Pulpsmack -> RE: Is "hi" enough to respond to? (9/26/2007 5:18:57 PM)
|
I used to be VERY sympathetic to those who expressed annoyance with "form letters and one-liners" given the fools I hear all these lovely stories about. That sentiment almost went full-circle when I had spotted some particularly insightful or enjoyable profile, and I spent a good 15 min writing a unique and personal reaction to the profile, only to find it deleted unread or stagnating in a bulk box due to parameters that were NOT broadcasted on the profile (i.e. no out of towners, etc). There is nothing more irritating than reading some profile of a person who seems starved for some intelligent exchange given her warnings and entreaties, only to find the hypocrite "mindlessly" trashed an IM without consideration among the other 35 of the day. These are the jerks on the other side... those who give a valid reason for the form letter or one-liner. Today, I go by instinct. Sometimes I have a feeling that something substantial will be received and read, so I write that person the kind of message everybody wants to read. The others who seem proturbed by their inbox traffic send up the red flag, and I will write something short to see if the person is even paying attention and opening mail. If that is too short or insufficient for her arbitrary standard then it shows she is as mindless as those she criticizes (seeing how this very issue is addressed in my journal, and the explanation for my lack of a "Dickensesque" introduction is already in my profile.) Basically, your profile is your first impression. If "hello", or a simple line is all the person is willing to go on without considering what you have taken the time to lay out, then (s)he has not bothered to look at you in the first place and that dismissiveness is a great way to ferret out the incompatable and undeserving without wasting words. All it takes is a "hi" back to show you are receptive to some sort of conversation and THEN the expectation of intelligence, wit, and substance can kick in.
|
|
|
|