DoomMaidens
Posts: 6
Joined: 6/12/2007 Status: offline
|
Oh, excellent, I love to cause trouble. Let me be the one to say, then, that if a Dom/me wanted to submit to me, I'd be much more interested in playing than if a "traditional" sub approached me. And now let me elaborate. I'm not interested, as the OP says, in "taking on subs." I don't have the shelf space for the books and knickknacks I own currently; I'm not about to start collecting anything else. But for occassional play...yes, much better in my mind if the person submitting is not someone who comes to it from a 100% pure and unconflicted inclination to do so. Myself, I like conflict, struggle, anarchy, chaos, inversions, strength, resistance...and a submissive I see as naturally or deliberately cringing, I could only dominate out of contempt, not pleasure. Disclaimer: Not saying that I've anything against submissives who don't switch, just that I prefer a confident, self-respecting attitude from subs. Perhaps, SensualGaGuy, you don't find it difficult to transition between Dom and sub modes in your play. Both more and less power to you in that case. But for me the idea that a Dom/me looking to sub would not be submissive "enough," would be a large part of the appeal. I'd enjoy playing off the other person's resistance, forcing dominance, reminding them that they wanted this. That, too, would be an interesting element of this scenario to me -- a Dom/me wanting to submit. I have a very fabulous, sexy, Dominant, and non-switchy girlfriend. Conflict and struggle we have in our play in abundance, and may I just say -- yay! But any submission from her is a favor rather than a desire and is not something I want to push. Pushing someone both willing and resistant certainly appeals... - Vetiver Lane Anarchist of the Doom Maidens
|