RE: Fred Thompson announces candidacy on Leno (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


caitlyn -> RE: Fred Thompson announces candidacy on Leno (9/6/2007 10:08:16 PM)

What are you worried about? Under the Edwards plan, Republicans will only be going to see Dr. Seuss.




cyberdude611 -> RE: Fred Thompson announces candidacy on Leno (9/6/2007 10:24:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SilverWulf

Take a look back at previous Presidential campaign seasons.  This year they all started several months earlier than before.  In the past, labor day weekend was when the campaigns started in earnest.  Thompson isn't late to the game, he just decided to start when it usually begins, not earlier like the others. 

IMO, this was a carefully calculated move.  People are already getting sick of the rhetoric and of hearing the same names over and over again for so many months.  By coming into the fray right now he will get a helluva boost just by being the new guy on the block, he will offer a bit of relief from the other candidates who already have high negatives just from starting the campaign season so early.

The last poll I saw had Thompson right up near the front of the pack, even before he announced officially.

If it were to come down to Thompson vs. Hillary, he would kick her ass in a national election simply because of her extremely high negatives.



Thompson looks more presidential as well. Believe it or not, that does matter a lot. That's simple psychology. People look at the president not just policy-wise but as the head of state. People tend to want someone who is strong and acts like a leader. Hillary is going to have a serious disadvantage in those presidential debates if Thompson is the nominee.

Thompson also doesnt come off with that elitist attitude that most politicians seem to have these days. And I seriously think that attidue is what is turning people off to politics. We need to get the corrupt elitists out of the government and start electing politicians that have some element of common sense. That's the problem with not only the White House but with Congress as well. No one has any common sense anymore.




TheHeretic -> RE: Fred Thompson announces candidacy on Leno (9/6/2007 10:46:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: cyberdude611


Thompson looks more presidential as well.




      Have you been standing too close to Fargle's machine that turns hemp into deisel fuel, Cyber???  He looks like his face is falling off.  I suspect his candidacy will be more like Wesley Clark or Howard Dean.  I doubt I'd vote for him, but I might have to risk popcorn-lung while watching the fun.




cyberdude611 -> RE: Fred Thompson announces candidacy on Leno (9/6/2007 11:04:26 PM)

Well then who is going to be the GOP nominee, Heretic? It has to be someone. Rudy is not going to make it. His performance in the debate was terrible and there is no way the moral values people will vote for him. He's out.
Republicans do not trust McCain...he's out.
Ron Paul is the one who reminds me of Howard Dean. He has a huge internet campaign and a bunch of people that call into Fox after every debate. But he has no ground campaign. He's won a few mionor straw polls but overall the GOP party does not agree with his isolationism and anti-military ideas. I mean when he's got far-left Democrats saying they like him, that signals a problem. He's out.

So who does that leave? Romney, Thompson, and maybe Huckabee. This seems to be who is truely emerging as the guys who will be there into Feb. Romney is leading in Iowa and New Hampshire. Thompson is near the top in South Carolina. And Rudy is putting all his chips into Florida.

Im not going to talk about the Dems right now because everyone and their uncle knows Hillary has the nomination all but locked up.




luckydog1 -> RE: Fred Thompson announces candidacy on Leno (9/6/2007 11:11:15 PM)

I am no fan of Hillary, but in the polls done over the past month, She will kick his ass by 15%.  In fact Hillary is(polls 2 weeks to 1 month old) set to beat everyone(Rudy, Thompson, Romney).  So is Barak




farglebargle -> RE: Fred Thompson announces candidacy on Leno (9/6/2007 11:18:15 PM)

Instead of restoring Honesty and Integrity to the White House, Bush has completely destroyed both the Conservative and Republican parties.

Well, Iraq, too. And the tens of thousands of wounded vets, and hundreds of thousands dead, but you know, that's not the current topic.

I saw someone mention Perot before. Turns out he was 100% right with the "Giant Sucking Sound"...





cyberdude611 -> RE: Fred Thompson announces candidacy on Leno (9/6/2007 11:31:45 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

I am no fan of Hillary, but in the polls done over the past month, She will kick his ass by 15%.  In fact Hillary is(polls 2 weeks to 1 month old) set to beat everyone(Rudy, Thompson, Romney).  So is Barak


It's way, way too early to be looking at those national opinion polls for the general election. The GOP vote is fragmented so much right now that it really isn't a very good statistical observation. They will get slightly more accurate in March. But remember back in 2000. Al Gore was 11 points ahead of Bush 60 days before the election. By election day, it evened up. A lot can happen. Trying to predict the general election this far out is like trying to predict the Super Bowl.




farglebargle -> RE: Fred Thompson announces candidacy on Leno (9/6/2007 11:39:15 PM)

POLLS???

Shit, even election results aren't honest! Who would think that a Poll was any more trustworthy.

The winner of the election will be....

WHOEVER THE $BIG_BOSSES DECIDE.

If they *DECIDE* the want the war to continue, they'll put in someone *Believable* who will do their bidding ( Hilary, I suppose... She's a Team Player.... )

But it's as fake as Pro Wrassling

Your Vote is just a part of the charade. The part that keeps you from having an armed revolution.

As long as people *believe*, they won't revolt.







cyberdude611 -> RE: Fred Thompson announces candidacy on Leno (9/6/2007 11:45:55 PM)

Im just saying that right now Hillary is ahead of the GOP candidates by 5 or 6 points. The general election is 14 months away. How the hell do you come to the conclusion that Hillary will win by 15 points? I just don't understand how luckydog comes to that conclusion...




Hottiegurl -> RE: Fred Thompson announces candidacy on Leno (9/6/2007 11:48:37 PM)

Excuse me for saying so but can't you argue politics without the name calling on each other.  Opinions are just that.  On either side of the lines.  I read this stuff and my stomach turns over.  I'd throw up on all of you. LOL.
 
Second, I watched and read some of the information on what is going on.  Everything is going so fast.  Kind of like Christmas starting August or September instead of Thanksgiving.  Everyone started early, getting a jump on it.  California changed its election date to get a jump on it.
 
Third, I don't see what is wrong with an Actor being in politics.  They seem to be there any way whether we want them or not.  Stating causes, working along side candiates, some have even killed a president.  History is full of strange bedfellows. 
 
I am a Republican by nature but I also vote for who I feel will do the better job.  I am not one to stay on total party lines and I use common sense more times then not to guide me.
 
I have yet to decide, but I like Fred Thompson.  I also like others on the tickets.




farglebargle -> RE: Fred Thompson announces candidacy on Leno (9/6/2007 11:56:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: cyberdude611

Im just saying that right now Hillary is ahead of the GOP candidates by 5 or 6 points. The general election is 14 months away. How the hell do you come to the conclusion that Hillary will win by 15 points? I just don't understand how luckydog comes to that conclusion...



Being *believable* by *enough* people, is the *only* thing that matters with Political Numbers.

Like Tinker Bell. If you clap loud enough, it'll be true.

Or like the 2000 Presidential Election... Or like Nixon's Re-election. It's nothing new.




TheHeretic -> RE: Fred Thompson announces candidacy on Leno (9/7/2007 8:21:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Or like the 2000 Presidential Election... Or like Nixon's Re-election. It's nothing new.



          (I'm going to regret asking, I just know it.....)


      Ok, Fargle.  What possible connection do you have between the '00 nail-biter and the blow-out of '72???




Sinergy -> RE: Fred Thompson announces candidacy on Leno (9/7/2007 10:54:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Or like the 2000 Presidential Election... Or like Nixon's Re-election. It's nothing new.



         (I'm going to regret asking, I just know it.....)


     Ok, Fargle.  What possible connection do you have between the '00 nail-biter and the blow-out of '72???


Illegal actions on the part of the Republican party?

Sinergy

p.s.  Just trying to be helpful.




TheHeretic -> RE: Fred Thompson announces candidacy on Leno (9/7/2007 11:41:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

What possible connection do you have between the '00 nail-biter and the blow-out of '72???


Illegal actions on the part of the Republican party?

Sinergy

p.s.  Just trying to be helpful.



       That's comparing schoolyard tag, to the NFL.  In '72, the man they called Tricky Dick had the full power of the office to play with.  In the race with Gore, Bush was only very well connected. 

       If we want a comparison to '00, then it's Nixon's loss to Kennedy in '60.  You've studied Nixon, Sinergy.  Couldn't he have pulled the same shit Gore did in Florida with the Illinois vote?

       That one landed us in a shitty war too.  (Hmmm  Did I already pack that tin-foil hat?)




farglebargle -> RE: Fred Thompson announces candidacy on Leno (9/8/2007 2:01:51 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Or like the 2000 Presidential Election... Or like Nixon's Re-election. It's nothing new.



(I'm going to regret asking, I just know it.....)


Ok, Fargle. What possible connection do you have between the '00 nail-biter and the blow-out of '72???


The results were both predetermined and fake?





luckydog1 -> RE: Fred Thompson announces candidacy on Leno (9/8/2007 10:41:07 AM)

Oops cyber you caught me.  The poll I looked at had Hillary beating Fred by 11% not 15%  my bad.  http://www.pollingreport.com/wh08gen.htm  Its on this page.  Yes it is very early, and these are not cast in stone.




luckydog1 -> RE: Fred Thompson announces candidacy on Leno (9/8/2007 10:42:15 AM)

So farg are you going to show us "any" sort of evidence for your allegation that elections are fake and predetermined?  You often demand stringent proof for things....so lets see it




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125