Owner59
Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006 From: Dirty Jersey Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: petslavennj I can't believe I am posting on this since most of what has been written is out of a passionate belief system that may or may not be based on an open minded reality. Placing blame on an inanimate object does not make sense to me. In the end, as with anything, it is not the gun that harms another, it is the person on the other end of it or the one who should have control of it. Banning guns does nothing to control the stupidity of those who misused the inanimate object to begin with. They will just find another source to use and those who blamed the inanimate object will then shift their concerns to the new object. I have owned guns since 1983. These were the ones purchased in my name. I have had small children in the house. I taught my daughter to shoot at a firing range at the age of 5. I have never had an incident. In the community where I lived for many years, high school boys went to school with guns in their trucks so they could hunt after school. There were never incidences of shootings in the school. If we need to ban guns to eliminate bad human behavior, do we then credit the inanimate object for the good behavior of these boys? With that mentality, we should then provide guns to more kids because of their good behavior and then this would encourage further good behavior. Growing up in an area that had territorial gangs, I saw many other objects used in a deadly way. Guns were not the object of choice at that time. A kid beat until the edge of death with a chain was just as gruesome, did just as much permanent damage, and was just as costly to the community. Why are we not on the bandwagon to outlaw chains in the open community? Common kitchen knives are used in many house break-ins, to perpetrate a rape on the street, and in many domestic incidences. They are readily available. Why are we not trying to outlaw common kitchen utensils (inanimate objects) to protect helpless men and women from humans who have problems? People who have psychotic problems will utilize any inanimate object that is available. If a gun is not available, it will be something else. Perhaps they will turn to making bombs as in the Oklahoma City incident. But rest assured, they will find something to suit their purposes. Taking one object away only leads them to look for something else. It certainly does not change the behavior. And, in the end, it is the psychotic behavior that is a danger to society. That said, parents who are not responsible with their guns, probably are not responsible in other areas of parenting as well. It is only a sign of bigger issues. The problems start at home. Perhaps we should look there. It is like blaming the candy in the store for a child shoplifting. Is it the candy, the child, the parent? The least likely perpetrator is the inanimate object. If we are going to expel energy in such a passionate way, then use it to do something that will make a difference. Be a Big Brother or Sister, volunteer to work with kids in the community, make a real difference. My best friend takes inner city junior high kids on a survival camping trip every year. She teaches them ways to depend on one another, she teaches them team efforts. They are not looking for guns to solve problems, they are looking to each other. I currently am working with high schoolers to help them explore career opportunities. I show them how they can succeed and I facilitate that process. They learn life skills they can use for the rest of their life. These type of efforts will help the issues we fear in society. Pet It`s not just as simple as saying guns are inanimate objects.That`s not the point. Guns are different from other inanimate objects. Compare a gun to a knife.Both are deadly,both are inanimate.One though,is a bit more deadly......quite a bit more. If I was confronted by a boy with a knife,I know I could take it and kick his ass.If I was confronted by a man w/ a knife,I`m pretty sure I could escape.At least I wouldn`t get shot in the back. If I was confronted by a boy with a gun,I`m not so sure I`d survive trying to take it.And I could be shot while retreating. There is a huge difference in the degree of lethality. A knife,even in a Navy Seal`s hands,is only so affective. A child w/ a gun,can kill even the most elite fighter. See the difference? True, the two are inanimate objects ,but the difference in their lethality,is both quantitative and qualitative. And there`s other down sides to owning deadly weapons.They can be stolen and used against LIOs and innocent folks.How would you feel,if you found out that a gun you owned,was used to hurt someone?As a gun owner,I fear that more then getting muged myself.But that`s me. Good to see you on the boards,pet.
< Message edited by Owner59 -- 8/11/2007 9:11:52 AM >
_____________________________
"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals" President Obama
|