RE: CD'ers and submission (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


LightHeartedMaam -> RE: CD'ers and submission (8/9/2007 7:31:21 PM)

This managed to piss me off.  Paying HOMAGE to women?????  Care to esplain how this is honoring women here?  Why not tress up as Indians or in Blackface?

http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/ver/237/popup/index.php?cl=3608595




cloudboy -> RE: CD'ers and submission (8/9/2007 7:52:48 PM)


I don't really think women experience very much "gender restriction" or delineation when they dress. They can just put on what they want to. Their concern is mostly dressing for the occasion. So, to me women's fashion has incorporated "male fashion" into it. This was kind of your original point.

As for fashion, I think all the sexiness is in women's clothing ---- and I would agree that men's fashion is largely asexual. The one exception might be combat boots and military uniforms.

Your's and other's point, tho, that men need to get beyond themselves remains true. My point it that for CDs, this isn't the easiest thing to do. The reasons therefore are obvious.




thetammyjo -> RE: CD'ers and submission (8/9/2007 8:28:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SusanofO

I'll agree I wonder why there's no female equivalent to the male cross-dresser (that isn't say, a Lesbian Butch person anyway) - I do wonder. I know females can dress in masculine clothing and nobody bats an eye (and I do find that curious, in and of itself, I admit). But - I am talking about someone who looks like they take steroids, lifts heavy weights a lot, almost shaves their head their hair is so short, and chomps on a man's cigar a good part of the time, for instance. I don't see many of those women around (if any).

- Susan


There used to be this equivalent in the past. There used to be a big stink about women wearing pants -- my mother wasn't allowed to do that when she went to school.

Then two things happened I think. Note these are not my personal opinions or beliefs merely what I have seen studying gender in history particular modern American history. A warning: it will be rambling and it may well offend folks who want to believe we live in gender and sex equality.

First function. As women did more work outside the home it became necessary in some jobs to look more masculine or to wear clothing that didn't interfere as much.

Then it became trendy. A Freudian would say that this was an example of women trying to get a taste of male power but grabbing on to symbols of masculinity. Maybe it was and maybe it is. But over time even these "men's clothing" were changed so that there are women's pants and men's pants -- some of this may be a matter of general body shape and need but I think it has to do with making it acceptable for women to wear these clothing and still be "feminine."

The problem then is the reverse. Society views women still in an inferior position thus men wearing women's clothing are not doing anything that makes social sense -- who wants to be inferior? Don't we all want to be strong and independent especially if you have a penis? Whether or not we like it or want to believe it, we are all aware of this idea, it's part of the cultural consciousness just like most stereotypes are race, religion, sex, gender and economic status.

To address Cloudboy's and PrincessinLatex's exchange it is also about sex. Yes, men are seen as sexualizing women's clothing. Why wouldn't they? We are still in a society which maintain or at least is fully aware of the old idea that men want sex and women have sex -- sex is something men get from women in other words. Women are supposed to be sexy so that men will want them. By extension then women's clothing are viewed as more sexy and as a society we encourage that by making it more allowable for greater variety in fabrics, colors and styles in women's clothing.

Men's sexuality is something we are supposed to be afraid of thus warnings to daughters about boys and harsher ratings for movies with male nudity versus female nudity. Thus the idea that men rape and women are victims and the promotion of this idea in almost every aspect of our culture. Tom and Fox have both cried because they have seen women cross the street from them or change their body language simply because they are male and therefore scary (this is their impression but I have seen and heard these attitudes from women and men).

Because there is so much weight given to clothing and makeup and other differences that we create to differentiate between what we as a society see as only two sexes and genders, I think it makes sense that people will be offended when someone crosses that line. Doesn't it make it healthy to be offended? No but it is a fact that it happens.

(the below part is my personal response)

As I said in my earliest post on this topic, I'm not offended by the crossing dressing but I can get offended by the motivations and the attitudes someone types when they cross dress. I can understand why someone would feel more submissive and more sexy given what I know and can see in the mainstream culture. But I do not have to accept that those stereotypes about male and female (and ignoring anything that doesn't fit into that box) are healthy to promote.

When someone cross dresses as what they think is a woman and then they go out and are in the top or dominant role, I feel empowered myself -- had a partner who did this. When someone tells society "I don't care what you think" and dresses as he wants without changing how he lives or focusing on sex or fetish or drawing attention to how he's dressed, I feel empowered as a human being. But when someone plays up the stereotypes that place women in a position of inferiority, submission, or pure sexuality, yeah, it can hurt my feelings as a woman who tries not to promote such stereotypes.

My hope is that some day everyone can just dress and act as feeling naturally without it being a fetish or being the center of attention or taking drugs and getting surgery or living double lives or fearing rejection of family and friends employers.

I don't think as a society we are there yet. I honestly do not believe that promoting the stereotypes helps us get there either.




SusanofO -> RE: CD'ers and submission (8/9/2007 8:47:44 PM)

Tammyjo: I have to say I agree with your above post. As a small child, I remember that females did not wear pants (ever, really). If they did it was only inside the house. Gradually, that changed, though - especially as they entered the workforce in droves, and in many previously "male" professions (law, medicine, etc). I also personally remember the 1980's, when females wore "imitation man suits" (w/skirts) to work - complete with little bow ties, etc. (I had several of them. They were, looking back, a cross between "too cute" and horrid, IMO).

Heck - when my grandmother was a young woman, females had to quit their job when they got married - not just when they had kids. If  they didn't quit, then their bosses would fire them. This was legal, and socially accepted, at the time. Anywaaaay...

As for why some women cross the street when they see some men - I am sure I don't when I see all men, however - there are some men that are so very large and can look menacing - I'll admit I've crossed the street when I've seen them - if I am in a not so great neighborhood (or even if I am not).

Some (many) men are just plain bigger and stronger than the vast majority of women. I don't find the vast majority of men to be "scary". They could still probably beat me to a pulp if they wanted to do it, though (but not without my permission, he). But it's too bad that some men feel all women can think they are "scary" (I don't think all men are scary).

And I dunno why I am, rambling on about this...I agreed with what you said.

- Susan




thetammyjo -> RE: CD'ers and submission (8/9/2007 9:11:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SusanofO

Tammyjo: I have to say I agree with your above post.

As for why some women cross the street when they see some men - I am sure I don't when I see all men, however - there are some men that are so very large and can look menacing - I'll admit I've crossed the street when I've seen them - if I am in a not so great neighborhood (or even if I am not).

Some (many) men are just plain bigger and stronger than the vast majority of women. I don't find the vast majority of men to be "scary". They could still probably beat me to a pulp if they wanted to do it, though (but not without my permission, he). But it's too bad that some men feel all women can think they are "scary" (I don't think all men are scary).

And I dunno why I am, rambling on about this...I agreed with what you said.

- Susan



Thank you, Susan.

Tom brought this up the other night again and it hurts my heart when he and Fox tell me about these experiences.

We do things out of habit and without thinking a lot. I know that I do. I was sexually assaulted my sophomore year of college by a man who happened to be black. I found myself feeling more afraid around black men I knew and had known for a long time as well as strangers for months after that. I had to consciously do something about that and I hope I have.

Given other experiences in my life I probably do tread more cautiously around some men though I notice its more an age thing for me. I'm not proud I do it. I hope in future generations there won't be any reason to react this way for any one but the historian in me says that a bloody long way off if ever.

Sorry, I've taken us far off topic, folks.




SusanofO -> RE: CD'ers and submission (8/9/2007 9:14:38 PM)

Tammyjo: I agree. For me, too. Maybe some of it was conditioning from my mother. My father was not an "over-protective" type - my mother could be, though.

My dad wanted my sisters and I to try things like snow-skiing, and learning to fly an airplane, etc. My dad thought that over--protecting females might harm, their "sense of adventure", and that what some females were taught was socially acceptable for females was pure BS. But, my mother was more of a "traditionalist", I think. 
Anyway - I thought your post was right on. - Susan




MistressDolly -> RE: CD'ers and submission (8/9/2007 10:40:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PrincessinLatex

I'm not going to speak for all dominas but I don't think it is the cross dressing per se that bothers us. It is the fact that most that crossdress can't be honest enough with us OR themselves to actually call their crossdressing a fetish or a preexisting proclivity that they have. Instead, they choose to insult our intelligence by saying things like: "I will be your sissy maid slut and do whatever you want." or "I will dress up for you and your amusment." It is off putting for most people who identify as dominant for someone to TELL you just exactly how they will be serving you. . .as if I'm just here to sit down and be told how I'm going to be served and I'm gonna like it. C'mon, quit playing like I'm brand new. Wearing stockings, heels, and a mini skirt unsolicited has absolutely nothing to do with servitude. Don't piss on my leg and tell me it is raining.

snip:
If he has tried to pass it off as anything other than a fetish i.e. that he is doing it to make me happy, or he is doing it as some kind of service to me. . .I'd totally have reacted differently.



I agree wholeheartedly with you.  

I have no problem with men who like to crossdress; to each is own.   But, I do have a problem with some crossdressing men who front under the guise of "submissive" when they really are just dominant bottoms.  They have absolutely no desire to serve but they pretend to be a submissive so they can use you to top them in their fetish.  Obviously this does not hold true for all crossdressers.  I have had an experience in the past with a  crossdressing man whose motto was:  "Live to make you smile."  It turned out that life was short lived. 

I've also known some cd's who were upfront and honest about their crossdressing fetish and the fact they were not really submissive; they were a breath of fresh air amongst my fellow femdom girlfriends.  We enjoyed  and had fun indulging them in sissy play. 




LadyEllen -> RE: CD'ers and submission (8/10/2007 4:03:18 AM)

It seems to me that a major objection then, is that crossdressing is held to demean women (if done in a certain way)?

But is this the fault or error of the crossdresser? I think TammyJo's post above sheds light on this, in that to my reading at least, it indicates that this idea of women's attire denoting a lesser being (compared to men's attire indicating a greater), is something inherent in our culture. Thus the crossdresser is not actively demeaning women through his dressing, but expressing something in the only way the culture enables him to express it, in that he has no other "words" wherewith to say it? That women then interpret this in a different way is likely down to the very different subcultures that can exist between men and women.

E




rhythmboi -> RE: CD'ers and submission (8/10/2007 7:53:25 AM)

quote:

Thus the crossdresser is not actively demeaning women through his dressing, but expressing something in the only way the culture enables him to express it, in that he has no other "words" wherewith to say it?


But this is all tied up in a cycle of what influences what. If we didn't live in a society that distributed power inequitably between genders, would crossdressing even have any appeal in the first place?




Grlwithboy -> RE: CD'ers and submission (8/10/2007 7:55:26 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rhythmboi

quote:

Thus the crossdresser is not actively demeaning women through his dressing, but expressing something in the only way the culture enables him to express it, in that he has no other "words" wherewith to say it?


But this is all tied up in a cycle of what influences what. If we didn't live in a society that distributed power inequitably between genders, would crossdressing even have any appeal in the first place?


To me, you can drive yourself insane with this kind of reasoning. Would anyone do SM if we were peaceful and equitable?

I like working with what I've got, messed up as it may be. I don't feel essentially gendered enough myself to be insulted by caricatures of femininity, because femme feels like an act to me too, just an act I happen to like the best.





rhythmboi -> RE: CD'ers and submission (8/10/2007 7:56:39 AM)

quote:

I'll agree I wonder why there's no female equivalent to the male cross-dresser (that isn't say, a Lesbian Butch person anyway) - I do wonder.


why are you so quick to dismiss butches ( of the old school; pre-FTM revolution variety) as the corrolate to mtf crossdressers? in alot of ways i think they very much were the equivalent. there's a sense in which butch identity is more everyday and mundane and less sexualized or a fetish, but i still think it's the closest thing we've got.




rhythmboi -> RE: CD'ers and submission (8/10/2007 7:59:32 AM)

quote:

To me, you can drive yourself insane with this kind of reasoning. Would anyone do SM if we were peaceful and equitable? I like working with what I've got, messed up as it may be. I don't feel essentially gendered enough myself to be insulted by caricatures of femininity, because femme feels like an act to me too, just an act I happen to like the best.


and i do drive myself insane with this sort of thing on occasion. it's a personality flaw of mine...

i'm not trying to make a case for why there shouldn't be any more crossdressers or anything, but i think it's too easy (and maybe a little dishonest) to try and remove them or their desires from broader issues of social power. just as something to think about; since that seems to be what this thread has morphed into.




Grlwithboy -> RE: CD'ers and submission (8/10/2007 7:59:36 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rhythmboi

quote:

I'll agree I wonder why there's no female equivalent to the male cross-dresser (that isn't say, a Lesbian Butch person anyway) - I do wonder.


why are you so quick to dismiss butches ( of the old school; pre-FTM revolution variety) as the corrolate to mtf crossdressers? in alot of ways i think they very much were the equivalent. there's a sense in which butch identity is more everyday and mundane and less sexualized or a fetish, but i still think it's the closest thing we've got.


They were certainly just as outlaw. And butch women are certainly targets for societal outrage and derision still.





Grlwithboy -> RE: CD'ers and submission (8/10/2007 8:02:44 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rhythmboi

quote:

To me, you can drive yourself insane with this kind of reasoning. Would anyone do SM if we were peaceful and equitable? I like working with what I've got, messed up as it may be. I don't feel essentially gendered enough myself to be insulted by caricatures of femininity, because femme feels like an act to me too, just an act I happen to like the best.


and i do drive myself insane with this sort of thing on occasion. it's a personality flaw of mine...

i'm not trying to make a case for why there shouldn't be any more crossdressers or anything, but i think it's too easy (and maybe a little dishonest) to try and remove them or their desires from broader issues of social power. just as something to think about; since that seems to be what this thread has morphed into.


Heh, it's not a flaw. I like to see the question getting asked. I think the presence of third-gender transgender ritual crossdresser and other-gender-construct people in societies where the gender/power differentials also exist but are arranged differently argues for the idea that people will transgress gender/appearance norms for a host of reasons and in a host of ways.




rhythmboi -> RE: CD'ers and submission (8/10/2007 8:09:43 AM)

quote:

I don't really think women experience very much "gender restriction" or delineation when they dress. They can just put on what they want to. Their concern is mostly dressing for the occasion. So, to me women's fashion has incorporated "male fashion" into it. This was kind of your original point.


as a genderfucked female-assigned person, who vividly remembers having fights with my mom about what i could or couldn't wear on every holiday and formal-occasion of my childhood, i'll beg to differ. i was not going to synagogue in a suit and tie at age 12 no matter how much i yelled about it, and no matter how much i tried to reason about fairness and equality. and while i probably wouldn't be as much in danger wearing a 'men's' suit and tie out on the street now as you might be wearing a dress, i still won't get hired if i wear that to a job interview.




LadyEllen -> RE: CD'ers and submission (8/10/2007 8:10:05 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rhythmboi

quote:

Thus the crossdresser is not actively demeaning women through his dressing, but expressing something in the only way the culture enables him to express it, in that he has no other "words" wherewith to say it?


But this is all tied up in a cycle of what influences what. If we didn't live in a society that distributed power inequitably between genders, would crossdressing even have any appeal in the first place?


Thanks! You lead me to the question I was going to put in that earlier post, but didnt have time!

It comes from a psychometric test to identify various types of transgender behaviours, and its phrased something like -
"if tomorrow morning a law was decreed that everyone must wear the exact same clothes - blue boiler suit for instance), what would you think?"

The available answers were along the lines of
a) it would be OK, but boring
b) that would be great; dressing wouldnt be important any more
b) it would be horrible; I'd miss crossdressing

E




tobeshi -> RE: CD'ers and submission (8/10/2007 3:38:02 PM)

I do not believe that I used the word honor....is that your interpertation of the phrase that "imitation is the highest form of flattery"? Or do you beleve that is what is meant when I wrote that I wanted to be like my heroes/ heroines, those whom I respected and looked up too?
I fail to see the significance and revelence of equating crossdressing to race or ethnicity. Neither belong in this discussion.

Susanof O
I do not think your post would offend anyone. I sincerely hope that you get a chance to experience all that you want too and that it is with someone who will exceed your wildest/weirdest expectations. Thank-you for remaining open minded and not prejudging all of us.




SusanofO -> RE: CD'ers and submission (8/10/2007 5:56:09 PM)

tobeshi: You're welcome.

- Susan




LightHeartedMaam -> RE: CD'ers and submission (8/10/2007 7:16:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tobeshi

I do not believe that I used the word honor....is that your interpertation of the phrase that "imitation is the highest form of flattery"? Or do you beleve that is what is meant when I wrote that I wanted to be like my heroes/ heroines, those whom I respected and looked up too?
I fail to see the significance and revelence of equating crossdressing to race or ethnicity. Neither belong in this discussion.


Put yourself outside your box~  How would YOU feel if someone was saying they saw your picture and decided to emulate your appearance because they are into humiliation by becoming "you"?  Have you no comment on the video clip I posted?

You are 51~  isn't it about time you stopped using "hero/heroine worship" as an excuse to play dress-up?

My analogy using race and ethnicity is very accurate.  People do it all the time~  Whites trying to act black/Blacks trying to act white.

Ellen has my respect because she isn't a poser and walks her talk with no excuses.




iwearpanties -> RE: CD'ers and submission (8/11/2007 3:22:36 AM)

as along time submissvie male and crossdresser i hve never wanted too make an Mistress i served or subed too feel in any way shape or form that i was trying too be more girl then she  is .... i have alwasy offered my self as her whipping post and a sub too take her daily stress of life out oon me a submissve panty wearing male




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125