Stephann
Posts: 4214
Joined: 12/27/2006 From: Portland, OR Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: KnightofMists quote:
ORIGINAL: xoxi I agree with the person who said the best word would be 'inspire' rather than 'make'...it's something hard to explain, but I know that in my past relationships I didn't just wake up one day and say "I want to submit to someone, the first guy who comes along is going to get lucky," but rather it was something that was in me in its potential form, but it takes someone else bringing it out to actualize the potential. I agree... "Make" to me is a poor use of the word. Inspired is indeed a better word. In the end... I think healthy and successful relationhips are Recipocal.. and thus... both are inspired by the other. We bring out aspects of each other.. sort of like a chemical reactions.. we bring different things to the dynamic that positively reacte and create the relationship. If the aspects don't meld together.. well it just dies... or worse you have a Bomb in the making... some call it train wreck. I missed this thread originally it seems. I'll try to clarify, though others (LA, toservez, MadRabbit, et al) have done an excellent job already. I wasn't feeling particularly poetic when I wrote the original. Having said that, I also expected it to rub a number of people the wrong way. As I've pointed out in the past, being dominant is not the same as being a dominant. A dominant person naturally assumes positions of authority in social situations. A dominant, in the D/s context, prefers relationships where they are in positions of authority. One can prefer to be captain of a ship, without having a clue how to sail. A natural born sailor won't always be the captain. I don't like the word inspired. (Caveat: this is of course in my perspective.) I think it's an excellent way for the submissive to view someone she serves, certainly, but dominant individuals don't set out to say "Ok, how am I going to inspire this person to obey me." Rather, it simply happens. How it happens in any consensual setting is through a combination personal charisma, confidence, and knowledge (among others.) I don't think these things can be taught, though they can be learned through emulation. For those who were concerned though, I didn't use the word 'force' either. One doesn't force submission (in a consensual setting.) I would say that a dominant person draws submissive desires out. They are natural traits that naturally reinforce and encourage the other. The distinction I was trying to draw, originally, is well summed up by what Celeste had to say. There are many submissive who are submissive in a vacuum. Dominants who are not actually dominant people, require this type of submission. This isn't to say there are two 'types' of dominants and submissives; like sexuality, I'd consider it to be on a scale, but that's another issue. I hope this clarifies things. Stephan
_____________________________
Nosce Te Ipsum "The blade itself incites to violence" - Homer Men: Find a Woman here
|