NorthernGent -> RE: Bin Laden urges Americans to convert to Islam (9/9/2007 5:45:55 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: maybemaybenot quote:
ORIGINAL: NorthernGent quote:
ORIGINAL: maybemaybenot The Prophet Mohammed before calling for jihad sent out an offer to the infidels to embrace Isalm. If they did not, jihad began. It is still part of the Islamic religion regarding jihad to invite to join them first, if not wage a holy war. The term Jihad has been corrupted; it actually means "strive", not "holy war". Holy war in no more a part of the Islamic religion, than it is the Christian religion . A gramatic error on my part and on the part of many a Mullah and Iman. But the meat and potatoes of my post is correct. My poor usuage of the term Holy War, does not negatte the historical facts. Once the offer to embrace Islam was declined, Mohammed unleashed war in the name of Allah. It is part of the Muslim doctrine. And jihad is indeed part of the Islamic religion and it entails violence/death against non believers of Islam and is sanctified by the prophet of Islam- Mohammed. Perhaps the absolute translation of the word jihad has been corrupted, but it's definition has not. Much the same as the word Islam is perported to mean peace in Arabic. It does not mean peace, it means submission. " Salaam" means peace in Arabic. mbmbn Based on historical evidence, "holy war" is no more a part of Islam, than it is Christianity. How many wars have been fought over the years in the name of Christian morals?; from what I can gather, some of you support the US government's intrusion into Iraq in order to preserve Christian morals and values: the perceived clash of civilisations etc. One unmistakable fact is this: the Christian governments of the West, supported by the wider population, have invaded Muslim countries for centuries. When was the last state/people sponsored Muslim invasion of the West? There is a complete imbalance here, and I can only guess at why Westerners turn a blind eye to the actions of their democratically elected governments, yet expect Muslims to take responsibility for the actions of a minority of terrorists. A person could pick at the bones of Western and Eastern cultures all day long, and take the good, the bad, or both as that person sees fit; however, when one culture is deemed to be inherently good, and the other inherently bad, then I'd suggest it's time for that person to reassess their personal ethics and morals.
|
|
|
|