EbonyFtshGoddess
Posts: 446
Joined: 1/1/2006 From: Hollywood Hills, CA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Politesub53 Take a look at how the EU has changed from being concerned with free trade, to now being concerned with just about everything. If there is any danger in this its to Canada and Mexico as America sure wont ever become the junior partner. My query would be how does this differ from Nafta, or is it just an incidious expansion of the same thing ? in a nutshell.. this partnership's goal is to unite Canada, the US, and Mexico in to a North American Bloc in an attempt to *compete* with the EU and the emerging Asian Bloc. i suppose on the surface it doesn't sound so bad if it wasn't based largely on privatization of many goods/services, corporate elistism and the elimination of sovereignty of all three nations involved. it also would make great changes by the merging of our currencies (pretty much killing the autonomy of each nation.) the currency for the NAU would be called the "amero." even the existence of the amero is highly contested, but it's something that has been well known and well speculated in financial circles for years. i dabble in foreign currency day trading (forex) and for years financial communities have been speculating as to its existence. i've heard that the amero has even already been coined, but that has been called a myth by official whitehouse FAQs. so i don't really know.. i just keep an open mind when it comes to things being contested or dispelled. the truth in the big picture always comes out and if americans knew that we'd be losing our dollar we'd flip a bitch. then again i'm sure europeans weren't too happy when the majority of them had to switch to the Euro so it's not a far fetched idea at ALL. the partnership was signed on 23 march 2005 in texas by the presidents of mexico and the u.s. and the prime minister of canada. and in fact the three leaders are supposed to meet again like 20-21 Aug of this year. even though this partnership is in direct opposition to pretty much every damn thing in the constitution, it is still truckin' on ahead without any congressional oversight or scrutiny. there is a republican representative in texas named Ron Paul and he seems to be the only voice in the US gov that's like... whoa whoa, you can't enter America in to a partnership like this without putting this before congress and the american people, yet it's still happening and is expected (or hoped) to be fully implemented and enacted by 2010, which i seriously doubt.. but ya never know, not unless another large 9/11 type event transpires and helps push it along a bit faster. i'm not quite sure under what authority bush is allowed to enter us into this trilateral partnership under such a shroud of secrecy. this partnership transcends *free trade* and is an attempt to not only pretty much open up the borders of all 3 nations, but it has energy, trade, customs standards, immigration, integration of our judicial systems, privatization, currency and civil liberty infringement implications. as with anything, there is a lot of speculation, conjecture, myth, truth, downright lies, and misunderstandings surrounding this partnership.. but it definitely strikes me as something that more people need to become aware about and question why it will have SUCH profound impact on all three nations, yet hardly anyone i know has even ever heard of it. a lot of the reading is rather dry, but the information is out there. for anyone to google it if they don't want to head in to a library. this video link is an hour long, but it's well worth the watch. connie fogal is the leader of a small political party in canada known as the Canadian Action Party.. she's rather eloquent- very well spoken. she explains in depth just what the ramifications of SPP are: http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-1355300745194023737 a little bit about the amero: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3jdQxDC7pA this link deals with primarily the immigration aspects of the SPP: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=194640 i have lots more but anyone can google the term and find the links themselves, or go to a legal library.
_____________________________
One Man's Phobia is Another Man's Fetish
|