SimplyMichael
Posts: 7229
Joined: 1/7/2007 Status: offline
|
Lucky, what you wrote made a lot of sense, assuming your grasp of history is shallow enough that you don't bother letting any facts get in the way. quote:
I didn't say they spent more money, I said they write the budgets, and they do. Look at Micheals chart, from 1931 - 1995 the democrats controlled the House 100% of the time, where all spending originates. And they controlled the Senate almost all of that time. And the debt went up in a nice generally even line, except for ww2 where it was higher as a % of GDP than now. Okay, now listen slowly. The chart doesn't display debt, it displays spending. So you can't understand the chart I am using but you are still a firm believer in "your" side. Not a chance they fooled you eh? Try reading this chart, THIS one covers debt, notice how are level of debt explodes as Raygun takes office? Aren't actual facts just inconvenient as all hell? http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/faq.html quote:
Not in the least because of the massive arms buildup that started after Khobar and the Cole, ie the begining of the "War on Terrorism", Clintons term for bombing Sudan, Afghanistan, and Iraq. It was the military built up under Clinton that Bush II is destroying. What I find so sad is that Republicans are still stupid enough to whine about Clinton bombing terrorists. Guys, you switched stories, now he DIDN'T do enough remember? Don't forget to keep your bullshit stories straight because it helps fool those who are even more stupid. quote:
Post 911 has been a huge increase on the debt, no doubt about it. and the Republicans have undeniably lost some of thier credentials of "fiscal restraint". Some? What the fuck would they have to lose a lot? I mean the congress voted for massive subsidies to big oil in the same periods they were reporting record profits! They were trying to build billion dollar bridges for 12 people in Alaska? Would they have had to wallpaper their yahts with $100 bills or would they only lose your respect if they burned them for fuel? quote:
Most Democratic candidates however are proposing to spend more, increasing it even more, so they still get the mantle. Republicans spent without paying, the definition of fiscal irresponsibility. Democrats are talking about repealing multi billion dollar giveaways to oil companies reporting record profits and repealing some of Bush's tax cuts to the rich. THAT is the exact definition of fiscal responsibility, pay for what you spend. You can argue you don't like HOW they are spending it but you sure as fuck can't whine it is irresponsible spending after the last eight years of Republicans spending like drunken sailors with a stolen credit card. Oh, and the KY twins. Flirting with each other is one thing, boasting to each other about each other is just gross.
|