ownedgirlie
Posts: 9184
Joined: 2/5/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: UR2Badored quote:
ORIGINAL: Bobkgin Thus the net result for the slave is that there are limits placed upon her. But she can claim honestly that she has no limits, thus leaving it to the master to define the limits for her. So she does not need limits as opposed to having no limits. That was my latest question..........does no longer having a need for "limits" or acquiring "limits" from the Dominants the same as having "no limits"? I saw you ask this before, too, and honestly don't know how to answer it any more simply than this - There are no barriers between me and my Master's access to me, be that access phyiscal, mental, emotional, or spiritual. While there may be limitations in my abilities to do XY or Z, I am a being, fully splayed open in all ways, for his taking. Whether or not he wishes to impose limits on himself is up to him. He might, and they might change later, but that is also his choice. Whatever the case, I remain as I am, completely available to him. There are things he might require of me that are virtually impossible for me to do. I will either learn them, or he will realize the impossibility - you know, like I can't hold my breath longer than a certain period of time before passing out, and I can't fly, etc...But I place no intentional barriers between us. And if he does something that I have a bad reaction to, either he chooses not to do it, or I learn to react better. I wouldn't say I've acquired his limits. That would mean taking his limits and calling them my own. That means if he changes his limits, I would have to relearn them and re-establish them for myself. It's easier for me to just go with the flow, and trust him explicitly as a human being, a man and my Master.
|