ECF
Posts: 24
Joined: 6/24/2007 Status: offline
|
I think everyone values being needed and/or wanted. And that is sort of the basis for this, I believe. To turn to someone is your way of showing them they are wanted or needed or whatever you would like to refer to it as. I would like a better analogy, but without deeper thought into the matter, the best comparison I can draw is Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. First of all, you need to be able to turn to yourself. People close to you are often next. Then come friends, co-workers, all the way down to complete strangers. I would say that one needs to be able to turn to themselves in a time of need FIRST, before being able to turn to another person. That isn't to say that those who have said they turn to them are not able to do so (and therefore not able to turn to someone else). That would first and foremost be insulting, and secondly grossly inaccurate. Rather, I think that before you CAN turn to a partner, before you yourself consider you to be ABLE to even do so, you have to be able to turn to yourself. As you build trust in yourself as the primary source of reassurance and support in your life, you can then move on to having partners and close friends/family as your secondary. For some, from there, they'd have a third tier, and those tertiary people could just be friends, co-workers, and so forth as I said before. So to go all the way around the question, in order to come back to the question (forgive me on this one, I am a journalist with most of the fibers of my being, and I think it is just something that the entire profession has a nack for), I think everyones' first tier is themselves.
|