OrionTheWolf
Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006 Status: offline
|
When I get a chance, I will read the actual briefs and judges opinion. I would like to see what the real issues were. Kind of like the McDonalds coffee case, if you heard it about it, it sounded ludicrous, but when you actually read everything, you saw that it was indeed merited. Orion quote:
ORIGINAL: Owner59 quote:
ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf Is it just me, or are people actually arguing about, which crooked person should be liked more? If the are in Washington, they are likely slime. If they call it news in the US, they are part of an entertainment company. Links provided as a source, are only valid if the sources of the source hold up. Good point, Orion. The real problem, is Fox`s claim that they can alter,fake,make up,or lie about the news,legally.They won a court decision ,that makes it legal to lie. This wasn`t an opinion or commentary.It was a news story about Monsanto and the use of BGH(bovine growth hormone).Fox wanted the two reporters to lie about he facts in the case.Pre-meditated,stone cold calculated lying. Fox, they report,you decide. Or in other words.Fox,they lie,you`re left to figure out what the fuck is the real story. One used to think that news people had integrity,that`s history.
_____________________________
When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."
|