came4U
Posts: 3572
Joined: 1/23/2007
From: London, Ontario
Status: offline
|
quote:
To no one in particular
means to who/mever listens to you? , gives positive or one of whom you are 'able-ready to discuss/argue vs others YOU ignore?
quote:
From the "Section Guidelines - General BDSM Discussion":
Means um what??? simple words section, guidelines, general, bdsm, discussion.
quote:
"Criticism - Please keep criticism to a minimum. While disagreement is okay inflammatory comments aka flaming, humiliating and belittling other users is not acceptable."
Just because someone mentions your name as the OP does not mean a bad thing is occuring it is called as above ^^ = DISCUSSION. If you, personally feel flamed, humiliated or belittled it is perhaps because you start a topic yet cannot complete charge of such (topic).
quote:
Anyone know which dictionary the mods use when interpreting this clause?
Just curious.
Are you accusing mods of not 'saving' you from the very words you say you create and are becoming of you? Not much of a writer if you cannot distinguish purpose, thought and emotion into words without the audience giving shameful, bitter yet rightful criticizm for such prose. Write away, but be prepared to back up such statements of propriety to ALL the audience that returns time and energy into thoughtful response. Otherwise, go create a blog , a BOB-BLOG and give yourself some creative-leadership within the group that choose to follow your directorship in a conversation.
Calling mods? gimme a break, no one has directly flamed you. Old school? Anyone old school would direct you to the nearest submissive tea meeting for suggesting that ideal. Be a man and take all or several bantering thoughts or do not show up at all. Seems as thought you have a crush on Rover as one to give you the perfect outlet for what you wanted to say to begin with. How this conversation became what you thought it would be to how you LEAD it to be is obvious. That is why you ignore the others that see right through you.
Of course he doesn't see me, because I don't agree. sigh
Waste of air sometimes. It is no different that those that being a topic and 1. never return or 2. return to hear only the answers they want to. It only proves as many, many other threads, that your agenda wayyyyyyyyy out-weighs the response and again YOU only want to see yourself in print. (yes, and maybe some insecure submissive might see you are a God because you use big words and big paragraphs). lame, sad and lame.
oh man, now I just wrote a bazillion paragraphs explaining how someone else is a moronic attention-seeking manwhore. gulps. oh well, fuk ya! I don't claim I know it all, I am just stable enough to know I am not a BOB.
PS! an OFF-statement, but why do you not consider a submissive as competition? To me, you are more submissive, non-dominant. So who exactly is your competition? Who are you trying to impress with this banter with 'the so called limited few' that you do not have on block? To me, you have no status to compete with real men. Yanno, Real men who are not cowardice, mentally immature or under guise of an imaginary morality that is used with negative character charge. Men who post and not run, men who accept negative, positive, distant prospective thoughts without prejustice. I think I will block you. I am a submissive afterall, me weak, I can't handle you.
quote:
From the "Section Guidelines - General BDSM Discussion":
"Criticism - Please keep criticism to a minimum. While disagreement is okay inflammatory comments aka flaming, humiliating and belittling other users is not acceptable."
Anyone know which dictionary the mods use when interpreting this clause?
Just curious.
and WHOM are you 'NOT' refering to??? since you have most of us on block and cannot see any negative postings?
< Message edited by came4U -- 8/30/2007 4:04:37 PM >
|
RE: Competition in the 'community' - 
Profile
SOME-body is peeking again!!! 
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread