing intrinsic about a 50 year old handling a needle that makes is any less risky. In addition, the age thing is a red herring, if you asked her if she would want to be tied up by someone skinnier and shorter than here she would probably decline as well. Age, like size carries a PERCIEVED power but that is vastly different than the REAL power you are trying to state it does. quote:
Look, anyone can pull out specific examples to prove any point they like - death and taxes are still the only certainties in life. It probably won't be long before some whiz posts of an 18yo dom they know who is 99% trustworthy, competent and reliable etc while they equally know a 50yo dom who's a walking/talking blowhard felony at D/s - which will only prove one thing, "death and taxes"! And we see examples of the "50yo dom who's a walking/talking blowhard felony at D/s" every day here on collarme so again your case doesn't stand up. Looking at threads I don't think you could show anything other than 40 and 50 years cause the most problems. I think that says less about 40 and 50 year old dominants than it does about the self selected sample of who posts but there is no evidence that young = incompetent or that old = more skilled. quote:
But in a general sense where I don't know every single individual or dynamic out there, and neither does anyone else, I'd trust the average 50yo over a 20yo dom any day and I hold doms to a higher standard than subs because they're the ones tasked with being in charge, in control and the safety officer during a scene. To someone else, it may be just a "sack of 'taters" and I couldn't care less; their opinion isn't my opinion. Your profile states you aren't active in any organized BDSM scene and even if you were, it would pale next to my and others experience who post here. I live near SF and we have a bdsm event that draws over 10,000 people. I have owned public dungeons, run groups, attended events in multiple cities, I have been to het events, femme dom events, gay events, pan sexual events etc. I have seen a LOT of dominants of all ages. Age does NOT make or break someone as a dominant, skill and aptitude do and those traits are clearly not age specific. Well your obvious bias against anyone over 40 kinda puts all your reasoning in perspective here. No issues there. Just curious - you're getting younger and/or acquiring less as the years go by? But to review, it's all in the "dick measuring" or as you Americans might say, how far or high you can piss? I'm with ya now.... Focus.
|