Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Femdoms can't find a decent male partner


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> RE: Femdoms can't find a decent male partner Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Femdoms can't find a decent male partner - 8/3/2005 7:22:40 PM   
TiNeedsHouseboy


Posts: 145
Joined: 4/24/2005
From: Big Apple blossom blown to The Windy City
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pollux
Well, how much time do you have? The thing is fraught with ethical problems.
It starts with issues relating to the sub's acceptance of his own kink.<snip>
Is he in a relationship currently? <snip>
If he's not in a relationship, is he prepared to have this experience part of his permanent romantic/sexual/intimate record? <snip>
If he decides to seek a relationship with a Dominant, who does he see? What desires/needs does he communicate? What's appealing to him? What are his limits? How does he provide for his own health & safety? What can he really offer a potential kinky partner? If he's got something to offer, how can he present himself so that he's viewed as an appealing partner? How & where does he carry out his search? What sort of support system is he going to need? Does he need to explore making some kinky friends he can turn to for advice & support, or are there some vanilla friends who can handle this? Is he prepared for the consequences that can result, either in terms of the potential health risks, or the risks to his relationships and his vanilla life? What precautions should he take and what safeguards does he need to put in place to protect those parts of his vanilla life that might be at risk?


Yikes! Keep it up and you'll put kink aware shrinks out of business!?!

I think the notion of a kink aware network of friends is critical. If anything's apparent, it's that people think they're walking around as "the only one" with a given desire, problem or feeling. Having a network one can use as a sounding board is always helpful in discovering he's not the only perv on the block, so to speak.

Just my opinion, but in trying to introduce a partner to one's pervy ways, I think it's easier to "corrupt" a vanilla male than a vanilla female. From what I've seen, vanilla females will often try it out to be accommodating, but then discover that BDSM isn't their cup of tea. I find myself facing endless discussions with married guys, trying to figure out why their wives won't dominate them and what to do about it. When they're too scared to even tell them that they want to be dominated, it's apparent that there's far more "impeding" their communication/trust issues than mere kinks.

BTW, for any guys reading this, who want to try to bring a girlfriend or wife over to the dark side, check out one of my favorite sites:


(in reply to pollux)
Profile   Post #: 201
RE: Femdoms can't find a decent male partner - 8/3/2005 7:51:02 PM   
AAkasha


Posts: 4429
Joined: 11/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pollux

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

I think the examples you give of submissive men that would not be wise to bring up their kinks to their loving, vanilla partners and have it work are men who are emotionally dysfunctional to begin with, and have issues far deeper than just their desire for kink. To say they should explore their dark, kinky fantasies with a pro perhaps, and have a normal relationship with a vanilla woman is not relevant, because they're probably not functional enough to have a relationship with a woman anyway.

The subs that are self aware, understand their kink, understand limits and have functional relationships are able to have loving relationship with the same woman they share their kink with, and are not better off seeking a pro on the side as your friend suggested.

Akasha


The problem with this view -- and it's fine as far as it goes -- is it divides the sub world into dysfunctional perverts and -- let's call 'em "mature", for lack of a better word -- submissive men. Maybe there's a better word. But they're subs operating at a pretty high level of emotional development and self actualization. What about all the guys in between those two extremes? Or guys who simply made a bad decision 20 years ago and are now living with the adult consequences?

There's a class of sub who's into stuff that most here seem to think crosses some kind of line. Not kink anymore, but symptomatic of some kind of pathology. I'm not sure how easy it is to define that line but it seems to be kind of an "I know it when I see it" kind of thing. You say, these guys can't maintain a relationship anyway, so the advice is N/A. I don't think MLV had that type of person in mind when she made her original reply, but ok, for the sake of argument, fine.

How about another class of sub that my friend might have had in mind? He's maybe not so self-aware, maybe doesn't understand his kink fully (who does, btw?)...but he *does* have a functional relationship. Maybe he's married, got a couple of kids, a mortgage, maybe achieved some success & status in his career and some standing in his community. Maybe he's married to a very nice vanilla lady. He also has an intense desire to experience __. Now, is __ kinky and dark? To the people here, maybe not so much. But to him it is, and to his wife it would be pretty black too. Now, maybe he's tried to introduce some femdom elements to the bedroom -- gently -- on a couple of occasions, but hasn't really gotten very far with that. Actually, he's gotten nowhere with it. Of course, he's attentive to her needs, and responsible, and faithful, and all of those things. He loves her. She loves him. They've created something together, and it's worth preserving. But just this *one* thing...nah, she's just not into that.

This guy's got a problem now, doesn't he?



Yes, but the "better" solution (or only solution) is certainly not what your friend recommended -- that is, to see a pro for his kinks and keep his happy vanilla life on the side. Not unless the vanilla wife knows and is very ok with it. All he is doing is compartmentalizing and cheating. Sure, he may get away with it -- he may get away with it for years. But what happens when she finds his kink drawer, or finds out he is seeing a pro? How does that make his life better?

If she is telling SINGLE men to consider dividing their life up like that I think she is doing them a disservice (we are talking about the functional man as you said, not the guy who is socially and emotionally damaged). They should be honest and up front with their female partners from the start. I don't condone hiding such a huge part of one's being -- their entire sexuality -- for the sake of having their cake and eating it too. It's not good for the sub because he's going to be living in the guilt, and it's not good for the relationship because it's based on a lie. How is it for the kids who are born into it? Not good either.


quote:


It's great that the ladies here are so gloriously kinky and self-aware and self-possessed and thank GOD for each and every one of you because you are a redeeming and healing force in the world. Really, I believe that. Believe it to my core. But I wonder what kind of parallel universe you are living in where lovers everywhere are as accepting of kink as you are? Or where everyone knows when they are young and foolish and get into their relationships that if their partner won't do __ then big problems are going to develop? Or where as young people they possessed the necessary self-awareness to say to themselves, "Clearly I'm a self-identified submissive man, and therefore I must seek out a self-identified dominant woman, and that if I fall in love with and marry a vanilla woman I will be miserable."

When I was younger I had this idealized view of love -- it was this magical state of unconditional acceptance, complete and total support, openness, honesty, fidelity, tolerance, patience, kindness, and, of course, pornographic sex. I think real love is a lot messier than that. Loving relationships only work if there's compromise. And, they aren't perfect. Lovers aren't always truthful and open with each other. Lovers keep secrets from each other. Lovers sometimes hide their true selves from each other. Lovers aren't always completely faithful. Lovers say "ewww" and "ick" and "hell no, I won't do that I don't care how much you want it, and can you please remember to pick up little Billy at 3?". The breakdown of any of those perfected qualities doesn't mean (IMO) that love isn't still present, or that a relationship where the two people haven't been completely honest, or they have some inhibition about sharing some secret side of themselves somehow means they aren't really in love, or aren't in a "functional relationship".

There's nothing perfected in the world, least of all love. It's all a big compromise. There's nothing even remotely ideal about it.


You don't have a shot to begin with if you are not at least honest with yourself and your possible lifemate from the start, at least with as much information you have to start with. Of course there are compromises in relationships. I don't agree with you that lovers need to hide their true selves with their partners, but perhaps I have an idealized view of love. The first step though is being comfortable enough with yourself before being comfortable with someone else, and many subs aren't even past the first step. They'd rather hide it.

You are getting off on a tangent now from the original point -- and that is whether or not a *femdom* is better off exploring her kinks with one partner and having a loving vanilla relationship with someone else. You've been finding here that most kinky women, at least here, have no problem being in a relationship with a man who fills both roles.

Akasha



_____________________________

Akasha's Web - All original Femdom content since 1995
Don't email me here, email me at [email protected]

(in reply to pollux)
Profile   Post #: 202
RE: Femdoms can't find a decent male partner - 8/3/2005 7:55:32 PM   
onceburned


Posts: 2117
Joined: 1/4/2005
From: Iowa
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pollux
What about all the guys in between those two extremes? Or guys who simply made a bad decision 20 years ago and are now living with the adult consequences?


Those guys 'in the middle' are probably in the majority.

quote:

But I wonder what kind of parallel universe you are living in where lovers everywhere are as accepting of kink as you are? Or where everyone knows when they are young and foolish and get into their relationships that if their partner won't do __ then big problems are going to develop? Or where as young people they possessed the necessary self-awareness to say to themselves, "Clearly I'm a self-identified submissive man, and therefore I must seek out a self-identified dominant woman, and that if I fall in love with and marry a vanilla woman I will be miserable."


I am not sure anyone is living in a parallel universe but I do think it is a good idea to lay out what works and what will not work. This way guys who have not made their choices can do so with a greater understanding of the consequences. The examples of how guys 'in the middle' make choices that they live to regret are problems which have been mentioned by many visitors in this forum.

quote:

Lovers sometimes hide their true selves from each other.


Yes, just as they often hide their true selves from themselves. Life involves compromise and love is never ideal. I wish that it were so. But the ideal can be approached and the ideal can be walked away from as well.

Communication is vital to any relationship, as is trust. Trust can be scary, and it can be painful. But it is the foundation upon which any relationship is built. And solidity of that trust is ensured by communication.

In my case, I married a vanilla woman thinking that I could ignore my attraction to BDSM. But it didn't happen. I married her for love (and to hell with kink). This was a compromise I was making with myself and ultimately it proved to be a bad one. I think I was 'in the middle', between the two extremes that you mentioned.

What to do about my increasing want/need/desire for kink is a problem that many guys 'in the middle' face. And I think we, in this forum, do an important thing when we stress communication and a willingness to take responsibility for consequences. But first we need to understand what we truly value and what are the priorities in our life.

Compromises will need to be made. Yes, it might involve painful choices. But its something that must be done - for the mental and moral well-being of the guy, and for the well-being of the relationship and also for the well-being of his partner(s) as well.

I think this is why many of us here come down hard on those to try to sneak around, rather than honestly confront the dilemma in their life.

BTW, you are a very articulate writer and a pleasure to read.

(in reply to pollux)
Profile   Post #: 203
RE: Femdoms can't find a decent male partner - 8/3/2005 8:12:24 PM   
SadisticPrincess


Posts: 87
Joined: 7/4/2005
Status: offline
Aakasha to the rescue again! I just deleted a seriously garbled and off tangent post.......

I have to admit that I am madly curious as to what kind of evil darkness the friend has in mind. Seriously.

When we mention these seriously dysfunctional men and dark desires, we are almost understating it. I have spoken to men who want to be castrated with those things you do bull castrations with; who want to be shit on and eat it and have NO concern for e coli infections; who want to be smothered to the point of coma; who want various mutilations/amputations; who want to relive/live child abuse experiences. The list goes on. I won't go into the various socially disturbing behaviors that they evidence.

Oh, and BTW, I do NOT see any of the aforementioned folks, personally or as clients. Thought I should add that, just in case!


_____________________________

Ms Francine
Headmistress, Michigan Club Fem

(in reply to AAkasha)
Profile   Post #: 204
RE: Femdoms can't find a decent male partner - 8/3/2005 8:52:51 PM   
TiNeedsHouseboy


Posts: 145
Joined: 4/24/2005
From: Big Apple blossom blown to The Windy City
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pollux
There's nothing perfected in the world, least of all love. It's all a big compromise. There's nothing even remotely ideal about it.

(p.s. Ti -- oops, I guess there *is* something in your post I disagree with ;)


Well, I never!! And they accuse women of being the ones who constantly change their minds!!!! <Hrumph!>

Hmmmm... Not sure what it is you're saying is a source of disagreement. Is it that you perceive my posts as meaning that love relationships = perfection? Yipes! Stripes! I never intended for that to be the interpretation. (Sorry that my fingers didn't have more time for details.) I had hoped that notion would be conveyed by my discussion about trying to accommodate a need without making myself go ewwww.

Nothing in life is perfect when it comes to interpersonal relationships. Evolution of needs and compromise between partners is essential over time because people are not static beings.

Within the confines of a D/s relationship, just as you need aftercare following a scene, you need ongoing weekly, preset discussion times. Some weeks, there won't be much to say. Other times, as problems arise, you'll need to think deep thoughts. If more vanilla couples had preset discussion arrangements, we might (this is speculation, but would be interesting to study) see a drop in the divorce rates.

The reason people are able to make relationships last -- despite lies, despite life's daily demands, despite changing needs over time -- is because of lots of hard work involving communication. I don't care how kinky or vanilla a rapport is. If you can't talk out your differences and figure out how to problem solve, your relationship is going to tank.

So, when those warts appear, you have to prepare for probable ongoing discussions until you figure out a way to deal with them. People who are not in love will not be motivated to invest that level of effort. It’s easier to just walk away.

My one qualification to the warts notion: If I discover that I'm stuck with a psychopath or sociopath, and it somehow eluded me that he's not fit to be walking free, I'll bail and run for my life! We'd have hit a hard, un-resolvable limit there!

Do we still disagree?

~ Ti ~


(in reply to AAkasha)
Profile   Post #: 205
RE: Femdoms can't find a decent male partner - 8/4/2005 2:06:55 AM   
GentleLady


Posts: 356
Joined: 2/1/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Or guys who simply made a bad decision 20 years ago and are now living with the adult consequences?

quote:

He's maybe not so self-aware, maybe doesn't understand his kink fully (who does, btw?)...but he *does* have a functional relationship. Maybe he's married, got a couple of kids, a mortgage, maybe achieved some success & status in his career and some standing in his community. Maybe he's married to a very nice vanilla lady. He also has an intense desire to experience __. Now, is __ kinky and dark? To the people here, maybe not so much. But to him it is, and to his wife it would be pretty black too. Now, maybe he's tried to introduce some femdom elements to the bedroom -- gently -- on a couple of occasions, but hasn't really gotten very far with that. Actually, he's gotten nowhere with it. Of course, he's attentive to her needs, and responsible, and faithful, and all of those things. He loves her. She loves him. They've created something together, and it's worth preserving. But just this *one* thing...nah, she's just not into that.

This guy's got a problem now, doesn't he?

Hello pollux

Are you asking: What does a male do who believes he is submissive but does not know how important a function that is in his life? Does he leave a long and good marriage to a woman he loves just to explore a kink need when he might find out that need is not important to him?

Everyone seems to be answering your questions with the assumption that the submissive male has explored the kink and already knows that it must be filled. What if he just admitted to himself (or discovered) this kink need? Should he explore it first with a Pro or lifestyle Dominant and find out how important it is to him? Maybe he will find out that the kink is one he can easily live without? How tragic if he had left the marriage and then discovered the kink was not really important. Has he ruined the marriage for nothing?

It is one thing to leave a vanilla marriage when you know the needs are important to you and must be met. It is something else to leave the marriage when you do not know.

Just a thought.
Gentle Lady



_____________________________

All things are possible to those who have patience, try, and are willing to learn.

(in reply to pollux)
Profile   Post #: 206
RE: Femdoms can't find a decent male partner - 8/4/2005 9:49:29 AM   
pollux


Posts: 657
Joined: 7/26/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

Yes, but the "better" solution (or only solution) is certainly not what your friend recommended -- that is, to see a pro for his kinks and keep his happy vanilla life on the side. Not unless the vanilla wife knows and is very ok with it. All he is doing is compartmentalizing and cheating. Sure, he may get away with it -- he may get away with it for years. But what happens when she finds his kink drawer, or finds out he is seeing a pro? How does that make his life better?


I certainly didn't say it was the only solution. It is A solution. One of many possible things to consider. And I never said it wasn't without risks. If it were me giving the advice, I'd tell him to consider a temporary strategy -- a therapeutic thing to explore with the objective of acquiring self-knowledge. If he goes thru with it and decides, you know this isn't really for me, if I want some excitement in my life maybe I should just fly airplanes, fine. But if instead he finds out that part of himself is being slowly killed off, and his kinky experience makes him feel alive and vibrant in a way he's never felt before, then well, he's really got some new data to work with, doesn't he?

quote:

If she is telling SINGLE men to consider dividing their life up like that I think she is doing them a disservice (we are talking about the functional man as you said, not the guy who is socially and emotionally damaged). They should be honest and up front with their female partners from the start. I don't condone hiding such a huge part of one's being -- their entire sexuality -- for the sake of having their cake and eating it too. It's not good for the sub because he's going to be living in the guilt, and it's not good for the relationship because it's based on a lie. How is it for the kids who are born into it? Not good either.

You don't have a shot to begin with if you are not at least honest with yourself and your possible lifemate from the start, at least with as much information you have to start with.


Sub men don't hide their submissive side because they want to have their cake & eat it too -- they hide it as a survival strategy. Unless he's one of the 0.1% of the elite sub men, or is so exceptionally desirable in some other vanilla respects (or he's going to confine his search only to the scene/munches, etc.), if he is "honest and upfront" with his female partner from the start, he is in for a very lonely life, and a truckload of heartbreak.

Do I think it's possible for a guy to introduce his vanilla partner to his kink and have it work? Of course. But it's not a foregone conclusion. Not by a long shot. And I think it's terrible advice to tell a man to share/communicate that aspect of his sexuality at the onset of a relationship. The relationship has to develop and ripen and there has to be a lot of trust and understanding before most men could even begin to feel safe doing that.

Keep something else in mind, too -- women work with relationships like kids work with Play-Dough. It comes easily and naturally to them. Men are built differently. Men are built to slay & conquer, not relate. Add issues of kink to that and it's like walking up to a preschooler struggling to put the blue circle in the blue hole and asking him to solve a series of partial differential equations.

quote:

I don't agree with you that lovers need to hide their true selves with their partners, but perhaps I have an idealized view of love. The first step though is being comfortable enough with yourself before being comfortable with someone else, and many subs aren't even past the first step. They'd rather hide it.


I didn't say lovers *need* to hide their true selves. I said they *do* (well, some of them do, sometimes). OTOH, I agree that self-acceptance is the first step. I'd go a step further and say, it has to be stronger than self-acceptance and being comfortable with oneself. You've got to really love that part of yourself. But still, you're right -- most men do hide it, although I'm pretty sure it's not that they'd rather hide it but more that they feel they have to.

quote:

You are getting off on a tangent now from the original point -- and that is whether or not a *femdom* is better off exploring her kinks with one partner and having a loving vanilla relationship with someone else. You've been finding here that most kinky women, at least here, have no problem being in a relationship with a man who fills both roles.


I've also been finding here people seeking triadic relationships, and quadratic relationships, and n-ratic relationships, and married Dominant couples seeking an entire stable of male and female slaves, and married people searching for cyber play partners, and every other possible variation. I don't know why it draws such criticism when someone suggests a male sub (esp. one with vanilla entanglements) might need to seek multiple partners, too. If some of these guys consider that, and it leads to greater collective self-awareness and enriches the pool of available subs, I'm not so sure it's tangential to the original discussion.

(in reply to AAkasha)
Profile   Post #: 207
RE: Femdoms can't find a decent male partner - 8/4/2005 9:53:10 AM   
TallDarkAndWitty


Posts: 1893
Joined: 6/12/2004
From: Rochester, NY
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

quote:

ORIGINAL: TallDarkAndWitty
That is, of course, why I can not dominate my romantic partner. It is a twist on the old Groucho Marx line, I would never belong to a club that would have me as a member. I can not reconcile the idea of my own domination as a positive force with the sterotype of abuse that it conjures up, so I have to sepatate the dom from the husband/boyfriend/lover.


He is either being sarcastic, or I feel extremely sorry for him. There must be a lot of self loathing that goes along with such an inability to be one's true self with the person they consider their soulmate and best friend. It's as if his 'icky side' must only be shared with women who, on an intimacy level, are 'less than'? Both women in his life are losing out.

Akasha



I am not being sarcastic at all, and please don't feel sorry for me, I live one of the most charmed lives of anyone I know.

While I think the word "appalled" might be too strong, a word for what I feel for my 'icky side', owning my wife/girlfriend certainly isn't something I feel belongs in a romantic relationship.

Elle and I have a partnership of equals. We both do things for the other and enjoy it when the other does things for us. However, we both also want to own slaves. We in no way want that slave to be our romantic partner and equal. Why? Because the things that would make them a slave would make them less desireable as partners.

There certainly isn't any self-loathing, though there were often feelings of guilt (or the closest I come to guilt) when I tried to dominate my romantic partner. It was not the right thing for me, and now that I have experienced the separation of my needs, I am fully satisfied...

Taggard

_____________________________

A most rewarding compliment is an insult from the ill-informed.


My slave: Kat (RainaVerene on the other side) and her website: RainaVerene.com

(in reply to AAkasha)
Profile   Post #: 208
RE: Femdoms can't find a decent male partner - 8/4/2005 9:53:59 AM   
pollux


Posts: 657
Joined: 7/26/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SadisticPrincess

....

I have to admit that I am madly curious as to what kind of evil darkness the friend has in mind. Seriously.



I honestly think she was referring to a subjective experience of "dark & evil" -- whatever it was that was "dark and evil" *to him* at that time. I know Akasha has a different view, which I respect, but I don't think she was talking about pathological clients. I think she was talking about clients who felt that their kink -- whatever it might be -- was "dark and evil".

(in reply to SadisticPrincess)
Profile   Post #: 209
RE: Femdoms can't find a decent male partner - 8/4/2005 9:57:16 AM   
pollux


Posts: 657
Joined: 7/26/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TiNeedsHouseboy

Do we still disagree?



I don't think so, not really. I was mainly being silly, but the part I was referring to was this:

quote:

To that end, if I can't share my deepest needs with my significant other, and if he can't feel the same way about me, then we clearly are not in love.


I guess I think that's the goal of love, or the idealized view of it. I don't think that necessarily has to be there at the start. I think there are plenty of people in relationships where real love is present but where each still has very deep unmet or unshared needs.

(in reply to TiNeedsHouseboy)
Profile   Post #: 210
RE: Femdoms can't find a decent male partner - 8/4/2005 9:59:37 AM   
pollux


Posts: 657
Joined: 7/26/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GentleLady

Are you asking: What does a male do who believes he is submissive but does not know how important a function that is in his life? Does he leave a long and good marriage to a woman he loves just to explore a kink need when he might find out that need is not important to him?



Yes, that's one of the situations I had in mind. Definitely.

(in reply to GentleLady)
Profile   Post #: 211
RE: Femdoms can't find a decent male partner - 8/4/2005 10:15:42 AM   
AAkasha


Posts: 4429
Joined: 11/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pollux

quote:

ORIGINAL: GentleLady

Are you asking: What does a male do who believes he is submissive but does not know how important a function that is in his life? Does he leave a long and good marriage to a woman he loves just to explore a kink need when he might find out that need is not important to him?



Yes, that's one of the situations I had in mind. Definitely.


Does a vanilla man in a happy marriage find his eye wandering after 15 or 20 years and decide it's better to "test the waters" by having just a "small fling" with another woman, to see how it makes him feel, before sitting down with his wife and talking about it?

Akasha

_____________________________

Akasha's Web - All original Femdom content since 1995
Don't email me here, email me at [email protected]

(in reply to pollux)
Profile   Post #: 212
RE: Femdoms can't find a decent male partner - 8/4/2005 10:21:05 AM   
AAkasha


Posts: 4429
Joined: 11/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TallDarkAndWitty

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

quote:

ORIGINAL: TallDarkAndWitty
That is, of course, why I can not dominate my romantic partner. It is a twist on the old Groucho Marx line, I would never belong to a club that would have me as a member. I can not reconcile the idea of my own domination as a positive force with the sterotype of abuse that it conjures up, so I have to sepatate the dom from the husband/boyfriend/lover.


He is either being sarcastic, or I feel extremely sorry for him. There must be a lot of self loathing that goes along with such an inability to be one's true self with the person they consider their soulmate and best friend. It's as if his 'icky side' must only be shared with women who, on an intimacy level, are 'less than'? Both women in his life are losing out.

Akasha



I am not being sarcastic at all, and please don't feel sorry for me, I live one of the most charmed lives of anyone I know.

While I think the word "appalled" might be too strong, a word for what I feel for my 'icky side', owning my wife/girlfriend certainly isn't something I feel belongs in a romantic relationship.

Elle and I have a partnership of equals. We both do things for the other and enjoy it when the other does things for us. However, we both also want to own slaves. We in no way want that slave to be our romantic partner and equal. Why? Because the things that would make them a slave would make them less desireable as partners.

There certainly isn't any self-loathing, though there were often feelings of guilt (or the closest I come to guilt) when I tried to dominate my romantic partner. It was not the right thing for me, and now that I have experienced the separation of my needs, I am fully satisfied...

Taggard



I guess I can't understand why someone would have a desire to make another person into something "less than" by having them endure acts -- so much so that they can't keep a primary relationship with that person. What does that say about the acts you are doing? Does it affect your feelings toward the person in such a negative way? Regardless of the acts themselves, how must the submissive feel knowing that in your eyes that person is put at a lesser status of some sort, or a lesser respect, because they endure it?

How does a submissive to you feel knowing that the nasty stuff you make them do makes you see them in a light -- a light that you'd never want to make your primary endure because it would ruin intimacy with you and her?

Not to trivialize it, but isn't that sort of like, "I can't treat my wife like complete shit and still respect her, I would feel guilty about that. But you, you don't mean as much to me, so yeah, I can treat you like shit and get off on it and it doesn't matter if I lose respect for you, because you're replaceable, and I wouldn't feel guilty about that at all"

Akasha

_____________________________

Akasha's Web - All original Femdom content since 1995
Don't email me here, email me at [email protected]

(in reply to TallDarkAndWitty)
Profile   Post #: 213
RE: Femdoms can't find a decent male partner - 8/4/2005 10:56:06 AM   
pollux


Posts: 657
Joined: 7/26/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

Does a vanilla man in a happy marriage find his eye wandering after 15 or 20 years and decide it's better to "test the waters" by having just a "small fling" with another woman, to see how it makes him feel, before sitting down with his wife and talking about it?

Akasha


I don't think that analogy holds up very well.

On top of that, I'm not an absolutist on the issue of affairs. Love is messy. People have affairs. Sometimes they're unnecessary and hurtful and stem from problems in the partner having the affair. But sometimes they're a legitimate response to one partner growing & changing at a different rate than the other.

I think when people are married they need to work very hard to sort out their issues within the context of their marriage, but sometimes that isn't possible.

(in reply to AAkasha)
Profile   Post #: 214
RE: Femdoms can't find a decent male partner - 8/4/2005 10:59:42 AM   
AAkasha


Posts: 4429
Joined: 11/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pollux

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

Does a vanilla man in a happy marriage find his eye wandering after 15 or 20 years and decide it's better to "test the waters" by having just a "small fling" with another woman, to see how it makes him feel, before sitting down with his wife and talking about it?

Akasha


I don't think that analogy holds up very well.

On top of that, I'm not an absolutist on the issue of affairs. Love is messy. People have affairs. Sometimes they're unnecessary and hurtful and stem from problems in the partner having the affair. But sometimes they're a legitimate response to one partner growing & changing at a different rate than the other.

I think when people are married they need to work very hard to sort out their issues within the context of their marriage, but sometimes that isn't possible.


Of course people grow apart and things change.

But deception as a way to resolve it, or an excuse, to me -- it's the bottom of the totem pole -- selfish, and cowardly.

Both for vanilla and kinky people. It call comes down to what kind of moral character you show when the chips are down. Do you cheat, and rationalize it, or cheat, and call it "testing the waters"? People will make their own choices. People will always look for an excuse to take the easy way out (cheat) vs. the painful way (honesty).

Akasha

_____________________________

Akasha's Web - All original Femdom content since 1995
Don't email me here, email me at [email protected]

(in reply to pollux)
Profile   Post #: 215
RE: Femdoms can't find a decent male partner - 8/4/2005 11:31:49 AM   
pollux


Posts: 657
Joined: 7/26/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

Of course people grow apart and things change.

But deception as a way to resolve it, or an excuse, to me -- it's the bottom of the totem pole -- selfish, and cowardly.

Both for vanilla and kinky people. It call comes down to what kind of moral character you show when the chips are down. Do you cheat, and rationalize it, or cheat, and call it "testing the waters"? People will make their own choices. People will always look for an excuse to take the easy way out (cheat) vs. the painful way (honesty).

Akasha


First of all, I'm not sure where you got the idea that it necessarily had to involve deception. And even if it did involve deception, as an advice-giver it's not something I'd be happy about, and it would absolutely be a last resort sort of thing (my presumption all along is that the guy tried to discuss this with his wife and got basically nowhere). Deception in this case is certainly a sin against the relationship, but is it worse than the sin of choking one's full potential and self-realization?

I understand where you're coming from, and I respect it because it's an admirable ethic, but I think that view is extremely rigid, and I'm surprised that someone as open-minded as you appear to be in so many other respects can't grant even the possiblity of this as an option for people in certain situations.

I wonder if in 10 years time your views on this will have softened any.

(in reply to AAkasha)
Profile   Post #: 216
RE: Femdoms can't find a decent male partner - 8/4/2005 11:48:06 AM   
SweetDommes


Posts: 3313
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pollux

First of all, I'm not sure where you got the idea that it necessarily had to involve deception. And even if it did involve deception, as an advice-giver it's not something I'd be happy about, and it would absolutely be a last resort sort of thing (my presumption all along is that the guy tried to discuss this with his wife and got basically nowhere). Deception in this case is certainly a sin against the relationship, but is it worse than the sin of choking one's full potential and self-realization?

I understand where you're coming from, and I respect it because it's an admirable ethic, but I think that view is extremely rigid, and I'm surprised that someone as open-minded as you appear to be in so many other respects can't grant even the possiblity of this as an option for people in certain situations.

I wonder if in 10 years time your views on this will have softened any.


in 10 years, I can see my viewpoint being the same as it is now - cheating is wrong, no matter what name you put on it.

If the person in question has spoken with their spouse about it, has told them that they need to at least try these things or they will be miserable and has the spouse's blessing to find someone to try it out with, that is one thing. But "trying to discuss this with [the spouse] and getting basically nowhere" does not mean that they have permission to go elsewhere for what they think they need. In that situation, should the person go elsewhere, it is cheating. That is when the person needs to step back, look at his/her life and make a decision: is it worth leaving their spouse to find out if the kink is all that they think it is, or should they keep trying to work things out with their spouse?

My thoughts on cheating come from how I view SSC - consensual involves everyone and if anyone doesn't know what is going on, then they cannot consent to it. By going out behind your (generic you here) spouse/SO's back, you are removing their possiblity for consent and that is wrong.

(in reply to pollux)
Profile   Post #: 217
RE: Femdoms can't find a decent male partner - 8/4/2005 1:32:39 PM   
TallDarkAndWitty


Posts: 1893
Joined: 6/12/2004
From: Rochester, NY
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha
I guess I can't understand why someone would have a desire to make another person into something "less than" by having them endure acts -- so much so that they can't keep a primary relationship with that person.


I don't consider being a slave as something that is "less than." Those who serve me are in no way less then those I love. What they are is different. The things that attract me to those that serve me are very very different then the things that attract me to those I love. When those I love do things that I expect from those that serve me, I get conflicted.


quote:


What does that say about the acts you are doing?


That they are the acts of a slave, and not of a romantic partner.

quote:


Does it affect your feelings toward the person in such a negative way?


There is nothing negative about being a slave. There is nothing shameful or "less than". However, I do not wish to have a romantic partnership with my slave, nor do I wish to have a Master/slave relationship with my partner. Both relationships are vital to my happiness, but neither is above the other.

quote:


Regardless of the acts themselves, how must the submissive feel knowing that in your eyes that person is put at a lesser status of some sort, or a lesser respect, because they endure it?


No slave of mine would ever feel that they were somehow less in my eyes because they served me. They would know going in that I did not seek romance, just service, but that our relationship would be very close, strong, and important to me, just as my romantic relationship is.

quote:


How does a submissive to you feel knowing that the nasty stuff you make them do makes you see them in a light -- a light that you'd never want to make your primary endure because it would ruin intimacy with you and her?


I hope it turns her on and lets her know the she has an irreplaceable spot in my heart. I hope it would let her realize that she would be to me something that my romantic partner can never be. I hope it would show her that she is fulfilling me in a way that no one else can...


quote:


Not to trivialize it, but isn't that sort of like, "I can't treat my wife like complete shit and still respect her, I would feel guilty about that. But you, you don't mean as much to me, so yeah, I can treat you like shit and get off on it and it doesn't matter if I lose respect for you, because you're replaceable, and I wouldn't feel guilty about that at all"


Not at all. It is more like I put gas in my car because it was made for gas; I put wood on the fireplace because it was made for wood. What works for one does not work for the other. Neither is better, they are just different. Used for different purposes and desires.

Taggard

_____________________________

A most rewarding compliment is an insult from the ill-informed.


My slave: Kat (RainaVerene on the other side) and her website: RainaVerene.com

(in reply to AAkasha)
Profile   Post #: 218
RE: Femdoms can't find a decent male partner - 8/4/2005 1:48:28 PM   
AAkasha


Posts: 4429
Joined: 11/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pollux

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

Of course people grow apart and things change.

But deception as a way to resolve it, or an excuse, to me -- it's the bottom of the totem pole -- selfish, and cowardly.

Both for vanilla and kinky people. It call comes down to what kind of moral character you show when the chips are down. Do you cheat, and rationalize it, or cheat, and call it "testing the waters"? People will make their own choices. People will always look for an excuse to take the easy way out (cheat) vs. the painful way (honesty).

Akasha


First of all, I'm not sure where you got the idea that it necessarily had to involve deception. And even if it did involve deception, as an advice-giver it's not something I'd be happy about, and it would absolutely be a last resort sort of thing (my presumption all along is that the guy tried to discuss this with his wife and got basically nowhere). Deception in this case is certainly a sin against the relationship, but is it worse than the sin of choking one's full potential and self-realization?

I understand where you're coming from, and I respect it because it's an admirable ethic, but I think that view is extremely rigid, and I'm surprised that someone as open-minded as you appear to be in so many other respects can't grant even the possiblity of this as an option for people in certain situations.

I wonder if in 10 years time your views on this will have softened any.


People used to tell me 10 years ago when I shared these views, "I wonder if you'll change your mind once you're married." Then after I got married people would tell me, "Let's see if you are saying the same things after the honeymoon period wears off." Now people say, "I wonder if you'll feel the same way in 10 more years." I still feel the same. I feel fine checking in ten years later on this, I don't think my view will change.

Rigid? Sure, but I don't think it's something to be rigid about. I hold myself and those closest to me at the highest standards of honesty. Am I unrealistic? In today's world, sure. But it's just something I personally consider important. I also was raised this way, with parents that stayed together 40+ years and all immediately family free of infidelity, and married into a family that has the same history of no infidelity.

I've held honesty and communication as two of the most important things in a relationship and never "settled." I've also avoided relationships where that kind of thing couldn't be two-way.

Regarding deception, I'm not talking about the relationships where it was determined by both people that outside relationships were ok. I am talking specifically about relationships where deception was the path chosen because communication or resolution were too difficult a path to take.

Akasha


_____________________________

Akasha's Web - All original Femdom content since 1995
Don't email me here, email me at [email protected]

(in reply to pollux)
Profile   Post #: 219
RE: Femdoms can't find a decent male partner - 8/4/2005 4:07:47 PM   
SadisticPrincess


Posts: 87
Joined: 7/4/2005
Status: offline
I absolutely think that cheating on a spouse is wrong. I think that those men who are looking for some kink on the side feel the same way agree, because when I tell them that I will only work with a married man with the wife's permission, somehow they evaporate......

It is more important to keep a VOW that you made to another person, or "find yourself" in a deceitful manner? Hmmmmm....... kind of a no brainer for me.

I am a polyamourous person, but poly relationships are hard to make work. Being poly does not mean that you are free to cheat, it means that there are MORE people to be responsible to/for. For multi-partner relationships to work, absolute openness is essential.


_____________________________

Ms Francine
Headmistress, Michigan Club Fem

(in reply to AAkasha)
Profile   Post #: 220
Page:   <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> RE: Femdoms can't find a decent male partner Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094