|
Bobkgin -> RE: I'm getting too old for heartache (-.-) (8/20/2007 11:05:02 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Sinergy
quote:
ORIGINAL: LaTigresse
As for my personal relationship stuff, it stays OFF the boards. My life and I are not for public consumption. In addition, I refuse to whine about stuff I CAN CHANGE. The choices are mine and mine alone.
Well said, LaTigresse. I am also a private person who holds myself to high standards of keeping my drama out of
other people's lives. While I might mention something which is emotional for me, I do not look for somebody else to take care of my stuff.
I make general posts, but a quick way to anger me is to discuss my private life without my permission.
Sinergy
Ah, so we are switching from the "majority/mainstream -cannot- be wrong" paradim to the "privacy is paramount" paradigm.
Perhaps someone can point to the detail I've provided that helped them correctly identify the individual I was thinking of? (o.O)
But I doubt it.
The only ones who would know are the women who have done this to me, and what have I said to them other than how sad I am they didn't make it, how much I wanted to help?
I know, for the hard-hearts, that doesn't count for anything.
So tell me, o privacy advocate, what method would you employ to discuss a problem such that the individual involved cannot recognize him or herself, given the context you are discussing a problem?
Not discuss the problem at all?
Or just not in earshot of the individual in question?
What principle of privacy allows you to discuss someone else behind their back, but not to their face?
And if you cannot discuss it with anyone at all, how do you get help with a problem too big for you to solve alone?
As you can see, the "privacy is paramount" paradigm is a stack of cards. Doesn't take much to toss it down.
|
|
|
|
