|
SirKenin -> RE: Section 18 U.S.C. § 2257 (6/27/2005 3:12:44 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TormentiusYou say we've done nothing at all but piss the US off for 150 years with the exception of two incidents and then make a disparaging comment on a lack of historical knowledge. Our two countries have been allies and trade partners for most of that time, not enemies.
You have no bloody idea what is going on behind the scenes obviously. While W/we have been trade partners W/we have been teetering on the brink of relationship disaster. Read your newspaper and inform yourself. This has been going on for over a century. Where the hell have you been? Living in a cave?
quote:
Taken over Canadian commerce? Mark your words? Sounds like more delusions, not facts. And how is the fact the US gaining trade and natural resources from Canada even as we gain from their purchases and products an outright lie? Sure, both countries could sell their goods elsewhere but it wouldn't be near as convenient for either party.
Who owns Wal-mart? Who owns Home Depot? Who owns Starbucks? Who owns the greatest majority of the major chains out there now, slowly but surely putting Canadian business out of business? Why you are right. It is the United States Machine and it is coming for you.
quote:
You've been pointed at legitimate resources time and again throughout this thread and chosen to ignore them. Evidently my interpretation is agreed with by a major free speech organization who is challenging the law now among other organizations which are speaking out against this. You make the comment of people claiming the sky is falling yet assert just a couple posts ago how we should fear being taken over by our neighboring country just for disagreeing on policy. Do you even see the irony in that?
I have ignored nothing. your resources have been nothing but biased bullshit. I have just finished pointing out how in My last couple of posts. I am not ignoring the facts, you are and it is now becoming painfully obvious that you do not have a clue in the world what you are talking about. you are too busy relying on someone else to do your thinking for you.
quote:
You call me a puppet yet are blindly accepting a flawed law which is unable to be enforced outside US borders and does not address the real issues at hand. I'm all for child protection, but this isn't it. I note you didn't reply to my point on hiring more police to enforce the laws already in existence? Did you happen to miss that one in your rush to hammer out a reply?
This debate has gotten way off track and, frankly, I find your ignorance nauseating. My points have been made; I'm done with this.
The Law has merit. Period. It is not the be all and end all, but it is sound and until I am proven wrong in Court you can can it. Do not call Me ignorant when you have to feed off someone else's misinformation to make all your decisions for you and have not got a bloody clue in the world about the tensions between the US and Canada. your ignorance is so profound I would swear that you have been living in a cave for your entire life. Wake up and absorb the press. Think for YOURSELF for once.
As for police, that time will come soon enough. With the new Law in place they have something to enforce. Next will be a budget to enforce it. The hammer WILL fall, of this I am certain.
The only point that you have been made is that you are ignorant to the facts. If that is how you want to leave it, fine. I would not blame you. your position is indefensible.
|
|
|
|
