Bobkgin
Posts: 1335
Joined: 7/28/2007 From: Kawarthas, Ontario, Canada Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: UR2Badored quote:
ORIGINAL: BoiJen " Doormat is not an acurate description within this communicty. So if I were to bring a pot luck dessert to a BDSM function, am I not allowed to put vanilla extract (concentrated vanilla--oh dear) in it or just not tell anyone the recipe? That's cross-pollunating words (and contamination), and not an accurate use/description of a word within this community. If I subscribe to the above theory, can I no longer use the words top and bottom using the standard definition anymore? Certainly this must apply to all words in our vocabulary..........I am such a fake! Oh dear, where does "fake" fit in (BDSM or computer culture) I could only wannabe more clear. whoops! there I go. Assuming we should comply to the sensitivities of everyone with each kinky proclivity or every fetish, should we just eliminate the use nouns all together? quote:
ORIGINAL: amelliagrace quote:
ORIGINAL: camille65 This thread is so weird to me. True, but it also says rather interesting things about individuals who've posed to it. -grace This thread makes me so weird. lol There are a lot of words that could fit such a list. But "doormat" already has a meaning in the BDSM culture: the same one it has in the vanilla culture. We see it used here all the time. This is the first I've heard that tramplers want to reserve it for their exclusive use. BoiJen? None of this was 'un-obvious' when you started this thread. You seem intelligent and pragmatic enough to have realized this. So what was the purpose behind this thread?
_____________________________
When all is said and done, what will you regret? That you never really lived? Or there was so much living left to do? For those interested: pics and poetry have been added to my profile.
|